對於失敗的加密貨幣$ libra，哈維爾·麥利（Javier Milei

在下一個5月15日，阿根廷總統哈維爾·米利（Javier Milei）在失敗的加密貨幣$ libra的情況下被召集參加調解聽證會。

The president of Argentina, Javier Milei, was summoned for May 15 to a session of mandatory prejudicial mediation in the case of the failed cryptocurrency $. As recalled, on February 14, the president of Argentina announced through his social networks the launch of a private project to promote the growth of the country's economy, leaving thousands of victims in his wake.

阿根廷總統哈維爾·米利（Javier Milei）於5月15日被召集，以進行強制性的偏見調解，以失敗的加密貨幣$。正如召回的那樣，2月14日，阿根廷主席通過他的社交網絡宣布了一個私人項目，以促進該國經濟的增長，使成千上萬的受害者在他身邊。

According to the local newspaper Page 12, Milei and the Secretary General of the Presidency, Karina Milei, as well as the president's spokesman, Manuel Adorni, were notified on April 14 to attend the first mandatory instance of prejudicial mediation for the collective claim for damages presented by a group of 26 investors who bought the 'Token', as confirmed by the lawyer for the victims.

According to the local newspaper Page 12, Milei and the Secretary General of the Presidency, Karina Milei, as well as the president's spokesman, Manuel Adorni, were notified on April 14 to attend the first mandatory instance of prejudicial mediation for the collective claim for damages presented by a group of 26 investors who bought the 'Token', as confirmed by the lawyer for the victims.

The case of the president of Argentina and the cryptocurrency $ LIBRA

阿根廷總統和加密貨幣$ libra的案件

The case centers on the promotion and subsequent collapse in value of the cryptocurrency $. According to the complaints presented, several users invested in the enterprise motivated by the public figure of the president, which led to several victims and the case reached the courts.

該案件集中在加密貨幣$的促銷和隨後的崩潰中。根據提出的投訴，幾位用戶投資於總統公眾人物激勵的企業，這導致了幾名受害者，該案到達了法院。

The president's brother, who acts as his personal spokesman, and the secretary general of the presidency were summoned to attend the session of preliminary mandatory mediation, a legal stage prior to a possible trial, in order to try to reach an agreement or compensation for the damage caused.

總統的兄弟擔任他的個人發言人，總統秘書長被召集參加初步強制性調解會議，這是可能的審判前的法律階段，以便對造成的損害達成協議或賠償。

The case is being followed closely in Argentina, as it could have implications for the president's career. If the parties fail to reach an agreement in mediation, the case could proceed to trial, where the president could be ordered to pay damages to the investors.

該案在阿根廷緊密遵循，因為這可能會對總統的職業產生影響。如果雙方未達成調解協議，則該案可以進行審判，在那裡可以命令總統向投資者賠償賠償。

The president has been a vocal supporter of cryptocurrencies and other decentralized technologies, and he has spoken out against what he sees as the corruption and incompetence of the Argentine government. The president's involvement in the case could lead to a broader debate about the role of public figures in promoting private enterprises.

總統一直是加密貨幣和其他去中心化技術的聲音支持者，他已經反對認為阿根廷政府的腐敗和無能。總統參與此案的參與可能會導致關於公眾人物在促進私人企業中的作用的更廣泛的辯論。

The case is also being watched closely by the cryptocurrency community, which has been hit by a series of scandals in recent years. The case could lead to new regulations on the cryptocurrency industry in Argentina.

加密貨幣社區也密切關注此案，近年來，該案件受到一系列醜聞的打擊。該案可能導致有關阿根廷加密貨幣行業的新法規。

What is judicial mediation for alleged financial fraud in Argentina like?

據稱在阿根廷的財務欺詐的司法調解是什麼樣的？

It is a mandatory legal mechanism, including cases linked to possible financial fraud, in which a mediator tries to facilitate an agreement between the parties to avoid a lengthy trial.

這是一種強制性的法律機制，包括與可能的財務欺詐有關的案件，其中調解員試圖促進雙方之間的協議以避免長期審判。

In the case of Javier and Karina Milei, this instance represents the opportunity for the complainants and the defendants to present their positions and reach an economic arrangement.

就哈維爾和卡琳娜·米利（Karina Milei）而言，此案例代表了投訴人和被告有機會出示其立場並達到經濟安排的機會。

If mediation fails, the case could escalate towards a formal claim, leading to more serious legal consequences such as economic damage, reputational sanctions and even possible disqualifications if embezzlement is proven. This process aims to highlight the responsibility of public figures in promoting digital assets.

如果調解失敗，此案可能會升級正式主張，從而導致更嚴重的法律後果，例如經濟損害，聲譽制裁，甚至可能取消挪用公款。該過程旨在強調公眾人物在促進數字資產方面的責任。