XRP與比特幣：有關直接促銷的辯論在加密社區中展開

最近在加密貨幣社區進行了關於XRP和比特幣如何促進的差異的辯論。 XRP支持者指出了漣漪

A recent discussion within the crypto community centered on the contrasting promotional strategies for XRP and Bitcoin.

加密社區中的最新討論集中在XRP和比特幣的對比促銷策略上。

An XRP supporter highlighted that Ripple executives, including CEO Brad Garlinghouse and CTO David Schwartz, have refrained from actively encouraging people to buy XRP.

XRP的支持者強調，包括首席執行官布拉德·加林豪斯（Brad Garlinghouse）和CTO David Schwartz在內的Ripple高管已經不積極鼓勵人們購買XRP。

This approach was juxtaposed with MicroStrategy’s Michael Saylor, who frequently advocates for Bitcoin. The supporter suggested that assets requiring direct promotion may indicate underlying weaknesses, sparking responses from the community.

這種方法與Microstrategy的Michael Saylor並列，後者經常倡導比特幣。支持者建議，需要直接促進的資產可能表明潛在的弱點，並引發社區的反應。

Crypto commentator CryptoApostle highlighted the disparity in supply between Bitcoin’s 21 million coins and XRP’s 100 billion. He proposed that Bitcoin’s scarcity necessitates "pointing people in the right direction," implying that XRP does not face the same limitations.

加密評論員CryptoApostle強調了比特幣2100萬枚硬幣和XRP 1000億的供應差異。他提出，比特幣的稀缺性需要“將人們指向正確的方向”，這意味著XRP並不面臨相同的局限性。

However, Ripple's David Schwartz contested this perspective, arguing that supply comparisons between XRP and Bitcoin are often misleading.

但是，Ripple的David Schwartz對這一觀點進行了質疑，認為XRP和Bitcoin之間的供應比較常常具有誤導性。

Related: Ripple CTO Challenges Bitcoin Supply Scarcity Claims in Heated Debate

相關：Ripple CTO挑戰比特幣供應稀缺性索賠

Ripple CTO Refutes “Full Coin” Comparisons

Ripple CTO反駁“全硬幣”比較

Schwartz emphasized that measuring crypto assets in "full coins" without considering market cap or divisibility leads to misinformation. He compared it to measuring distances in inches versus miles, stating that such comparisons distort the true value and utility of each asset.

Schwartz強調，在“完整硬幣”中測量加密資產而不考慮市值或劃分性會導致錯誤信息。他將其與以英寸與英里相比的測量距離進行了比較，表明這種比較扭曲了每個資產的真實價值和效用。

CryptoApostle maintained that people naturally compare whole coins rather than smaller units like satoshis or drops. He also pointed out that Ripple’s partnerships with banks indirectly market XRP, even if executives do not explicitly promote buying it.

加密帕特爾（Cryptoapostle）堅持認為，人們自然會比較整個硬幣，而不是較小的單位，例如satoshis或drops。他還指出，即使高管們沒有明確促進購買它，Ripple與銀行與銀行的合作夥伴關係也間接地銷售XRP。

Related: Ripple CTO Makes The Case For XRP Inclusion in Crypto Stockpile

相關：Ripple CTO為XRP包含在加密儲備中的案例

Meanwhile, Schwartz asserted that supply and price-per-coin are frequently misused in investment decisions. He noted that some investors believe XRP is a better buy simply because it appears cheaper per unit compared to Bitcoin—a narrative he finds concerning.

同時，施瓦茨（Schwartz）斷言，供應和每幣價格經常在投資決策中被濫用。他指出，一些投資者認為XRP是一種更好的買入，僅僅是因為與比特幣相比，每單位看起來更便宜，這是他發現的敘述。

"You can't compare the prices for ‘one coin’ for precisely the same reason you can't compare the supplies measured in ‘number of coins,'" Schwartz stated, reinforcing the importance of accurate comparisons.

Schwartz說，“您無法與無法比較用'硬幣數量'的耗材進行比較的原因相同的原因來比較'一枚硬幣'的價格。”

Ultimately, the discussion highlights the issue of evaluating crypto assets based on supply or unit price rather than fundamental value. It stresses that market participants must look beyond surface-level comparisons to make informed decisions.

最終，討論重點介紹了根據供應或單價價格而不是基本價值評估加密資產的問題。它強調，市場參與者必須超越表面級比較才能做出明智的決定。

The information presented in this article is for informational and educational purposes only. The article does not constitute financial advice or advice of any kind. Coin Edition is not responsible for any losses incurred as a result of the utilization of content, products, or services mentioned. Readers are advised to exercise caution before taking any action related to the company.

本文提供的信息僅用於信息和教育目的。本文不構成任何形式的財務建議或建議。由於提到的內容，產品或服務的利用，Coin Edition對任何損失概不負責。建議讀者在採取與公司相關的任何行動之前謹慎行事。