XRP與比特幣：供應辯論

當XRP支持者指出包括首席執行官布拉德·加林豪斯（Brad Garlinghouse）和CTO David Schwartz在內

People have been discussing whether Bitcoin’s limited supply gives it an advantage over XRP, sparking a broader conversation on the criteria used to evaluate cryptocurrencies.

人們一直在討論比特幣的有限供應是否比XRP具有優勢，從而激發了用於評估加密貨幣的標準的更廣泛的對話。

The conversation intensified when an XRP supporter pointed out that Ripple executives, including CEO Brad Garlinghouse and CTO David Schwartz, have never explicitly encouraged people to buy XRP—contrary to Bitcoin advocates like MicroStrategy’s Michael Saylor, who frequently promote Bitcoin as the superior store of value.

當XRP支持者指出包括首席執行官Brad Garlinghouse和CTO David Schwartz在內的Ripple高管從未明確鼓勵人們購買XRP（像Microstrategy的邁克爾·塞勒（Michael Saylor）這樣的比特幣倡導者），他們經常促進比特幣作為價值商店，當時的談話加劇了談話加劇。 。

A crypto analyst known as CryptoApostle highlighted Bitcoin’s capped supply of 21 million coins against XRP’s 100 billion tokens. He argued that this fundamental difference necessitates promoting Bitcoin, insinuating that XRP lacks such limitations. This perspective generally posits that Bitcoin’s finite supply upholds its status as “digital gold,” while XRP’s greater supply creates a perception of lower scarcity.

一位名為CryptoApostle的加密分析師強調了比特幣與XRP的1000億代幣相比，比特幣蓋了2100萬枚硬幣。他認為，這種基本差異需要促進比特幣，暗示XRP缺乏這種局限性。這種觀點通常認為比特幣的有限供應維持其“數字黃金”的地位，而XRP的供應量更大會引起人們對較低稀缺性的看法。

Schwartz refuted this rationale, asserting that evaluating cryptocurrencies based solely on supply or unit price is misguided. He illustrated that assessing assets by “full coins” without accounting for market capitalization, divisibility, or total utility distorts their true value.

施瓦茨駁斥了這一理由，斷言，僅根據供應或單位價格評估加密貨幣是誤導的。他說明，通過“完整硬幣”評估資產，而無需考慮市值，可劃分或總效用扭曲其真實價值。

“It’s inappropriate to compare prices per ‘one coin’ for the same reasons we shouldn’t compare supplies measured in ‘number of coins,’” Schwartz explained, likening such measures to comparing distances in inches versus miles. He highlighted that breaking XRP into smaller units—known as drops—provides comparable functionality to Bitcoin’s satoshis, rendering supply as a unit an ineffective benchmark for value.

Schwartz解釋說：“由於我們不應該比較用'硬幣數量'的供應的相同原因，比較每個'一枚硬幣'的價格是不合適的。”他強調說，將XRP分為較小的單元（稱為滴劑）提供了與比特幣的satoshis相當的功能，將其作為單位的供應供應是無效的價值基準。

CryptoApostle, however, contended that retail investors typically think in terms of whole coins rather than subunits like satoshis or drops. He also mentioned that although Ripple executives do not overtly advocate for XRP, the company’s collaborations with banks and financial institutions serve as an indirect promotional strategy.

然而，加密popopostle爭辯說，零售投資者通常會以整個硬幣而不是諸如satoshis或drops之類的亞基來思考。他還提到，儘管Ripple高管並未公開倡導XRP，但該公司與銀行和金融機構的合作是一種間接的促銷策略。

One major point Schwartz raised was the tendency for some investors to view XRP as a “better investment” merely because it is cheaper per unit than Bitcoin. He argued that such thinking overlooks the comprehensive economic factors that influence an asset's authentic value.

施瓦茨（Schwartz）提出的一個主要要點是，某些投資者將XRP視為“更好的投資”的趨勢僅僅是因為它比比特幣便宜。他認為，這種思想忽略了影響資產真實價值的全面經濟因素。

Market capitalization—the cumulative value of all coins in circulation—provides a more stable measure for assessing a cryptocurrency’s worth. However, many new investors focus solely on price per coin comparisons, neglecting total supply considerations. Schwartz has consistently warned against such superficial assessments, urging prospective buyers to consider deeper metrics.

