前4名分散的加密項目在2025年獲得勢頭：Blockdag，Solana，XRP和以太坊

仔細觀察到2025年的頂級分散加密挑選選件 - Blockdag，Solana，XRP和以太坊。探索將每個項目與眾不同的設置以及價值可能要何處的設置。

In the fast-moving world of crypto, attention spans are short. But even as new coins emerge, the platforms showing real use and technical progress tend to stick around.

在快速移動的加密世界中，注意力跨度很短。但是，即使新硬幣出現，展示實際使用和技術進步的平台也傾向於堅持下去。

Solana, XRP, Ethereum, and BlockDAG are among the decentralized networks that remain in the spotlight as 2025 rolls on. Each project is contributing to different areas of the space—whether it’s pushing transaction speed, handling larger-scale activity, or providing the platforms on which new applications are being built.

Solana，XRP，以太坊和Blockdag是隨著2025年滾動而保持焦點的分散網絡之一。每個項目都為空間的不同領域做出貢獻 - 無論是推動交易速度，處理更大範圍的活動，還是提供正在構建新應用程序的平台。

This overview highlights what’s powering their momentum—and why each is being considered a top decentralized crypto pick moving into the next market cycle.

這一概述突出了他們的勢頭的能力，以及為什麼每個人都被視為最高分散的加密貨幣選秀權進入下一個市場週期。

1. BlockDAG: Milestones and Infrastructure Are Driving Interest Involving several unnamed crypto lenders in a lawsuit against venture capitalists and firms Union Bank and Trinity Capital, a report by The Information claims that the lenders invested in risky crypto startups hoping for huge returns—but instead face huge losses.

1。 Blockdag：里程碑和基礎設施正在引起利息，涉及幾個未命名的加密貸款人，以針對風險投資家和公司聯合銀行和Trinity Capital進行訴訟，這些信息聲稱，貸款人投資了有風險的加密初創企業，希望獲得巨額回報，但相反，卻面臨巨大的損失。

The lawsuit, filed in a Delaware federal court last week, alleges that the lenders were misled by VCs into making disastrous investments in startups like FTX and BlockFi, which went bankrupt last year.

該訴訟上週在特拉華州聯邦法院提起訴訟，稱貸方被風險投資人誤以為對去年破產的FTX和Blockfi等初創公司進行災難性投資。

The lenders accuse the VCs of engaging in "fraudulent inducement" to get them to invest in risky tranches of debt issued by the startups, hoping to salvage some value from the bankruptcies.

貸方指責VCS參與“欺詐性誘因”，以使他們投資於初創公司發行的風險債務，希望從破產中挽救一些價值。

The complaint claims that the VCs "had no interest in the lenders' economic well-being." They allegedly pressured the lenders to participate in a final round of funding for FTX, knowing that the exchange was in "dire straits."

投訴稱，風險投資人“對貸方的經濟福祉沒有興趣”。據稱，他們迫使貸方參加FTX的最後一輪資金，因為他們知道交易所處於“可怕的海峽”中。

The lawsuit also alleges that the VCs threatened to withdraw their commitments if the lenders didn't join the last-minute funding round for FTX.

該訴訟還聲稱，如果貸方沒有加入FTX的最後一刻資金，風險投資人將撤回其承諾。

According to The Information, the lenders allegedly invested $150 million in tranches of debt issued by Union Bank and Trinity Capital, which in turn made investments in startups.

根據該信息，據稱，貸方向聯合銀行和三位一體資本發行的債務投資了1.5億美元，這反過來又對初創企業進行了投資。

The VCs allegedly told the lenders that the startups were "handpicked" and presented them as "elite" investment opportunities. However, the lenders later learned that the VCs were mainly interested in maximizing their own carry, which is a percentage of the profits above a preferred return for the VCs' fund.

據稱，風險投資人告訴貸方，這些初創公司是“精心挑選”的，並將其視為“精英”投資機會。但是，貸方後來了解到，風險投資人主要有興趣最大化自己的攜帶，這是VCS基金首選收益率高於利潤的百分比。

The lenders are now seeking to recover their investments, which they claim were lost due to the VCs' fraudulent misrepresentations.

貸方現在正在尋求收回其投資，他們聲稱由於風險投資人的欺詐性虛假陳述而丟失了。

The lawsuit highlights the opaque and risky nature of private credit markets in the crypto space, where lenders often face pressure from VCs to engage in risky ventures.

該訴訟強調了加密貨幣領域中私人信貸市場的不透明和風險性質，在那裡，貸方經常面臨VCS從事風險企業的壓力。

As the crypto winter continues, the legal battle between the lenders and VCs could have broader implications for the industry's recovery.

隨著Crypto Winter的繼續，貸方和VC之間的法律鬥爭可能會對該行業的恢復產生更大的影響。

The lawsuit is pending, and the VCs have yet to respond in court.

訴訟正在審理中，風險投資人尚未在法庭上做出回應。

The post Unnamed Crypto Lenders Sue VCs Over Risky Startup Investments, Report Says appeared first on Coin Center.

報告稱，該郵政未命名的加密貸款人對風險的創業投資提起訴訟。