從普林斯頓到協議：OffChain Labs首席執行官史蒂文·戈德弗德（Steven Goldfeder）如何發明仲裁

OffChain Labs首席執行官Steven Goldfeder的Crypto Story Story是經典Geek Gold。作為普林斯頓的學生，他在2013年首次聽到了比特幣

In the heart of Princeton, as students gathered for a visit day in 2013, a tale unfolded that would later become classic crypto geek folklore. Professor Ed Felten—the future inventor of rollups on Ethereum, co-founder of Arbitrum and a White House science advisor—gave a five-minute lightning talk on the cost of a government destroying Bitcoin.

在普林斯頓的心臟地帶，當學生聚集在2013年的訪問日時，一個故事展開了，後來成為經典的Crypto Geek Folklore。埃德·費爾滕（Ed Felten）教授是以太坊的未來發明者，仲裁的聯合創始人和白宮科學顧問，他就政府破壞比特幣的成本進行了五分鐘的閃電演講。

Among the audience was Steven Goldfeder, Offchain Labs CEO, whose curiosity was piqued. That night, other students hosted a poker game with a 0.5 BTC buy-in.

觀眾中有史蒂文·戈德弗德（Steven Goldfeder），Offchain Labs首席執行官，他的好奇心被激發了。那天晚上，其他學生以0.5 BTC的支持舉辦了一款撲克遊戲。

“That was back in the days when that was just ten bucks. If only I’d held onto it…,” muses Goldfeder.

“那是在只有十美元的日子裡。

Now, as Arbitrum faces competition from faster rollups like MegaETH, which already boast 20,000 TPS on testnet, and Coinbase's Base, which is rapidly gaining attention, it seems that some of the technology underpinning Arbitrum might not be necessary after all.

現在，隨著仲裁面臨來自Megaeth等更快的匯總的競爭，Megaeth已經在TestNet上擁有20,000 TPS，而Coinbase的基礎迅速引起了人們的注意，似乎某些技術基礎的某些技術畢竟可能是不必要的。

As explained in January during a lively session on the ‘sequencing call’—a monthly meeting of major optimistic rollup teams—Arbitrum could be integrating the core technology for "based" optimistic rollups, a concept proposed by Ethereum Foundation researchers to introduce interoperability and composability among L2s.

正如一月份在一次關於“測序呼叫”（每月一次樂觀的滾動團隊的每月會議）的熱鬧會議上所解釋的，Arbitrum可能會整合“基於”的樂觀匯總的核心技術，這是以太坊基金會研究人員提出的一個概念，以在L2之間介紹互操作性和合成性。

However, in a recent interview with Magazine, Goldfeder expressed skepticism about Arbitrum adopting the tech.

但是，在最近接受雜誌採訪時，Goldfeder對採用該技術的仲裁表示懷疑。

“Just to clarify the terms, you know, a based rollup is basically a rollup without a sequencer that uses Ethereum for sequencing. Actually, if you look at that initial Arbitrum paper that we wrote in 2018, you might call it a based rollup. It doesn't have a sequencer; that only came later,” said Goldfeder.

“只是為了澄清術語，您知道，基本的匯總基本上是一個沒有音序的捲曲，它使用以太坊進行測序。實際上，如果您查看我們在2018年寫的那個初始的仲裁紙，您可能會稱其為基於匯總。它沒有序列的序列；它只有以後才會出現，” Goldfeder說。

“And one thing we experiment in is different execution models. So, Arbitrum is fully EVM but also has something called Stylus, which gives you the ability to write smart contracts in other languages such as Rust, C and C++.

“我們實驗的一件事是不同的執行模型。因此，仲裁是完全EVM，但也有名為手寫筆的東西，它使您能夠用其他語言（例如Rust，c和c ++）編寫智能合約。

“But I think having put this system in production for four years, in different testnet phases, I think the design that we’ve come on is actually the correct one.

“但是我認為將該系統投入生產四年，在不同的測試網階段，我認為我們所採用的設計實際上是正確的。

“So, I don’t think Arbitrum will become a based rollup anytime soon, and I don’t think that it should when it comes to native execution.”

“因此，我認為仲裁不會很快成為基於的匯總，而且我認為在本地執行方面也不應該。”

After the interview was conducted, Magazine decided to seek further clarification and context from Arbitrum on its position.

