|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
這部 100 分鐘的紀錄片探討了比特幣和其他加密貨幣項目的起源,但未能提供將 Peter Todd 與中本聰聯繫起來的具體證據。
Hours before the premiere of HBO's Satoshi Nakamoto documentary on Tuesday night, leaked clips began circulating, suggesting that Peter Todd, a former Bitcoin developer, might be the mysterious creator of the cryptocurrency. However, Todd has openly rejected this idea.
週二晚上 HBO 的中本聰紀錄片首映前幾個小時,洩露的片段開始流傳,暗示前比特幣開發商彼得托德可能是加密貨幣的神秘創造者。然而,托德公開拒絕了這個想法。
According to CoinDesk, Todd responded to the claim, accusing filmmaker Cullen Hoback—who previously uncovered the identity behind the QAnon conspiracy in an earlier HBO series—of "grasping at straws" in his attempt to link Todd to Satoshi Nakamoto.
據CoinDesk 報道,托德對這一說法做出了回應,指責電影製作人卡倫·霍巴克(Cullen Hoback)——他之前在HBO 的早期劇集中揭露了QAnon 陰謀背後的身份——“抓住了救命稻草”,試圖將托德與中本聰聯繫起來。
"Yes, that specific scene isn't a deepfake," Todd stated, confirming that the interview shown in the documentary was real, though he mentioned he hadn’t yet watched the documentary. "I did not watch the HBO doc yet, but that interview is real. Of course, I'm not Satoshi."
「是的,那個特定場景不是深度偽造的,」托德說,確認紀錄片中顯示的採訪是真實的,儘管他提到他還沒有看過這部紀錄片。 「我還沒看過 HBO 的紀錄片,但那個採訪是真實的。當然,我不是中本聰。”
Todd found it ironic that a director known for investigating QAnon was now using similar "coincidence-based" logic to fuel speculation about his involvement.
托德覺得諷刺的是,一位以調查 QAnon 聞名的導演現在卻使用類似的「基於巧合」的邏輯來加劇人們對他參與其中的猜測。
"It's funny how Cullen Hoback went from exposing QAnon to grasping at straws, using the same coincidence-based techniques to try to claim I'm Satoshi in the upcoming HBO doc," a comment from Todd reads.
托德的評論中寫道:“有趣的是,卡倫·霍巴克從揭露 QAnon 到抓住救命稻草,使用同樣基於巧合的技術試圖在即將上映的 HBO 紀錄片中聲稱我是中本聰。”
"He points out that I used British/Canadian spellings, but fails to mention that so did Satoshi, despite being American. He also points out that I replied to one of Satoshi's posts on a public forum in 2010, but conveniently leaves out the fact that anyone could do this."
「他指出我使用了英國/加拿大的拼寫,但沒有提及中本聰也是如此,儘管他是美國人。他還指出我在2010 年在公共論壇上回復了中本聰的一篇帖子,但很方便地忽略了這一事實任何人都可以做到這一點。
In clips shared on social media, notably by الإعلام الرقمي الجديد, Todd referred to the notion that he could be Satoshi as "absurd."
在社群媒體(尤其是新數位媒體)上分享的剪輯中,托德稱他可能成為中本聰的想法是「荒謬的」。
"I think it's a testament to how absurd the claim that I'm Satoshi is that even Cullen's best attempt at presenting it makes it sound ridiculous," a comment from Todd reads.
托德的評論寫道:“我認為這證明了‘我是中本聰’的說法是多麼荒謬,即使卡倫盡了最大的努力來呈現它,也讓它聽起來很荒謬。”
"He spends 100 minutes trying to convince you I'm capable of pulling off a decade-long deception, then shows me laughing about it and calling it 'absurd' to my face."
“他花了 100 分鐘試圖讓你相信我有能力完成長達十年的欺騙,然後讓我嘲笑這件事,並當面稱其為‘荒謬’。”
On Tuesday afternoon, just hours before the debut of "Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery" in New York, betting odds on Polymarket overwhelmingly favored "Other/Multiple" as the film’s reveal for Satoshi's identity. Since Todd wasn’t directly listed as a choice, anyone placing a bet on him had to select the "Other/Multiple" option.
