木星的預算裂縫：加密貨幣社區的地震裂縫

Jupiter 為其工作小組 (CWG) 提出的預算引發了爭議，為四人分配了 700 萬美元，其中包括價值 675 萬美元的工資和代幣，這引起了人們的關注。社區表達了廣泛的不滿，批評該提案的補償過高、缺乏透明度以及對財務管理不善的擔憂，加劇了對中心化和與 Jupiter 去中心化原則不一致的擔憂。

Jupiter's Contentious Budget Proposal: A Seismic Rift in the Cryptosphere

木星有爭議的預算提案：加密圈中的地震裂縫

In the turbulent tapestry of the crypto universe, Jupiter, a platform that has garnered significant attention for its lofty aspirations, finds itself at a crossroads. A recent budget proposal for its first Working Group, the CWG, has ignited a firestorm of controversy, casting shadows of doubt over Jupiter's commitment to transparency and community governance.

在動盪的加密世界中，Jupiter 這個因其遠大抱負而受到廣泛關注的平台發現自己正處於十字路口。最近為其第一個工作小組（CWG）提出的預算提案引發了一場激烈的爭議，給 Jupiter 對透明度和社區治理的承諾蒙上了陰影。

A Proposal That Raises Eyebrows

一項令人驚訝的提議

At the heart of the uproar lies a proposed budget that allocates a staggering $7 million to the CWG, a group of four individuals responsible for hosting AMAs, generating ideas, and evaluating grant applicants. The compensation package, a blend of salaries and tokens, raises eyebrows with its sheer magnitude. Each member stands to receive an annual salary of approximately $85,000, supplemented by a hefty allocation of 4.5 million JUP tokens—a sum that currently translates to a staggering $6.75 million.

引起軒然大波的核心是一項擬議預算，該預算為 CWG 分配了驚人的 700 萬美元，CWG 是一個由四人組成的小組，負責主持 AMA、提出想法和評估資助申請者。薪酬方案包括工資和代幣，其規模之大令人震驚。每位成員的年薪約為 85,000 美元，另外還有 450 萬個 JUP 代幣的巨額分配——目前這一數字相當於驚人的 675 萬美元。

Compounding the community's concerns is the alarmingly short two-year vesting period for these tokens, raising questions about the CWG's long-term commitment to the platform. This generous compensation package, devoid of prior tangible contributions or a proven track record of value creation, has left the community feeling short-changed and disillusioned.

這些代幣的兩年兌現期短得驚人，這加劇了社區的擔憂，引發了人們對 CWG 對平台的長期承諾的質疑。這種慷慨的薪酬方案，缺乏先前的實際貢獻或良好的價值創造記錄，讓社區感到受到了虧待和幻滅。

Community's Reaction: A Spectrum of Discontent

社區的反應：一連串的不滿

The crypto community has responded with an outpouring of disapproval, expressing their grievances through a chorus of rejections and calls for accountability. On forums, social media platforms, and Jupiter's own channels, the proposal has been met with a resounding "no."

加密貨幣社群對此表示強烈反對，透過齊聲拒絕和呼籲問責來表達他們的不滿。在論壇、社群媒體平台和 Jupiter 自己的頻道上，該提案遭到了響亮的「不」。

The community's concerns center on the CWG's apparent lack of "skin in the game," casting doubts on their commitment to the platform's success. The perceived absence of financial incentives, coupled with the brevity of the token vesting period, has fueled accusations of self-enrichment at the expense of the broader JUP ecosystem.

社區的關注點集中在 CWG 明顯缺乏“利益相關者”，這讓人們對他們對該平台成功的承諾產生了懷疑。人們認為缺乏財務激勵，加上代幣歸屬期短暫，引發了人們對以犧牲更廣泛的 JUP 生態系統為代價來自我充實的指責。

Members of the community have stressed the importance of learning from past mistakes in the crypto landscape, urging Jupiter to remain vigilant against excessive centralization and the pursuit of personal gain. They have called for a decentralized approach that prioritizes the interests of the token holders.

