木星的预算裂缝：加密货币社区的地震裂缝

Jupiter 为其工作组 (CWG) 提出的预算引发了争议，为四人分配了 700 万美元，其中包括价值 675 万美元的工资和代币，这引起了人们的关注。社区表达了广泛的不满，批评该提案的补偿过高、缺乏透明度以及对财务管理不善的担忧，加剧了对中心化和与 Jupiter 去中心化原则不一致的担忧。

Jupiter's Contentious Budget Proposal: A Seismic Rift in the Cryptosphere

木星有争议的预算提案：加密圈中的地震裂痕

In the turbulent tapestry of the crypto universe, Jupiter, a platform that has garnered significant attention for its lofty aspirations, finds itself at a crossroads. A recent budget proposal for its first Working Group, the CWG, has ignited a firestorm of controversy, casting shadows of doubt over Jupiter's commitment to transparency and community governance.

在动荡的加密世界中，Jupiter 这个因其远大抱负而受到广泛关注的平台发现自己正处于十字路口。最近为其第一个工作组（CWG）提出的预算提案引发了一场激烈的争议，给 Jupiter 对透明度和社区治理的承诺蒙上了阴影。

A Proposal That Raises Eyebrows

一项令人惊讶的提议

At the heart of the uproar lies a proposed budget that allocates a staggering $7 million to the CWG, a group of four individuals responsible for hosting AMAs, generating ideas, and evaluating grant applicants. The compensation package, a blend of salaries and tokens, raises eyebrows with its sheer magnitude. Each member stands to receive an annual salary of approximately $85,000, supplemented by a hefty allocation of 4.5 million JUP tokens—a sum that currently translates to a staggering $6.75 million.

引起轩然大波的核心是一项拟议预算，该预算为 CWG 分配了惊人的 700 万美元，CWG 是一个由四人组成的小组，负责主持 AMA、提出想法和评估资助申请者。薪酬方案包括工资和代币，其规模之大令人震惊。每位成员的年薪约为 85,000 美元，另外还有 450 万个 JUP 代币的巨额分配——目前这一数字相当于惊人的 675 万美元。

Compounding the community's concerns is the alarmingly short two-year vesting period for these tokens, raising questions about the CWG's long-term commitment to the platform. This generous compensation package, devoid of prior tangible contributions or a proven track record of value creation, has left the community feeling short-changed and disillusioned.

这些代币的两年兑现期短得惊人，这加剧了社区的担忧，引发了人们对 CWG 对平台的长期承诺的质疑。这种慷慨的薪酬方案，缺乏先前的实际贡献或良好的价值创造记录，让社区感到受到了亏待和幻灭。

Community's Reaction: A Spectrum of Discontent

社区的反应：一系列的不满

The crypto community has responded with an outpouring of disapproval, expressing their grievances through a chorus of rejections and calls for accountability. On forums, social media platforms, and Jupiter's own channels, the proposal has been met with a resounding "no."

加密货币社区对此表示强烈反对，通过齐声拒绝和呼吁问责来表达他们的不满。在论坛、社交媒体平台和 Jupiter 自己的渠道上，该提议遭到了响亮的“不”。

The community's concerns center on the CWG's apparent lack of "skin in the game," casting doubts on their commitment to the platform's success. The perceived absence of financial incentives, coupled with the brevity of the token vesting period, has fueled accusations of self-enrichment at the expense of the broader JUP ecosystem.

社区的关注点集中在 CWG 明显缺乏“利益相关者”，这让人们对他们对该平台成功的承诺产生了怀疑。人们认为缺乏财务激励，加上代币归属期短暂，引发了人们对以牺牲更广泛的 JUP 生态系统为代价来自我充实的指责。

Members of the community have stressed the importance of learning from past mistakes in the crypto landscape, urging Jupiter to remain vigilant against excessive centralization and the pursuit of personal gain. They have called for a decentralized approach that prioritizes the interests of the token holders.

社区成员强调从加密领域过去的错误中吸取教训的重要性，敦促 Jupiter 对过度中心化和追求个人利益保持警惕。他们呼吁采用去中心化的方法，优先考虑代币持有者的利益。

CWG's Defense: A Conflicting Narrative

CWG 的辩护：相互矛盾的叙述

Despite the overwhelming criticism, proponents of the proposal from within the CWG have defended their position, asserting that their commitment and past contributions to the platform are sufficient evidence of their vested interest. They have emphasized the importance of their reputations and career aspirations, which they claim are intricately linked to Jupiter's success and integrity.

尽管受到铺天盖地的批评，CWG 内部该提案的支持者仍捍卫了自己的立场，声称他们的承诺和过去对该平台的贡献足以证明他们的既得利益。他们强调了自己的声誉和职业抱负的重要性，他们声称这与木星的成功和诚信有着错综复杂的联系。

However, these defenses have failed to sway the community, who remain unconvinced by the CWG's arguments. The call for greater accountability, clearer milestones, and more stringent conditions on funding has grown louder, reflecting the community's skepticism and growing dissatisfaction.

然而，这些辩护未能动摇社区，他们仍然不相信 CWG 的论点。要求加强问责制、更明确的里程碑和更严格的资助条件的呼声越来越高，反映出社会的怀疑和日益增长的不满。

A Lesson in Misalignment

错位的教训

As the dust settles on this divisive proposal, it is evident that Jupiter has stumbled upon a fundamental disconnect between its own ambitions and the expectations of its community. The budget proposal, while specific in numbers, has failed to resonate with the community's values and aspirations, creating a chasm of mistrust and disillusionment.

随着这一分歧性提案尘埃落定，很明显，Jupiter 无意中发现自己的雄心与其社区的期望之间存在根本脱节。预算提案虽然数字具体，但未能与社会的价值观和愿望产生共鸣，造成了不信任和幻灭的鸿沟。

In an environment as dynamic and volatile as the cryptosphere, where trust is paramount and the balance of power is constantly shifting, such misalignments can have far-reaching consequences. The lessons learned from this contentious episode will undoubtedly shape the future of Jupiter and its place within the crypto ecosystem.

在像加密货币圈这样充满活力和波动的环境中，信任至关重要，权力平衡不断变化，这种失调可能会产生深远的后果。从这一有争议的事件中吸取的教训无疑将塑造 Jupiter 的未来及其在加密生态系统中的地位。

Conclusion: A Defining Moment

结论：决定性时刻

Jupiter's budget proposal has served as a stark reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and community engagement in the crypto landscape. The community's swift and emphatic rejection of the proposal has sent a clear message to Jupiter and other aspiring platforms—the pursuit of excessive financial rewards without a commensurate commitment to value creation will not be tolerated.

Jupiter 的预算提案明确提醒人们透明度、问责制和社区参与在加密货币领域的重要性。社区迅速而坚决地拒绝了该提案，向 Jupiter 和其他有抱负的平台发出了明确的信息——追求过度的经济回报而不对价值创造做出相应的承诺是不会被容忍的。

As Jupiter navigates this defining moment, it faces a choice—to listen to the concerns of its community, make necessary adjustments, and rebuild trust, or to ignore the backlash and risk further alienating its supporters. The outcome of this decision will not only determine Jupiter's future but also set a precedent for other crypto platforms seeking to achieve sustainable growth and community alignment.

当木星度过这个决定性时刻时，它面临着一个选择：倾听社区的担忧，做出必要的调整，重建信任，或者忽视强烈反对，并冒进一步疏远其支持者的风险。这一决定的结果不仅将决定 Jupiter 的未来，还将为其他寻求实现可持续增长和社区联盟的加密货币平台树立先例。