俄勒岡州起訴Coinbase出售包括XRP和ADA在內的31個未註冊的加密代幣。

總檢察長索賠Coinbase誤導用戶，並向他們出售了風險的投資。

The legal battleground expands as Oregon Attorney General (AG) Dannotified Rayfield has sued Coinbase for allegedly selling unregistered crypto tokens within the state. The lawsuit, filed on behalf of over 500,000 users without their consent, also claims the exchange misled users with risky investments, leading to financial losses.

隨著俄勒岡州總檢察長（AG）Dannotified Rayfield起訴Coinbase，據稱據稱在該州出售未註冊的加密代幣時，法律戰場擴大了。該訴訟未經同意而代表50萬用戶提起訴訟，他還聲稱交易所誤導用戶具有風險投資，導致財務損失。

Oregon's AG is pursuing a broader case than the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which had sued Coinbase for selling unregistered securities and named 18 tokens in its lawsuit.

俄勒岡州的農業正在提起比美國證券交易委員會（SEC）更廣泛的案件，該委員會起訴Coinbase以出售未註冊的證券，並在其訴訟中命名18個令牌。

In contrast, Oregon's lawsuit names at least 31 tokens that it claims were offered and sold as unregistered securities. Among them are prominent tokens such as XRP, ADA, LINK, AAVE, MKR, and UNI.

相比之下，俄勒岡州的訴訟名稱至少有31個代幣，並以未註冊的證券出售並出售。其中包括XRP，ADA，Link，Aave，MKR和Uni等著名令牌。

"Coinbase built trust with people in Oregon, which it used to offer risky investments that weren't fully checked. Because of this, people lost money, and we think Coinbase should be held responsible," said AG Rayfield.

Ag Rayfield說：“ Coinbase與俄勒岡州的人們建立了信任，它過去提供的風險投資未完全檢查。因此，人們損失了錢，我們認為Coinbase應該負責。”

"Coinbase made millions in fees by helping sell unregistered cryptocurrencies, while Oregonians lost money. This lawsuit is about holding companies accountable for breaking the law."

“ Coinbase通過幫助出售未註冊的加密貨幣，而俄勒岡人損失了金錢來賺取數百萬美元的費用。該訴訟是關於讓公司對違反法律負責。”

The lawsuit broadly claims that Coinbase flouted state securities laws by offering and selling unregistered, unacknowledged investment contracts—cryptocurrency tokens—within the state. It alleges that Coinbase's actions were willful, wanton, and in reckless disregard of the consequences.

該訴訟廣泛地聲稱，共同案件通過提供和出售未註冊的，未經認可的投資合同（Cryptocurrency代幣）來違反州證券法。它聲稱Coinbase的行為是故意的，肆意的，並且魯ck忽略了後果。

"We're suing Coinbase for selling risky investments to Oregonians without registering them or disclosing the risks, as the law requires," said AG Rayfield. "Coinbase profited massively from selling these investments, while Oregonians are left holding the bag."

Ag Rayfield說：“我們正在起訴Coinbase向俄勒岡人出售風險投資而沒有註冊或披露法律的風險。” “ Coinbase從出售這些投資中獲得了巨大的利潤，而俄勒岡人則拿著袋子。”

Out of the 31 tokens named in Oregon's lawsuit, 18 were also included in the SEC's complaint. However, Oregon's lawsuit includes additional tokens such as SOL, MATIC, UNI, and several others.

在俄勒岡州訴訟中指定的31個令牌中，SEC的投訴中還包括18個令牌。但是，俄勒岡州的訴訟包括Sol，Matic，Uni等其他幾個代幣。

Coinbase Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal responded on X, formerly Twitter, criticizing the AG's actions and stating that the lawsuit could threaten the entire crypto industry.

Coinbase首席法律官Paul Grewal對X（以前是Twitter）做出了回應，批評了AG的行動，並指出該訴訟可能威脅整個加密貨幣行業。

"Today, the Oregon AG sued to shut down Coinbase's operations in the state. He's trying to shut down an entire industry and limit peoples' financial choices. We'll fight this case and plan to continue serving Oregonians."

“今天，俄勒岡州的AG起訴關閉Coinbase在該州的業務。他試圖關閉整個行業並限制人們的財務選擇。我們將抗爭此案，併計劃繼續為俄勒岡人服務。”

He added, "The AG sued on behalf of 500k+ Coinbase users—without their consent. He's also trying to intervene in a federal case that's already decided. This case is about the AG overstepping his bounds."

他補充說：“ AG代表500K+ Coinbase用戶提起訴訟，沒有他們的同意。他還試圖干預已經決定的聯邦案件。此案是關於AG超越了他的界限。”

The lawsuit could have broader implications as it attempts to redefine specific tokens, such as XRP, within the legal framework of securities.

該訴訟可能會在證券法律框架內重新定義特定的特定令牌，例如XRP。

While the SEC case focused on classifying tokens broadly, Oregon's lawsuit specifically names and claims each token should be recognized as a security.

儘管SEC案件的重點是對代幣進行分類，但俄勒岡州的訴訟專門命名和要求每個令牌被認為是安全性。

This claim is significant as it implicates tokens like XRP, which has been a subject of contention in the ongoing legal battle with Ripple.

這一主張很重要，因為這意味著像XRP這樣的令牌，在與Ripple的持續法律鬥爭中一直是爭論的主題。

Although a federal judge ruled in favor of Ripple and ruled that XRP is not a security in that case, state AGs' actions could reopen the debate and vary the legal interpretation of these tokens.

儘管聯邦法官裁定支持Ripple，並裁定在這種情況下XRP不是安全性，但State AGS的行動可以重新開始辯論並改變對這些代幣的法律解釋。