关于以太坊的上层应用层需要良好的社会哲学

类比，布特林将C ++与以太坊进行了比较，指出C ++将保持不变，而不管有良好的社会哲学还是其他方式。

Vitalik Buterin, a co-founder of Ethereum, argued that “good social philosophy” is needed more for the upper application layer of Ethereum than for the lower infrastructure layer. He stated that apps built on the upper layer are a reflection of the developer’s motives, philosophy, ethics, and worldview. The lower layer is also influenced by these factors, but not as much. This is because the infrastructure layer must be abstract enough to run many apps, which are likely to have diverse motives and worldviews.

以太坊的联合创始人维塔克·布特林（Vitalik Buterin）认为，以太坊的上层应用层比下层基础设施层更需要“良好的社会哲学”。他说，在上层建立的应用程序反映了开发人员的动机，哲学，伦理和世界观。下层也受这些因素的影响，但不大。这是因为基础架构层必须足够抽象以运行许多应用程序，这些应用程序可能具有多种动机和世界观。

Buterin used C++ and Ethereum as an analogy. He explained that C++ would remain the same regardless of whether there was good social philosophy or otherwise. However, with Ethereum, good social ideas, such as environmental concerns, spurred many people to develop Proof of Stake technologies when most people were preoccupied with Proof of Work. He added that the lower layer is about 50% general purpose, whereas the upper app layer is about 80% special purpose. Along these lines, he concluded that your worldview more influences apps and should be the focus of good social philosophy.

Buterin使用C ++和以太坊作为类比。他解释说，无论有良好的社会哲学还是其他方式，C ++将保持不变。但是，凭借以太坊，良好的社会思想（例如环境问题），当大多数人全神贯注于工作证明时，许多人都刺激了许多人开发利益技术证明。他补充说，下层约为50％的通用目的，而上层应用程序层的特殊用途约为80％。沿着这些思路，他得出的结论是，您的世界观更多地影响了应用程序，应该成为良好的社会哲学的重点。

When asked about the apps with bad social philosophy, Buterin mentioned FTX, Lunar Terra labs, and pump.fun. He stated that people started out making Polymarket to do interesting things like predict elections, but then they moved on to bigger and better things, using the prediction market to try to improve scientific research. In contrast, Pump. Fun started out launching memecoins and doesn't seem to be progressing any further, merely serving to support the Solana network's rug pulls. Buterin's view is that people who aren't interested in seeing society move toward good goals wouldn't bother making an application at all.

当被问及具有不良社会哲学的应用程序时，Buterin提到了FTX，Lunar Terra Labs和Pump.Fun。他说，人们开始制作Polymarket进行有趣的事情，例如预测选举，但随后他们使用预测市场来尝试改善科学研究，从而发展到更大更好的事情。相反，泵。 Fun开始启动Memecoins，似乎并没有进一步发展，只是为了支持Solana Network的地毯拉力。 Buterin的观点是，不感兴趣的人看到社会朝着良好的目标迈进，根本不会打扰申请。

Ethereum's official account on X, formerly Twitter, posed the question of what the network's ethos was and which apps best represented this ethos. However, community support for this idea was limited, with many people expressing annoyance that Ethereum was focusing on philosophy rather than Layer 1 bread-and-butter problems such as scalability, transaction fees, and network speed. The question then becomes, what comes first, philosophy or technology? Many in the community believe that more people will adopt cypherpunk ideas if the technology works well, arguing that people care more about network performance and adoption than the social implications of the applications.

以太坊在X（以前是Twitter）上的官方帐户提出了一个问题，即网络的精神是什么，哪些应用最能代表这种精神。但是，社区对这一想法的支持是有限的，许多人表示烦人以太坊专注于哲学，而不是第1层面包和 - 淘汰问题，例如可扩展性，交易费用和网络速度。然后，问题变成了，首先是哲学或技术？社区中的许多人认为，如果该技术运作良好，则更多的人会采用Cypherpunk的想法，认为人们更多地关心网络性能和采用，而不是应用程序的社会含义。

Buterin's examples highlight how different philosophies can impact crypto projects. Polymarket began with interesting endeavors like predicting elections, which aligns with the broader goal of using technology for societal advancement. In contrast, Pump. Fun's activities, such as launching memecoins and supporting rug pulls, appear to prioritize short-term gains and exploit emerging trends, ultimately contributing to a chaotic and exploitative ecosystem.

Buterin的例子强调了不同的哲学如何影响加密项目。 Polymarket始于有趣的努力，例如预测选举，这符合将技术用于社会发展的更广泛的目标。相反，泵。 Fun的活动，例如推出Memecoins和支持地毯拉力，似乎优先考虑短期收益并利用新兴趋势，最终导致了混乱和剥削性的生态系统。

As memecoins on Solana's network faced difficulties, the platform faced backlash and community members began shutting down the project. This chaotic scenario unfolded as people engaged in degrading stunts, which were live-streamed on platforms like Twitch. But one could say the same about Ethereum at one point, at least in the sense that it had the most Ponzi schemes in the crypto market. But an Ethereum-based Ponzi token would be on the app layer, thus proving Buterin's point that the app layer is most vulnerable to the developer's worldview and social philosophy.

由于Solana网络上的Memecoins面临困难，该平台面临反弹，社区成员开始关闭该项目。这种混乱的场景随着人们从事堕落的特技表演而展开，这些特技在Twitch之类的平台上进行了现场直播。但是，至少在某种意义上，它在加密货币市场中的庞氏骗局方案最多，人们可能会对以太坊说同样的话。但是，基于以太坊的庞氏骗局将在应用程序层上，因此证明了Buterin的观点，即应用程序层最容易受到开发人员的世界观和社会哲学的影响。