支持 Ripple 的律師提供了 XRP 與 SEC 案件的最新情況：“我們不會退縮！”

如果加密貨幣領域之外的人問你現在該行業最熱門的話題是什麼，答案很簡單：XRP。

Pro-crypto lawyers are providing updates on the latest developments in the XRP vs. SEC case. Here's a summary of their insights:

支持加密貨幣的律師正在提供有關 XRP 與 SEC 案件最新進展的最新資訊。以下是他們的見解摘要：

- Lawyer James K. Filan reported that the SEC has filed its opening brief in the appeal.

- 律師 James K. Filan 報告稱，SEC 已在上訴中提交了開庭簡報。

- Pro-crypto lawyer Jeremy Hogan shared his analysis of the initial Ripple v. SEC appeal brief.

- 支持加密貨幣的律師 Jeremy Hogan 分享了他對 Ripple v. SEC 上訴摘要的分析。

- According to Hogan, the SEC brief challenges the previous court ruling that categorized XRP as a non-security during trades on public exchanges.

- 根據 Hogan 的說法，SEC 的簡報對先前法院的裁決提出了質疑，該裁決將 XRP 在公共交易所的交易中歸類為非證券。

- The SEC argues that all XRP transactions should be classified as unregistered securities offerings.

- SEC 認為所有 XRP 交易都應歸類為未註冊的證券發行。

- Hogan highlighted that the SEC is using Ripple’s marketing efforts to argue that investors anticipated profits from their investments in XRP.

- Hogan 強調，SEC 正在利用 Ripple 的行銷努力來證明投資者預期從 XRP 投資中獲利。

- Previously, the SEC alleged that Ripple executives misled investors by touting XRP as an investment that could generate substantial gains.

- 在此之前，美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 指控 Ripple 高層將 XRP 宣傳為可產生巨額收益的投資，從而誤導了投資者。

- However, the court ruled that the SEC's claims were too vague and failed to adequately demonstrate that XRP investors were motivated by an expectation of profits from Ripple's efforts.

- 然而，法院裁定 SEC 的說法過於模糊，未能充分證明 XRP 投資者的動機是期望從 Ripple 的努力中獲利。

- The SEC's appeal now aims to overturn this decision by presenting a more refined argument.

- SEC 現在的上訴旨在透過提出更完善的論點來推翻這一決定。

- Hogan stated that the SEC's argument appears to be that XRP investors' anticipation of profits from Ripple's efforts is evident from the company's marketing materials.

- Hogan 表示，SEC 的論點似乎是，從該公司的行銷資料中可以明顯看出 XRP 投資者對 Ripple 努力的利潤的預期。

- He noted that this argument is being made in the context of a legal standard known as the Howey Test, which determines whether an investment contract, and thus a security, exists based on several factors.

- 他指出，這一論點是在稱為豪伊測試的法律標準的背景下提出的，該標準根據幾個因素確定投資合約以及證券是否存在。

- Hogan further explained that the SEC's argument seems to be that XRP investors' anticipation of profits from Ripple's efforts can be inferred from the company's marketing materials, which is relevant to the Howey Test.

- Hogan 進一步解釋說，SEC 的論點似乎是，XRP 投資者對 Ripple 努力的利潤預期可以從該公司的行銷資料中推斷出來，這與 Howey 測試相關。

- Pro-crypto lawyer John Deaton shared his thoughts on the SEC's appeal, highlighting the agency's claim that XRP investors' anticipation of profits from Ripple's efforts is evident from the company's marketing materials.

- 支持加密貨幣的律師 John Deaton 分享了他對 SEC 上訴的看法，強調該機構聲稱，從該公司的營銷材料中可以明顯看出 XRP 投資者對 Ripple 努力的利潤預期。

- Deaton pointed out that the SEC's argument appears to be that XRP investors' anticipation of profits from Ripple's efforts is evident from the company's marketing materials, which is relevant to the Howey Test.

- Deaton 指出，SEC 的論點似乎是，XRP 投資者對 Ripple 努力中利潤的預期從該公司的行銷資料中可以明顯看出，這與 Howey 測試相關。

- He noted that this argument is being made in the context of a legal standard known as the Howy Test, which determines whether an investment contract, and thus a security, exists based on several factors.

- 他指出，這一論點是在稱為 Howy 測試的法律標準的背景下提出的，該標準根據幾個因素確定投資合約以及證券是否存在。

- Deaton highlighted that the SEC's argument seems to be that XRP investors' anticipation of profits from Ripple's efforts is evident from the company's marketing materials.

