儘管裁定XRP本身不是安全性，但大多數數字資產不是證券

辛西婭·盧米斯（Cynthia Lummis）參議員是加密貨幣立法的倡導者，最近在X上指出，大多數數字資產不是Howey測試下的證券。

Senator Cynthia Lummis has sparked discussion on X about the status of digital assets as securities, drawing a response from attorney Bill Morgan.

參議員辛西婭·盧米斯（Cynthia Lummis）引發了X關於數字資產作為證券的地位的討論，並提出了律師比爾·摩根（Bill Morgan）的回應。

Senator Cynthia Lummis, a Republican from Wyoming and a known advocate for cryptocurrency legislation, stated on X that "most" digital assets are not securities under the Howey test.

懷俄明州的共和黨參議員辛西婭·盧米斯（Cynthia Lummis）也是X上的加密貨幣立法倡導者，他在X上指出，“大多數”數字資產不是Howey測試下的證券。

Her comments follow a congressional hearing on digital assets, where lawmakers touched upon the U.S.’s slow progress in establishing clear guidelines for the crypto industry, contrasting with the EU’s swift integration of crypto through MiCA.

她的評論是在國會關於數字資產的聽證會之後，立法者在建立加密貨幣行業的明確指南方面涉及美國的進展緩慢，與歐盟通過MICA迅速整合了加密貨幣。

Lummis also highlighted the role of stablecoins in modernizing payments.

盧米斯還強調了穩定幣在現代化付款中的作用。

However, her assertion that most cryptocurrencies are not securities has raised questions about the SEC’s approach to enforcement, particularly in its case against Ripple.

但是，她認為大多數加密貨幣不是證券的說法都提出了有關SEC執行方法的疑問，尤其是在針對Ripple的情況下。

The Interoperability Initiative and Judge Torres’ Ruling

互操作性倡議和托雷斯法官的裁決

Lummis’s statement comes amid efforts to promote interoperability between U.S. and foreign legal frameworks for crypto.

盧米斯（Lummis）的說法是為了促進加密貨幣與外國法律框架之間的互操作性的努力。

Earlier this year, a bipartisan group of senators, including Lummis and Democrat Tim Kapoli, introduced the Interoperability, Inclusion, and Innovation Centered (I3) Framework.

今年早些時候，包括盧米斯（Lummis）和民主黨人蒂姆·卡普利（Tim Kapoli）在內的兩黨參議員介紹了以互操作性，包容性和創新為中心（i3）框架。

The initiative aims to streamline cooperation with trading partners in the digital asset space.

該計劃旨在簡化與數字資產領域的貿易合作夥伴的合作。

Lummis’s comments also follow Judge Analisa Torres’s ruling in July 2023 that XRP itself is not a security.

盧米斯（Lummis）的評論還遵循肛門托雷斯（Analisa Torres）法官在2023年7月的裁決，即XRP本身不是安全性。

Morgan Asks Lummis About Judge Torres’ Ruling

摩根向盧米斯詢問托雷斯法官的裁決

In response to Lummis’s statement, attorney Bill Morgan, known for his work in the SEC v. Ripple case, asked if the senator agrees with Judge Torres’s ruling.

在回應盧米斯的聲明時，律師比爾·摩根（Bill Morgan）因在Secv。Ripple案中的工作而聞名，他詢問參議員是否同意托雷斯法官的裁決。

“Does Senator Lummis agree with Judge Torres’s ruling that XRP is not a security in the SEC v. Ripple case?”

“盧米斯參議員是否同意托雷斯法官的裁決，即XRP不是Secv。Ripple案中的安全？”

This question directly challenges the SEC’s claims that most cryptocurrencies are securities.

這個問題直接挑戰了SEC關於大多數加密貨幣是證券的說法。

The judge’s ruling, which found that certain institutional sales by Ripple violated securities laws, has since been appealed by the SEC.

法官的裁決發現，波紋違反了證券法的某些機構銷售，此後已向美國證券交易委員會提出上訴。

The agency is pushing for a broader interpretation of Section 77b(a)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933 to include all digital assets sold to raise capital.

該機構正在推動對1933年《美國證券法》第77B（a）（1）條的更廣泛解釋，以包括出售用於籌集資金的所有數字資產。

This suggests that Lummis’s statement and Judge Torres’s ruling are part of a broader debate over the role of the SEC in the digital asset industry.

這表明盧米斯的聲明和托雷斯法官的裁決是SEC在數字資產行業中的作用的更廣泛辯論的一部分。

Lawmakers Push for Legislation to Define Legal Status

立法者推動立法來定義法律地位

The U.S. remains behind other countries in crypto regulation, with the EU forging ahead in implementing clear frameworks through initiatives such as MiCA.

美國仍在加密法規中的其他國家落後，歐盟通過諸如雲母之類的計劃實施了清晰的框架，歐盟在實施清晰的框架方面奠定了基礎。

This lack of clear legislation has led to a regulatory gray zone, affecting crypto firms and stifling innovation.

缺乏明確的立法導致了一個監管灰色區域，影響了加密貨幣公司並扼殺創新。

Lawmakers, including Lummis, have repeatedly pushed for Congress to pass legislation to define the legal status of digital assets.

包括盧米斯在內的議員們一再敦促國會通過立法來定義數字資產的法律地位。

Lummis’s comments suggest support for a more streamlined approach to crypto regulation.

盧米斯（Lummis）的評論表明，支持更簡化的加密法規方法。

This contrasts with the SEC’s actions under former chair Gary Gensler, which stated that many cryptocurrencies qualify as securities, leading to enforcement actions against several firms.

這與前董事長加里·金斯勒（Gary Gensler）領導下的美國證券交易委員會（SEC）的行動形成鮮明對比，後者指出，許多加密貨幣有資格為證券，導致對多家公司的執法行動。

This approach has sparked criticism for being overly broad and hindering crypto adoption.

這種方法引發了批評，因為它過分廣泛和阻礙了加密貨幣。

The post Senator Lummis Says ‘Most' Digital Assets Are Not Securities, Sparking Discussion on Judge Torres’s Ruling appeared first on Coin Edition.

參議員盧米斯（Lummis）表示，“大多數”數字資產不是證券，引發了托雷斯法官裁決的討論，首先出現在硬幣版上。