週二下午,就在《金錢電子:比特幣之謎》在紐約首映前幾個小時,Polymarket 的投注賠率壓倒性地支持「其他/多重」作為電影揭示中本聰身份的方式。由於托德沒有直接列為選擇,任何對他下注的人都必須選擇“其他/複數”選項。
The 100-minute documentary explored the origins of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency projects but failed to provide concrete evidence linking Peter Todd to Satoshi Nakamoto.
這部 100 分鐘的紀錄片探討了比特幣和其他加密貨幣項目的起源,但未能提供將 Peter Todd 與中本聰聯繫起來的具體證據。
Some circumstantial clues were highlighted, such as Todd's early interest in cryptography, his connection to Adam Back (who communicated with Satoshi via email), his technical expertise, and the fact that both Satoshi and Todd used British/Canadian spellings, with Todd being Canadian.
一些間接線索被強調,例如托德早期對密碼學的興趣、他與Adam Back(透過電子郵件與中本聰交流)的聯繫、他的技術專長,以及中本聰和托德都使用英國/加拿大拼寫(托德是加拿大人)這一事實。
The most notable piece of evidence presented was a 2010 public forum post in which Todd replied to one of Satoshi's posts. The filmmaker, Cullen Hoback, suggested that Todd’s response was actually a continuation of Satoshi's post, mistakenly sent from Todd's account instead of Satoshi’s.
最引人注目的證據是 2010 年公共論壇的帖子,托德在其中回覆了中本聰的帖子。電影製片人卡倫霍巴克 (Cullen Hoback) 表示,托德的回覆實際上是中本聰貼文的延續,錯誤地從托德的帳戶而不是中本聰的帳戶發送。
However, the documentary did not reach a definitive conclusion that Todd was Satoshi. Even the much-anticipated confrontation between Hoback and Todd, featured in a leaked clip, remained speculative.
然而,紀錄片並沒有得出托德就是中本聰的明確結論。即使是洩露的剪輯中備受期待的霍巴克和托德之間的對抗也仍然是猜測。
"I think Cullen's film fails because he starts with the conclusion that I must be Satoshi and then tries to find evidence to support it, rather than presenting the evidence and letting the audience decide," a comment from Todd reads.
「我認為卡倫的電影失敗了,因為他一開始就得出了我一定是中本聰的結論,然後試圖找到證據來支持它,而不是提出證據並讓觀眾決定,」托德的評論寫道。
"He withholds key information and presents a distorted narrative to try to manipulate the audience into believing his conclusion."
“他隱瞞了關鍵信息並提出了扭曲的敘述,試圖操縱觀眾相信他的結論。”
Hoback also referenced a blog post where Todd claimed to be "probably the world's leading expert" on how to destroy Bitcoin, though even Hoback admitted this was far from solid evidence.
霍巴克還引用了一篇部落格文章,其中托德聲稱自己是如何銷毀比特幣的“可能是世界領先的專家”,儘管霍巴克也承認這遠非確鑿的證據。
"It felt like an admission, as if Peter wanted those close to him to believe he had indeed destroyed the bitcoins," Hoback said. "But this wasn’t proof."
霍巴克說:“這感覺就像是在承認,就好像彼得希望那些與他關係密切的人相信他確實銷毀了比特幣。” “但這不是證據。”
The Bitcoin mined by Satoshi has never been moved, fueling ongoing speculation that Satoshi either passed away or deliberately ensured they would never access the coins.
中本聰開採的比特幣從未被移動過,這引發了人們對中本聰要么去世了,要么故意確保他們永遠不會獲得這些比特幣的猜測。
免責聲明:info@kdj.com
所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!
如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。
-
- Vitalik Buterin 可能成為諾貝爾獎候選人
- 2024-10-10 04:25:15
-
- 美國大選對比特幣影響不大。這就是為什麼
- 2024-10-10 04:25:15
- 隨著美國總統大選的臨近,許多人都在猜測選舉結果將如何影響市場。然而,對於加密貨幣來說,誰獲勝可能並不重要。
-
- 比特幣賭場:線上賭博產業的遊戲規則改變者
- 2024-10-10 04:25:15
- 比特幣賭場的興起深刻改變了玩家與線上賭場互動的方式,提供了更高水準的安全性和速度