市值（所有發行中所有硬幣的累積價值）為評估加密貨幣的價值提供了一種更穩定的措施。但是，許多新的投資者僅專注於每個硬幣比較的價格，忽略了總供應考慮。施瓦茨一直警告不要這樣的膚淺評估，敦促潛在的買家考慮更深入的指標。

The discourse surrounding XRP's valuation occurs amid significant developments. Ripple's ongoing legal challenges with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have injected regulatory ambiguity into XRP's future, impacting investor sentiment.

圍繞XRP估值的話語發生在重大發展的情況下。 Ripple在美國證券交易委員會（SEC）面臨的持續法律挑戰將監管歧義注入了XRP的未來，影響了投資者的情緒。

In addition, speculation regarding a possible XRP exchange-traded fund (ETF) has gained momentum, especially as the SEC reassesses its position on crypto-related financial products. An approved ETF for XRP could further solidify its status as a mainstream digital asset, potentially changing the narrative about its scarcity compared to Bitcoin.

此外，關於可能的XRP交易所交易基金（ETF）的猜測已經取得了動力，尤其是當SEC重新評估其在與加密相關的金融產品上的地位時。 XRP批准的ETF可以進一步鞏固其作為主流數字資產的地位，與比特幣相比，可能會改變有關其稀缺性的敘述。

At the time of writing, XRP traded around $2.55, reflecting a decline of 1.21% in the last 24 hours.

在撰寫本文時，XRP的交易約為2.55美元，反映了過去24小時內下降1.21％。

Simultaneously, XRP's price experienced fluctuations. Following a recent downturn, XRP rose above $2.50 but continues to face challenges amid broader market trends. Analysts believe its future performance heavily relies on regulatory clarity and forthcoming decisions from the SEC.

同時，XRP的價格發生了波動。在最近的經濟低迷之後，XRP上漲了2.50美元，但由於更廣泛的市場趨勢，仍面臨挑戰。分析師認為，其未來的表現在很大程度上依賴於SEC的監管清晰度和即將進行的決定。

Schwartz's recent comments underscore a crucial lesson for the cryptocurrency sphere: simplistic evaluations among digital assets can be deceptive. Investors assessing XRP, Bitcoin, or any other cryptocurrency should weigh market capitalization, divisibility, use cases, and network utility rather than solely focusing on supply figures or coin price.

Schwartz最近的評論強調了加密貨幣領域的關鍵課程：數字資產之間的簡單評估可能具有欺騙性。評估XRP，比特幣或任何其他加密貨幣的投資者應權衡市值，可劃分，用例和網絡公用事業，而不是僅僅專注於供應數字或硬幣價格。

As the cryptocurrency industry evolves, dialogues like these stress the significance of informed decision-making. While Bitcoin and Ripple's XRP fulfill different roles within the financial ecosystem, their intrinsic value should be gauged by real-world acceptance and market fundamentals rather than arbitrary comparisons based on units. For investors weighing their options, Bitcoin remains a more secure choice due to its established reputation as a store of value, enhanced by institutional adoption through multiple Bitcoin ETFs. Conversely, XRP may present more significant upside potential—especially if XRP spot ETFs gain approval or if legislative support enhances Ripple’s “made-in-America” standing. Savvy investors may consider holding both assets.

隨著加密貨幣行業的發展，像這樣的對話強調了明智的決策的重要性。儘管比特幣和Ripple的XRP在金融生態系統中扮演了不同的角色，但應通過現實世界接受和市場基礎來衡量其內在價值，而不是基於單位的任意比較。對於權衡選擇權的投資者來說，比特幣仍然是一個更安全的選擇，因為它已確定的價值存儲聲譽，通過多個比特幣ETF通過機構採用而增強了比特幣。相反，XRP可能會發揮更大的上升潛力，尤其是如果XRP現場ETF獲得批准，或者立法支持增強了Ripple的“美國製造”的地位。精明的投資者可能會考慮持有這兩個資產。

Watch – XRP Price Analysis Video

觀看 - XRP價格分析視頻