|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ripple 和 SEC 之間關於 XRP 的法律鬥爭一直是一場曠日持久的鬧劇。先前的法院裁決發現,使用 XRP 進行零售交易
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed an appeal against Ripple just after its original deadline passed. This appeal, submitted 24 hours late, targets specific aspects of the ongoing lawsuit.
美國證券交易委員會(SEC)在原定截止日期過後不久就對 Ripple 提起上訴。該上訴遲到了 24 小時提交,針對的是正在進行的訴訟的具體方面。
The SEC’s appeal focuses on Ripple’s programmatic sales of XRP and actions by company executives Brad Garlinghouse and Chris Larsen.
SEC 的上訴重點在於 Ripple 對 XRP 的程序化銷售以及公司高管 Brad Garlinghouse 和 Chris Larsen 的行動。
The legal battle between Ripple and the SEC over XRP has been a long, drawn-out drama. A previous court ruling found that retail transactions with XRP were not a security. However, the SEC is investigating Ripple’s sales of XRP via digital platforms and the involvement of its executives.
Ripple 和 SEC 之間關於 XRP 的法律鬥爭一直是一場曠日持久的鬧劇。先前的一項法院裁決發現,XRP 的零售交易不是證券。然而,美國證券交易委員會正在調查 Ripple 透過數位平台銷售 XRP 的情況及其高階主管的參與情況。
Ripple Executives Remain Confident Amid SEC Appeal
Ripple 高層在 SEC 上訴中保持信心
The SEC’s latest filing makes no headway in fighting the earlier ruling that XRP is not a security. The appeal focuses instead on sales of XRP on programmatic terms and the actions of Ripple’s leadership. The SEC also alleges that executives aided in the distribution of XRP and helped with cash and non-cash transactions.
美國證券交易委員會的最新文件在對抗先前關於 XRP 不是證券的裁決方面沒有取得任何進展。相反,該呼籲的重點是 XRP 的程序化銷售以及 Ripple 領導層的行動。 SEC 還指控高層協助分發 XRP 並協助進行現金和非現金交易。
That has raised questions about whether the SEC is on the right track by appealing just a few cases. Though Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer, Stuart Alderoty, anticipated this outcome, he contended any security status dispute of XRP was non-contestable. Ripple executives remain unperturbed on the case and believe their stance remains strong.
這引發了人們的疑問:美國證券交易委員會僅對少數案件提出上訴是否走在正確的軌道上。儘管 Ripple 的首席法律官 Stuart Alderoty 預料到了這一結果,但他認為 XRP 的任何安全狀態爭議都是無可爭議的。 Ripple 高層對此案依然泰然自若,並相信他們的立場依然堅定。
Crypto Community Questions SEC’s Filing Timeliness
加密貨幣社群質疑 SEC 提交文件的及時性
The confusion surrounding the filing deadline has added another layer of complexity to the case. Some crypto community members believe the SEC missed its opportunity to appeal when it didn’t make it by the original October 16 deadline. But after a series of back-and-forth discussions over the SEC’s Form C, it became clear the SEC had another Form C window.
圍繞提交截止日期的混亂為案件增添了另一層複雜性。一些加密貨幣社群成員認為,SEC 未能在原定的 10 月 16 日截止日期前提出上訴,因此錯過了上訴的機會。但在對 SEC 的 C 表格進行一系列反覆討論後,很明顯 SEC 還有另一個 C 表格視窗。
Complications multiplied when the SEC’s filing revealed two conflicting dates of the company’s founding, Oct. 16 and 17, sparking talk of a procedural kerfuffle. The irony is that the factors leading observers to question the discrepancy among legal experts may have ironically been the docketing lag that allowed it. However, the court officially accepted the appeal on October 17.
當 SEC 的文件披露了該公司成立的兩個相互矛盾的日期(10 月 16 日和 17 日)時,情況變得更加複雜,引發了有關程序混亂的討論。諷刺的是,導致觀察家質疑法律專家之間差異的因素可能是允許這種差異的歸檔滯後。不過,法院於10月17日正式受理上訴。
SEC Tightens Focus on Larsen and Garlinghouse
美國證券交易委員會加強對拉森和加林豪斯的關注
Larsen and Garlinghouse are again in the SEC’s crosshairs as the agency refocuses its efforts. They’re accused of funding the distribution of XRP directly through the sale and by paying employees. The SEC continues to argue against Ripple in this legal battle over XRP’s alleged involvement.
隨著該機構重新調整工作重點,拉森和加林豪斯再次成為 SEC 的瞄準目標。他們被指控直接透過銷售和支付員工薪水來資助 XRP 的分發。 SEC 繼續在這場關於 XRP 涉嫌參與的法律訴訟中與 Ripple 進行爭論。
In spite of these allegations, the SEC has opted not to pursue overturning Ripple’s $125 million fine or seeking disgorgement, which limits the scope of its appeal. The XRP community, on the other hand, remains anxious over the case’s unresolved legal status.
儘管有這些指控,SEC 仍選擇不推翻 Ripple 1.25 億美元的罰款或尋求返還贓物款,這限制了其上訴範圍。另一方面,XRP 社群仍然對該案懸而未決的法律地位感到焦慮。
Many view the SEC’s legal strategy in the Ripple case as part of a broader regulatory approach toward the crypto industry. However, the agency’s heavy reliance on enforcement actions has been criticized, particularly as it attempts to define digital assets. Recently, the SEC has faced lawsuits from Binance, Kraken, and Coinbase over the term “crypto asset security.”
許多人將 SEC 在 Ripple 案中的法律策略視為對加密產業更廣泛監管方法的一部分。然而,該機構對執法行動的嚴重依賴受到了批評,特別是當它試圖定義數位資產時。最近,SEC 因「加密資產安全」一詞面臨幣安、Kraken 和 Coinbase 的訴訟。
The Ripple case, in particular, has also highlighted the SEC’s difficulties in maintaining a consistent regulatory stance. The agency now maintains that XRP is not a security in retail transactions, despite earlier claims to the contrary. Critics argue that the SEC’s enforcement-driven approach lacks clear regulatory guidance and has resulted in lengthy legal battles.
尤其是瑞波幣案,也突顯了美國證券交易委員會在維持一致監管立場的困難。該機構現在堅稱 XRP 不是零售交易中的證券,儘管之前有相反的說法。批評者認為,美國證券交易委員會的執法驅動方法缺乏明確的監管指導,並導致了漫長的法律鬥爭。
免責聲明:info@kdj.com
所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!
如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。
-
- FXGuys 成為下一個大型加密貨幣頭銜的競爭者
- 2024-10-19 22:25:01
- 山寨幣市場正在不斷發展,人們的注意力從迷因幣轉移到更多實用性驅動的加密貨幣,例如去中心化金融(DeFi)代幣。
-
- 隨著加密貨幣市場錄得巨大收益,DOGE 引領 Meme 幣復甦
- 2024-10-19 22:25:01
- 加密貨幣市場本週錄得巨大漲幅,多項資產達到兩位數。比特幣(BTC)、山寨幣和模因幣跟隨上漲