Solana（Sol）是縮放分散融資（DEFI）的最佳區塊鏈

UNISWAP的創始人海頓·亞當斯（Hayden Adams）認為，索拉納（Solana）目前是在第1層級別擴展分散融資（DEFI）的最佳區塊鏈。

Hayden Adams, the founder of Uniswap, stated that Solana is currently making the best efforts to scale decentralized finance (DeFi) at the layer 1 level.

UNISWAP的創始人海登·亞當斯（Hayden Adams）表示，索拉納（Solana）目前正在盡最大努力在第1層的級別擴展分散融資（DEFI）。

What Is Being Said About Ethereum

關於以太坊的評價

This stance puts interesting spin on the ongoing debate about the limits of Ethereum’s modular model, especially as it pivots towards more reliance on layer 2 solutions.

這種立場使人們對以太坊模塊化模型的極限進行了有趣的辯論，尤其是在更多地依賴第2層解決方案時。

In a surprising move, Adams took to X to express his preference for Solana’s monolithic approach, focusing on direct and unified execution on the base layer.

令人驚訝的是，亞當斯（Adams）伸手去表達了他對索拉納（Solana）整體方法的偏愛，重點是基礎層上的直接執行和統一執行。

According to him, this vision aligns better with the urgent needs of DeFi to performant smart contracts and low transaction costs. He believes that returning to a robust and scalable layer 1 would be healthier for the ecosystem in the long term.

據他介紹，這種願景與Defi對錶現智能合約和低交易成本的緊急需求保持一致。他認為，從長遠來看，回到強大而可擴展的第1層對於生態系統來說更健康。

“Solana has a better roadmap, a better team, and a better approach for L1 DeFi. We need to get back to healthy L1s that can handle DeFi volume without an additional layer. L2s are an attempt to patch up a failing L1. It’ll be healthier in the long term to build a new L1 that can handle the load,” Adams stated.

“ Solana具有更好的路線圖，更好的團隊和更好的L1 Defi方法。我們需要回到可以處理不額外層的健康L1的健康L1中。L2S試圖修補失敗的L1。從長遠來看，它會更健康才能建立一個可以承受負載的新L1，” Adams表示。 ”

This position contrasts with that of David Hoffman (Bankless), a strong Ethereum advocate, who claims that no other blockchain can match the network's security and resilience. According to him, Ethereum L1 remains “the natural home” of DeFi, while L2s must play a role in congestion relief.

該立場與強大的以太坊倡導者戴維·霍夫曼（David Hoffman）（無岸）的立場形成鮮明對比，他聲稱沒有其他區塊鏈可以符合網絡的安全性和彈性。據他介紹，以太坊L1仍然是Defi的“自然家”，而L2S必須在擁塞救濟中發揮作用。

A Technical But Strategic Debate

技術但戰略性辯論

The difference in opinions between Adams and Hoffman reflects a deeper divide on the future of blockchain: should everything be built on a single base, or should functions be fragmented across multiple layers?

亞當斯（Adams）和霍夫曼（Hoffman）之間的意見差異反映了區塊鏈未來的更深層鴻溝：一切都應該在單個基礎上構建，還是應該在多個層中分散函數？

For Adams, the multiplication of L2s adds unnecessary complexity and dilutes the user experience. He thus calls for refocusing efforts on blockchains capable of natively handling DeFi volume without an additional layer.

對於亞當斯，L2的乘法增加了不必要的複雜性並稀釋了用戶體驗。因此，他呼籲將努力重新集中在能夠在沒有額外層的情況下本地處理defi體積的區塊鏈上。

In this view, Solana presents undeniable strengths: high throughput, low fees, and an increasingly mature development environment. Qualities that are attracting more and more DeFi projects seeking a high-performance alternative to Ethereum.

以這種觀點，Solana提出了不可否認的優勢：高吞吐量，低費用和越來越成熟的發展環境。吸引越來越多的挑戰項目的品質尋求以太坊的高性能替代品。

This vision contrasts with Ethereum’s modular approach, where applications are increasingly deployed on layer 2 solutions, prioritizing main layer security while seeking performance elsewhere.

該願景與以太坊的模塊化方法形成鮮明對比，在該方法中，應用程序越來越多地部署在第2層解決方案上，優先考慮主層安全性，同時在其他地方尋求績效。

Adams’ position suggests a more nuanced view of the blockchain landscape, where each platform could excel in specific areas. This perspective is even more interesting as Uniswap Labs recently launched Unichain, its own layer 2 solution on Ethereum, while deploying its version 4 across twelve different blockchain networks.

亞當斯（Adams）的立場表明，區塊鏈景觀的觀點更加細微，每個平台在特定區域中都可以表現出色。由於Uniswap Labs最近推出了Unichain，這是其在以太坊上的第2層解決方案，同時在十二個不同的區塊鍊網絡中部署其版本4，因此這種觀點更加有趣。

Uniswap: A Multi-Chain Strategy

UNISWAP：一種多鏈策略

The move to expand its flagship protocol to new platforms underscores Uniswap's broader ambitions to become a leading player in the DeFi space.

將其旗艦協議擴展到新平台的舉動強調了UNISWAP更廣泛的野心，成為Defi領域的領先參與者。

As the founder of one of the most successful DeFi protocols, Adams' thoughts carry weight in the ongoing discussion about the best architecture for scaling DeFi.

作為最成功的DEFI協議之一的創始人，Adams的思想在正在進行的有關擴展範圍的最佳體系結構的討論中具有重視。

Ultimately, the success of each platform will depend on its ability to attract developers and users, and in this domain, both Ethereum and Solana are fiercely competitive.

最終，每個平台的成功將取決於其吸引開發人員和用戶的能力，在該領域，以太坊和Solana都具有激烈的競爭力。

However, the fact that a prominent figure like Adams is expressing his preference for Solana over Ethereum is a testament to the growing interest in alternatives to the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM).

但是，像亞當斯這樣的著名人物表示對索拉納而不是以太坊的偏愛這一事實證明了對以太坊虛擬機（EVM）替代品的日益興趣。

As more and more DeFi protocols expand beyond Ethereum, we could see a shift in the balance of power within the industry, leading to a more diverse and competitive landscape for blockchain technology.

隨著越來越多的Defi協議擴展到以太坊之外，我們可以看到行業內部權力平衡的變化，從而導致區塊鏈技術的更多樣化和競爭性的格局。