蘇格蘭必須利用其能源資源來保護其未來

如果沒有進步，在阿伯丁（Aberdeen）擁有代幣的行政辦公室（與曼徹斯特的老闆在一起）將對蘇格蘭進行賠償很少

A strategic energy supply plan for Scotland would immediately commit to the Acorn CCS project (which the UK Government initially backed) as pivotal to both environmentally exploiting oil and gas resources and sustaining the future of Grangemouth as an energy hub.

蘇格蘭的一項戰略能源供應計劃將立即致力於ACORN CCS項目（英國政府最初支持的），這是對環境利用石油和天然氣資源的關鍵，並維持格蘭格茅斯作為能源樞紐的未來。

Further development of wind and solar energy resources (beyond Scotland’s basic requirements and besides a progressive move to “zonal pricing”) would ensure “excess energy” did not lead to higher energy bills due to “constraint payments” to wind farm operators but fuelled hydrogen generation, back-up power generation and export to neighbouring countries.

防風和太陽能資源的進一步發展（超越蘇格蘭的基本要求，除了逐步轉移到“區域定價”之外）將確保“多餘的能源”不會導致更高的能源費用，這是由於向風電場運營商的“約束付款”，但助長了氫氣。產生，備用發電和出口到鄰國。

Localised energy generation projects, such as community heating, would be prioritised, while new research and development would seek to harness tidal power in an efficient and nature-friendly manner as nuclear power (with inherent and significant safety concerns) was phased out.

將優先考慮本地化的能源生成項目，例如社區供暖，而新的研發將試圖以有效且自然友好的方式利用潮汐力量，因為核電（存在固有和重大的安全問題）被淘汰。

Comprehensive planning aimed at optimising the exploitation of Scotland’s energy resources will benefit both Scotland and the rest of the UK irrespective of political and constitutional changes.

旨在優化蘇格蘭能源資源的剝削的綜合計劃將使蘇格蘭和英國其他地區受益，而與政治和憲法變化無關。

Stan Grodynski Longniddry, East Lothian

東洛錫安的Stan Grodynski Longniddry

TO protect the planet, we must keep the increase in temperature compared to pre-industrial levels to below 1.5C. Industries like solar, wind and battery storage must expand rapidly, and fossil fuels must stay in the ground.

為了保護地球，我們必須將溫度升高與工業前水平相比，至1.5C以下。諸如太陽能，風能和電池存儲等行業必須迅速擴展，化石燃料必須留在地面上。

Much has been written about the need to retrain workers already in carbon-intensive industries for a planned transition into decent green employment.

關於需要培訓已經在碳密集型行業中的工人進行培訓，以實現綠色就業的過渡。

READ MORE: 'Beyond belief': SNP slam Ian Murray Grangemouth claim

閱讀更多：“超越信仰”：SNP猛擊伊恩·默里·格蘭格茅斯（Ian Murray Grangemouth）

This means that Rachel Reeves’s plans for growth, growth and growth have to be thrown O-U-T out! We need long-term job creation, resilience and sustainability to withstand health, climate and economic shocks. Transitions take time, resources and vision.

這意味著雷切爾·里夫斯（Rachel Reeves）的增長，增長和增長計劃必須被淘汰！我們需要長期創造就業，韌性和可持續性來承受健康，氣候和經濟衝擊。過渡需要時間，資源和願景。

What we need to think about is re-opening ALL old railway lines, FREE public transport everywhere in the UK, FREE solar panels on every roof in the UK, FREE insulation for every property in the UK and FUNDED retraining into guaranteed green work schemes for younger workers.

我們需要考慮的是重新開放所有舊鐵路線路，英國各地的免費公共交通工具，英國每個屋頂上的免費太陽能電池板，英國每個物業的免費絕緣材料，並資助了對保證的綠色工作計劃的資助年輕工人。

READ MORE: Customers are being 'gaslit' over UK energy price increases

閱讀更多：客戶在英國能源價格上漲時正在“加油”

Education providers must start offering courses to equip a new generation of engineers, construction workers, plumbers, metalworkers, architects and others to be part of a low-carbon future. Work must always provide living wages, and safe working conditions.