採訪後，雜誌決定尋求進一步的澄清和背景，從仲裁就其立場上尋求。

Regarding the chances of his L2 becoming a based rollup, Goldfeder confirmed in a statement that he believes Arbitrum’s current design is “more efficient, practical, and cost-effective” than based rollup designs.

關於他的L2成為基於匯總的機會，Goldfeder在一份聲明中證實，他認為索意專家的目前設計“比基於匯總的設計更有效，更實用和具有成本效益”。

“I support Vitalik’s view of native rollopu, which envisions a common core that we factor out that will be useful by many rollups, but also provides for rollups to extend that with additional features. Some rollups may choose to stop at the common core, but it’s crucial that we also support continued innovation and experimentation at the execution layer,” he said.

他說：“我支持Vitalik對本地Rollopu的看法，該觀點設想了一個共同的核心，我們將許多滾動都有用，但也規定了匯總以擴展其其他功能。有些匯總可能會選擇停止在Common Core上，但至關重要的是，我們也至關重要的是，我們也支持在執行層進行持續的創新和實驗，”他說。

The interview continues below:

採訪繼續下面：

At the heart of Princeton University, a tale unfolded that would later become classic crypto geek folklore. As students gathered for visit day in 2013, Professor Ed Felten—the future inventor of rollups on Ethereum, co-founder of Arbitrum and a White House science advisor—gave a five-minute lightning talk on the cost of a government destroying Bitcoin.

在普林斯頓大學的核心中，一個故事展開了，後來成為經典的加密吉普車民俗。當學生聚集在2013年的訪問日時，Ed Felten教授是以太坊的未來發明者，仲裁的聯合創始人和白宮科學顧問，他就政府銷毀比特幣的成本進行了五分鐘的閃電演講。

Among the audience was Steven Goldfeder, now CEO of Offchain Labs, whose curiosity was piqued. That night, other students hosted a poker game with a 0.5 BTC buy-in.

觀眾中有史蒂芬·戈德弗德（Steven Goldfeder），他現在是Offchain Labs的首席執行官，他們的好奇心被激發了。那天晚上，其他學生以0.5 BTC的支持舉辦了一款撲克遊戲。

“That was back in the days when that was just ten bucks. If only I’d held onto it…,” muses Goldfeder.

“那是在只有十美元的日子裡。

Now, as Arbitrum faces competition from faster rollups like MegaETH, which already boasts 20,000 TPS on testnet, and Coinbase's L2, Base, is quickly heating up, it seems that some of the technology underpinning Arbitrum might not be necessary after all.

現在，隨著索賠面臨來自諸如Megaeth之類的更快的匯總的競爭，該競爭已經在Testnet上擁有20,000 TPS，而Coinbase的L2（基地）正在迅速加熱，看來某些技術基礎的一些技術畢竟是不必要的。

As explained in January during a lively session on the ‘sequencing call’—a monthly meeting of major optimistic rollup teams—Arbitrum would be integrating the core technology for "based" optimistic rollups, a concept proposed by Ethereum Foundation researchers to introduce interoperability and composability among L2s.

正如一月份在一次關於“測序呼叫”（每月一次樂觀的滾動團隊的每月會議）的熱鬧會議上所解釋的，Arbitrum將整合以太坊基金會研究人員在L2之間介紹互操作性和合成性的核心技術。

However, in a recent interview with Magazine, Goldfeder expressed skepticism about Arbitrum adopting the tech.

但是，在最近接受雜誌採訪時，Goldfeder對採用該技術的仲裁表示懷疑。

“Just to clarify the terms, you know, a based rollup is basically a rollup without a sequencer that uses Ethereum for sequencing. Actually, if you look at that initial Arbitrum paper that we wrote in 2018, you might call it a based rollup. It doesn't have a sequencer; that only came later,” said Goldfeder.

“只是為了澄清術語，您知道，基本的匯總基本上是一個沒有音序的捲曲，它使用以太坊進行測序。實際上，如果您查看我們在2018年寫的那個初始的仲裁紙，您可能會稱其為基於匯總。它沒有序列的序列；它只有以後才會出現，” Goldfeder說。

“And one thing we experiment in

“我們試驗的一件事