社群成員強調從加密領域過去的錯誤中學習的重要性，並敦促 Jupiter 對過度中心化和追求個人利益保持警惕。他們呼籲採用去中心化的方法，優先考慮代幣持有者的利益。

CWG's Defense: A Conflicting Narrative

CWG 的辯護：矛盾的敘述

Despite the overwhelming criticism, proponents of the proposal from within the CWG have defended their position, asserting that their commitment and past contributions to the platform are sufficient evidence of their vested interest. They have emphasized the importance of their reputations and career aspirations, which they claim are intricately linked to Jupiter's success and integrity.

儘管受到鋪天蓋地的批評，CWG 內部該提案的支持者仍捍衛了自己的立場，聲稱他們的承諾和過去對該平台的貢獻足以證明他們的既得利益。他們強調了自己的聲譽和職業抱負的重要性，他們聲稱這與木星的成功和誠信有著錯綜複雜的聯繫。

However, these defenses have failed to sway the community, who remain unconvinced by the CWG's arguments. The call for greater accountability, clearer milestones, and more stringent conditions on funding has grown louder, reflecting the community's skepticism and growing dissatisfaction.

然而，這些辯護未能動搖社區，他們仍然不相信 CWG 的論點。要求加強問責制、更明確的里程碑和更嚴格的資助條件的呼聲越來越高，反映出社會的懷疑和日益增長的不滿。

A Lesson in Misalignment

錯位的教訓

As the dust settles on this divisive proposal, it is evident that Jupiter has stumbled upon a fundamental disconnect between its own ambitions and the expectations of its community. The budget proposal, while specific in numbers, has failed to resonate with the community's values and aspirations, creating a chasm of mistrust and disillusionment.

隨著這項分歧性提案塵埃落定，很明顯，Jupiter 無意中發現自己的野心與其社群的期望之間存在著根本脫節。預算提案雖然數字具體，但未能與社會的價值觀和慾望產生共鳴，造成了不信任和幻滅的鴻溝。

In an environment as dynamic and volatile as the cryptosphere, where trust is paramount and the balance of power is constantly shifting, such misalignments can have far-reaching consequences. The lessons learned from this contentious episode will undoubtedly shape the future of Jupiter and its place within the crypto ecosystem.

在像加密貨幣圈這樣充滿活力和波動的環境中，信任至關重要，權力平衡不斷變化，這種失調可能會產生深遠的後果。從這一有爭議的事件中學到的教訓無疑將塑造 Jupiter 的未來及其在加密生態系統中的地位。

Conclusion: A Defining Moment

結論：決定性時刻

Jupiter's budget proposal has served as a stark reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and community engagement in the crypto landscape. The community's swift and emphatic rejection of the proposal has sent a clear message to Jupiter and other aspiring platforms—the pursuit of excessive financial rewards without a commensurate commitment to value creation will not be tolerated.

Jupiter 的預算提案明確提醒人們透明度、問責制和社區參與在加密貨幣領域的重要性。社區迅速而堅決地拒絕了該提案，向 Jupiter 和其他有抱負的平台發出了明確的信息——追求過度的經濟回報而不對價值創造做出相應的承諾是不會被容忍的。

As Jupiter navigates this defining moment, it faces a choice—to listen to the concerns of its community, make necessary adjustments, and rebuild trust, or to ignore the backlash and risk further alienating its supporters. The outcome of this decision will not only determine Jupiter's future but also set a precedent for other crypto platforms seeking to achieve sustainable growth and community alignment.

當木星度過這個決定性時刻時，它面臨著一個選擇：傾聽社區的擔憂，做出必要的調整，重建信任，或忽視強烈反對，並冒進一步疏遠其支持者的風險。這項決定的結果不僅將決定 Jupiter 的未來，還將為其他尋求實現永續成長和社區聯盟的加密貨幣平台樹立先例。