教育提供者必須開始提供課程，以配備新一代的工程師，建築工人，水管工，金屬工人，建築師等，以成為低碳未來的一部分。工作必須始終提供生活工資和安全的工作條件。

Rachel Reeves and her boss must stop going on about growth and start realising the planet is on fire and no number of targets are going fix it. Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result. Growth has got us to where we are at, and we don’t want or need any more of it.

雷切爾·里夫斯（Rachel Reeves）和她的老闆必須停止繼續增長，並開始意識到地球著火了，沒有任何目標解決。精神錯亂一遍又一遍地做同樣的事情，並期望產生不同的結果。增長使我們進入了我們所處的位置，我們不需要或需要更多。

Margaret Forbes Blanefield

瑪格麗特·福布斯·布萊恩菲爾德

WHEN considering whether to let the NHS become increasingly private, consider this: half a million US citizens are bankrupted each year because they cannot pay their health bills. With that will come loss of home, vehicles, any chance of children attaining higher education and probably also the chance of future health care. Why don’t you ask Wes Streeting to help you out if you need a procedure? Ask not for whom the ambulance calls; it calls not for thee.

當考慮是否讓NHS變得越來越私密時，請考慮：一半的美國公民每年破產，因為他們無法支付健康賬單。隨之而來的是失去家庭，車輛，兒童獲得高等教育的機會，也可能是未來醫療保健的機會。如果您需要一個程序，為什麼不要求Wes Streeting幫助您？不要問救護車打電話給誰；它不呼籲您。

M Ross Aviemore

羅斯·阿維莫爾（M Ross Aviemore）

THOSE who say we shouldn’t be critical of SNP cos they are the only party that can deliver it are the same folk who say nothing about the ten years when nothing at all was done.

那些說我們不應該批評SNP cos的人，他們是唯一一個可以交付它的政黨的人是對十年一無所獲的人說一無所獲的人。

They can’t face the reality of what’s happened to their party, just like many of us couldn’t face the truth about union.

他們不能面對他們政黨發生的事情的現實，就像我們許多人無法面對有關工會的真相一樣。

If they want criticism of the party to stop, then they had better tell the party of independence to get serious and stop leading us all on with promises they don’t intend to keep.

如果他們想批評該黨停止，那麼他們最好告訴獨立黨認真對待，並以他們不打算保留的諾言停止我們所有人。

READ MORE:  Mistakes were made, but we must now find a way forward to independence

閱讀更多：犯錯誤，但我們現在必須找到前進的道路

The SNP know a General Election can be used and Westminster can do nothing to stop us, but they don’t want to do that, they would rather wait for an agreement that they know will never come.

SNP知道可以使用大選，威斯敏斯特無能為力，但他們不想這樣做，他們寧願等待他們知道永遠不會達成的協議。

The day they get serious on the supposed main goal is the day the critics stop criticising and start shouting their support again.

他們認真對待所謂的主要目標的那一天是批評家停止批評並再次大喊大叫的那一天。

Bill Robertson via email

比爾·羅伯遜（Bill Robertson）通過電子郵件

PAT Harvie describes Jordan’s Peterson as fronting “reactionary and toxic” politics, and, if you can decipher anything lucid from Peterson’s verbiage, that’s probably true. However even Peterson can be right sometimes, and in calling out the very dodgy Hate Crime Bill and gender recognition reform nonsense he is probably in line with many of the Scots who are perplexed and dismayed by sinister legislation designed to limit free speech.

帕特·哈希（Pat Harvie）將約旦的彼得森（Peterson）描述為“反動和有毒”政治，如果您可以從彼得森（Peterson）的語言中解讀任何清醒的東西，那可能是事實。但是，有時甚至彼得森也可能是正確的，並且在提出非常狡猾的仇恨犯罪法案和性別認可改革時，他可能與許多蘇格蘭人一致，這些蘇格蘭人被旨在限制言論自由的險惡立法所困擾和沮喪。

Jim Butchart via email

Jim Butchart通過電子郵件