- Deaton 強調，SEC 的論點似乎是 XRP 投資者對 Ripple 努力的利潤的預期從該公司的行銷資料中可以明顯看出。

- He further stated that the SEC's argument appears to be that XRP investors' anticipation of profits from Ripple's efforts is evident from the company's marketing materials, which is relevant to the Howey Test.

- 他進一步表示，SEC 的論點似乎是，XRP 投資者對 Ripple 努力中利潤的預期從該公司的行銷資料中可以明顯看出，這與 Howey 測試相關。

- Pro-crypto lawyer Bill Hinman's speech on digital assets is also being discussed in relation to the XRP case.

- 支持加密貨幣的律師 Bill Hinman 關於數位資產的演講也與 XRP 案件有關。

- Hinman's speech, delivered in 2018, addressed the application of federal securities laws to digital assets and included his personal views on whether Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH) met the definition of a security at the time.

- Hinman 在 2018 年發表的演講討論了聯邦證券法對數位資產的適用，並包含了他對比特幣 (BTC) 和以太幣 (ETH) 是否符合當時證券定義的個人看法。

- Hinman's speech is significant because it provided guidance on the SEC's approach to classifying digital assets and highlighted the agency's stance on BTC and ETH being not securities.

- Hinman 的演講意義重大，因為它為 SEC 的數位資產分類方法提供了指導，並強調了該機構對 BTC 和 ETH 不屬於證券的立場。

- However, Hinman's speech also included a disclaimer, stating that his views did not necessarily represent those of the SEC and were subject to change.

- 然而，Hinman 的演講還包含免責聲明，指出他的觀點不一定代表 SEC 的觀點，並且可能會發生變化。

- Pro-crypto lawyer Jeremy Hogan shared his thoughts on Hinman's speech, highlighting its importance in the XRP case.

- 支持加密貨幣的律師 Jeremy Hogan 分享了他對 Hinman 演講的看法，強調了其在 XRP 案件中的重要性。

- According to Hogan, the SEC's argument in the XRP case is that XRP investors' anticipation of profits from Ripple's efforts is evident from the company's marketing materials.

- 根據 Hogan 的說法，SEC 在 XRP 案件中的論點是，從該公司的行銷資料中可以明顯看出 XRP 投資者對 Ripple 努力的利潤的預期。

- However, Hogan argues that the SEC's own Hinman speech, which addressed the application of federal securities laws to digital assets, suggests otherwise.

- 然而，Hogan 認為 SEC 自己的 Hinman 演講（該演講討論了聯邦證券法對數位資產的適用）表明了相反的觀點。

- Hinman's speech, delivered in 2018, included his personal views on whether BTC and ETH met the definition of a security at the time.

- Hinman 在 2018 年發表的演講中包含了他對 BTC 和 ETH 是否符合當時證券定義的個人看法。

- In his speech, Hinman stated that, based on his assessment of the facts and circumstances at the time, he did not believe that BTC or ETH met the definition of a security under federal securities laws.

- Hinman 在演講中表示，根據他對當時事實和情況的評估，他不認為 BTC 或 ETH 符合聯邦證券法下的證券定義。

- Hogan highlights that Hinman's speech is relevant to the XRP case because it provides insight into the SEC's approach to classifying digital assets and the application of securities laws.

- Hogan 強調，Hinman 的演講與 XRP 案件相關，因為它提供了對 SEC 數位資產分類方法和證券法應用的深入了解。

- Specifically, Hogan argues that Hinman's statement regarding BTC and ETH not being securities could potentially be used to support the argument that XRP, which was also trading during the period covered by Hinman's speech, should not be classified as a security either.

- 具體來說，Hogan 認為，Hinman 關於 BTC 和 ETH 不屬於證券的聲明可能會被用來支持這樣的論點：XRP 在 Hinman 演講期間也在交易，也不應該被歸類為證券。

- Pro-crypto lawyer Bill Hinman's speech on digital assets, which addressed the application of federal securities laws to digital assets, is being discussed in relation to the XRP case.

- 支持加密貨幣的律師 Bill Hinman 關於數位資產的演講涉及聯邦證券法對數位資產的適用，目前正在與 XRP 案件相關的討論。

- Hinman's speech, delivered in 2

- Hinman 的演講，分 2 小時發表