Market Cap: $3.2201T -1.760%
Volume(24h): $157.2287B -25.000%
  • Market Cap: $3.2201T -1.760%
  • Volume(24h): $157.2287B -25.000%
  • Fear & Greed Index:
  • Market Cap: $3.2201T -1.760%
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
Top News
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
bitcoin
bitcoin

$97547.497462 USD

-1.83%

ethereum
ethereum

$2738.851370 USD

0.16%

xrp
xrp

$2.497104 USD

-2.81%

tether
tether

$1.000278 USD

-0.03%

solana
solana

$204.709543 USD

-0.81%

bnb
bnb

$572.155036 USD

-1.67%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999985 USD

0.02%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.264189 USD

0.00%

cardano
cardano

$0.745883 USD

-0.73%

tron
tron

$0.224059 USD

1.20%

chainlink
chainlink

$19.509713 USD

-2.88%

sui
sui

$3.575762 USD

5.78%

avalanche
avalanche

$26.584614 USD

0.99%

stellar
stellar

$0.339104 USD

-2.13%

shiba-inu
shiba-inu

$0.000016 USD

5.06%

Cryptocurrency News Articles

XRP Ledger Briefly Unavailable Early Wednesday Due to Consensus Mechanism Design Issue

Feb 05, 2025 at 05:28 pm

The XRP Ledger (XRPL) was briefly unavailable early Wednesday as a consensus mechanism design led to a temporary halt in network operations.

XRP Ledger Briefly Unavailable Early Wednesday Due to Consensus Mechanism Design Issue

The XRP Ledger (XRPL) experienced a brief period of unavailability on Wednesday due to a consensus mechanism design that led to a temporary halt in network operations.

The incident began when the network's consensus process appeared to be functioning, but validations were not being published, causing the network's ledgers to “drift apart.” In the XRP Ledger, consensus among validators is crucial for updating the ledger with new transactions. If validators cannot agree on which transactions to include in the next ledger version, the network cannot move forward.

A “drift” in this context indicates that while the consensus protocol was technically running, validations (or confirmations of transaction sets) were not being published. At least one validator operator manually intervened to reset the network's consensus to a previously validated ledger state, although the network seemed to have rectified the problem independently, according to Ripple CTO David Schwarz in a X post following the incident.

“It's likely that servers refused to send validations precisely because they knew something was wrong,” Schwarz said, “and wanted to make sure no server accepted a ledger as fully validated when they couldn't be sure the network would retain and eventually agree on that ledger.

“One possible failure mode for XRPL is if all the validators think something's wrong with the network, all refuse to send any validations, and then there's no chatter to let the network reconverge. This is the 'silent network' failure,” Schwarz added.

No assets were at risk during the downtime, with XRP prices largely in line with broader bitcoin and altcoin movements.

Disclaimer:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

Other articles published on Feb 06, 2025