關於以太坊的上層應用層需要良好的社會哲學

類比，布特林將C ++與以太坊進行了比較，指出C ++將保持不變，而不管有良好的社會哲學還是其他方式。

Vitalik Buterin, a co-founder of Ethereum, argued that “good social philosophy” is needed more for the upper application layer of Ethereum than for the lower infrastructure layer. He stated that apps built on the upper layer are a reflection of the developer’s motives, philosophy, ethics, and worldview. The lower layer is also influenced by these factors, but not as much. This is because the infrastructure layer must be abstract enough to run many apps, which are likely to have diverse motives and worldviews.

以太坊的聯合創始人維塔克·布特林（Vitalik Buterin）認為，以太坊的上層應用層比下層基礎設施層更需要“良好的社會哲學”。他說，在上層建立的應用程序反映了開發人員的動機，哲學，倫理和世界觀。下層也受這些因素的影響，但不大。這是因為基礎架構層必須足夠抽像以運行許多應用程序，這些應用程序可能具有多種動機和世界觀。

Buterin used C++ and Ethereum as an analogy. He explained that C++ would remain the same regardless of whether there was good social philosophy or otherwise. However, with Ethereum, good social ideas, such as environmental concerns, spurred many people to develop Proof of Stake technologies when most people were preoccupied with Proof of Work. He added that the lower layer is about 50% general purpose, whereas the upper app layer is about 80% special purpose. Along these lines, he concluded that your worldview more influences apps and should be the focus of good social philosophy.

Buterin使用C ++和以太坊作為類比。他解釋說，無論有良好的社會哲學還是其他方式，C ++將保持不變。但是，憑藉以太坊，良好的社會思想（例如環境問題），當大多數人全神貫注於工作證明時，許多人都刺激了許多人開發利益技術證明。他補充說，下層約為50％的通用目的，而上層應用程序層的特殊用途約為80％。沿著這些思路，他得出的結論是，您的世界觀更多地影響了應用程序，應該成為良好的社會哲學的重點。

When asked about the apps with bad social philosophy, Buterin mentioned FTX, Lunar Terra labs, and pump.fun. He stated that people started out making Polymarket to do interesting things like predict elections, but then they moved on to bigger and better things, using the prediction market to try to improve scientific research. In contrast, Pump. Fun started out launching memecoins and doesn't seem to be progressing any further, merely serving to support the Solana network's rug pulls. Buterin's view is that people who aren't interested in seeing society move toward good goals wouldn't bother making an application at all.

當被問及具有不良社會哲學的應用程序時，Buterin提到了FTX，Lunar Terra Labs和Pump.Fun。他說，人們開始製作Polymarket進行有趣的事情，例如預測選舉，但隨後他們使用預測市場來嘗試改善科學研究，從而發展到更大更好的事情。相反，泵。 Fun開始啟動Memecoins，似乎並沒有進一步發展，只是為了支持Solana Network的地毯拉力。 Buterin的觀點是，不感興趣的人看到社會朝著良好的目標邁進，根本不會打擾申請。

Ethereum's official account on X, formerly Twitter, posed the question of what the network's ethos was and which apps best represented this ethos. However, community support for this idea was limited, with many people expressing annoyance that Ethereum was focusing on philosophy rather than Layer 1 bread-and-butter problems such as scalability, transaction fees, and network speed. The question then becomes, what comes first, philosophy or technology? Many in the community believe that more people will adopt cypherpunk ideas if the technology works well, arguing that people care more about network performance and adoption than the social implications of the applications.

以太坊在X（以前是Twitter）上的官方帳戶提出了一個問題，即網絡的精神是什麼，哪些應用最能代表這種精神。但是，社區對這一想法的支持是有限的，許多人表示煩人以太坊專注於哲學，而不是第1層麵包和 - 淘汰問題，例如可擴展性，交易費用和網絡速度。然後，問題變成了，首先是哲學或技術？社區中的許多人認為，如果該技術運作良好，則更多的人會採用Cypherpunk的想法，認為人們更多地關心網絡性能和採用，而不是應用程序的社會含義。

Buterin's examples highlight how different philosophies can impact crypto projects. Polymarket began with interesting endeavors like predicting elections, which aligns with the broader goal of using technology for societal advancement. In contrast, Pump. Fun's activities, such as launching memecoins and supporting rug pulls, appear to prioritize short-term gains and exploit emerging trends, ultimately contributing to a chaotic and exploitative ecosystem.

Buterin的例子強調了不同的哲學如何影響加密項目。 Polymarket始於有趣的努力，例如預測選舉，這符合將技術用於社會發展的更廣泛的目標。相反，泵。 Fun的活動，例如推出Memecoins和支持地毯拉力，似乎優先考慮短期收益並利用新興趨勢，最終導致了混亂和剝削性的生態系統。

As memecoins on Solana's network faced difficulties, the platform faced backlash and community members began shutting down the project. This chaotic scenario unfolded as people engaged in degrading stunts, which were live-streamed on platforms like Twitch. But one could say the same about Ethereum at one point, at least in the sense that it had the most Ponzi schemes in the crypto market. But an Ethereum-based Ponzi token would be on the app layer, thus proving Buterin's point that the app layer is most vulnerable to the developer's worldview and social philosophy.

由於Solana網絡上的Memecoins面臨困難，該平檯面臨反彈，社區成員開始關閉該項目。這種混亂的場景隨著人們從事墮落的特技表演而展開，這些特技在Twitch之類的平台上進行了現場直播。但是，至少在某種意義上，它在加密貨幣市場中的龐氏騙局方案最多，人們可能會對以太坊說同樣的話。但是，基於以太坊的龐氏騙局將在應用程序層上，因此證明了Buterin的觀點，即應用程序層最容易受到開發人員的世界觀和社會哲學的影響。