詹姆森·洛普（Jameson Lopp）堅定地反對失去比特幣（BTC）的量子恢復

取而代之的是，他認為最好的行動是銷毀這些硬幣以維持比特幣協議的完整性。

Chief security officer at Bitcoin custody company Casa Jameson Lopp has recently taken a firm stance against the idea of permitting quantum recovery of lost Bitcoin (BTC). Instead, he argues that the preferable action would be to destroy these coins to maintain the integrity of the Bitcoin protocol.

比特幣監護公司Casa Jameson Lopp的首席安全官最近對允許允許量子恢復丟失比特幣（BTC）的想法採取了堅定的立場。取而代之的是，他認為最好的行動是銷毀這些硬幣以維持比特幣協議的完整性。

His position challenges emerging discussions surrounding quantum technology’s implications for cryptocurrency.

他的立場挑戰了有關量子技術對加密貨幣的影響的新興討論。

Lopp asserts that allowing quantum recovery for lost coins undermines fundamental characteristics of the Bitcoin network, specifically its censorship resistance, transaction immutability, and conservative nature. In a detailed article published on March 16, he voiced his concerns, stating:

LOPP斷言，允許丟失硬幣的量子恢復破壞比特幣網絡的基本特徵，特別是其審查的抵抗力，交易不變性和保守性。在3月16日發表的詳細文章中，他表達了自己的擔憂，並指出：

> “Allowing quantum recovery of bitcoin is tantamount to wealth redistribution. What we would be allowing is for bitcoin to be redistributed from those who are ignorant of quantum computers to those who have won the technological race to acquire quantum computers.”

>“允許比特幣的量子恢復與財富再分配有關。我們要允許的是將比特幣從那些對量子計算機一無所知的人重新分配給那些贏得了獲得量子計算機的技術競賽的人。”

He emphasizes that such a scenario poses a significant threat to the overall security of the Bitcoin network, leaving little room for optimism regarding its implications.

他強調，這種情況對比特幣網絡的整體安全構成了重大威脅，對其含義幾乎沒有樂觀的餘地。

The potential threat posed by quantum computing to cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin remains a hotly contested topic. Various opinions range from the belief that the risks associated with modern encryption are still several decades away to those who contend that practical quantum computing will never materialize. Conversely, some experts insist that the onset of this threat is imminent.

量子計算對比特幣等加密貨幣構成的潛在威脅仍然是一個激烈的主題。各種意見範圍從相信與現代加密相關的風險仍然存在數十年之遙的人到那些認為實用量子計算將永遠無法實現的人。相反，一些專家堅持認為這種威脅的開始是迫在眉睫的。

Lopp conveyed his insights on the risks associated with quantum computing at the Future of Bitcoin Conference in 2024.

LOPP傳達了他對2024年比特幣會議未來量子計算的風險的見解。

In a more recent episode of the quantum debate, researchers at Shanghai University claimed, in October 2024, to have breached encryption standards typically used in military and banking applications using a quantum computer. However, these assertions were later challenged by popular YouTuber "Mental Outlaw," who argued that the claims were exaggerated.

在量子辯論的最新一集中，上海大學的研究人員在2024年10月宣稱，違反了使用量子計算機在軍事和銀行應用中使用的加密標準。但是，這些斷言後來受到了受歡迎的YouTuber“精神違法”的挑戰，他認為這些主張被誇大了。

He noted that the quantum computer employed by the researchers managed to factor a relatively small integer, 2,269,753—a feat that set a new benchmark for quantum machines but still fell short compared to advanced classical computers.

他指出，研究人員使用的量子計算機設法考慮了一個相對較小的整數，即2,269,753，這一壯舉為量子機設定了新的基準測試，但與先進的古典計算機相比仍然缺乏。

Mental Outlaw further explained that the quantum system could only decode a 22-bit key, a stark contrast to classical computers capable of breaking more sophisticated encryption keys nearing 892 bits. Current encryption protocols typically employ key sizes between 2048 to 4096 bits, with provisions for even larger keys being possible in the future.

精神上的Outlaw進一步解釋說，量子系統只能解碼一個22位鍵，與能夠打破更複雜的加密密鑰的古典計算機形成鮮明對比，靠近892位。當前的加密協議通常在2048年至4096位之間採用鑰匙尺寸，並且將來可能會提供更大的密鑰。