Infini利用與內幕管理員權利相關的4950萬美元

這種新的違規行為引起了對加密貨幣領域安全性的其他問題。拜比特（Bybit

Stablecoin bank Infini suffered a massive security breach on Monday, just days after the attack on the Bybit exchange.

在對拜比特交易所襲擊的幾天后，斯塔布爾幣銀行英國銀行在周一遭受了巨大的安全漏洞。

This new breach has raised additional concerns about security in the crypto space.

這種新的違規行為引起了對加密貨幣領域安全性的其他問題。

Infini Exploit Drains $49.5 Million Linked to Insider Admin Rights

Infini利用與內幕管理員權利相關的4950萬美元

According to blockchain security firm Beosin Alert, the Infini contract was exploited, leading to the loss of approximately $49.5 million. Reportedly, attackers swiftly converted the stolen USDC stablecoin into 17,696 ETH before transferring the funds to an external wallet.

根據區塊鏈安全公司Beosin Alert的數據，Infini合同被利用，導致約4950萬美元的損失。據報導，攻擊者迅速將被盜的USDC Stablecoin轉換為17,696 ETH，然後將資金轉移到外部錢包中。

“It seems that the stablecoin bank Infni was hacked and 49.5M USDC was stolen. The hacker swapped 49.5M USDC for 49.5M DAI and bought 17,696 ETH. The 17,696 ETH was transferred to a new wallet,” Lookonchain corroborated.

“看來Stablecoin銀行Infni被黑客入侵，4950萬USDC被盜。這位黑客將4950萬美元的4950萬美元交換為4950萬美元，併購買了17,696 ETH。 17,696的ETH被轉移到新的錢包中。

Moreover, the attacker was originally involved in developing the contract for the Infini project. However, after delivering the project, they secretly retained admin rights. Over 100 days later, the attacker funded their address through the Tornado Cash mixing service. They sent a small ETH transaction for gas and exploited the contract, draining all funds from the platform.

此外，攻擊者最初參與了Infini項目的合同。但是，在交付項目後，他們秘密保留了管理員權利。 100天后，攻擊者通過龍捲風現金混合服務為他們的地址提供了資金。他們為汽油發送了一項小型ETH交易，並利用了合同，從平台上耗盡了所有資金。

Following the incident, Infini founder Christian Li committed to active investigations. He also articulated that user withdrawals remain unaffected, emphasizing full compensation even in the worst-case scenario.

事件發生後，Infini創始人克里斯蒂安·李（Christian Li）致力於積極調查。他還闡明了用戶戒斷仍然不受影響，即使在最壞的情況下也強調了全部薪酬。

“I said that I was always ready for the first disaster, but I didn’t expect that I would be the one to run into trouble right after bybit…I was negligent when transferring the authority before. It is ultimately my responsibility. This has sounded the alarm. There is no problem with liquidity. Full compensation can be paid and the funds are being traced,” Christian explained.

“我說我總是為第一次災難做好準備，但是我沒想到我會成為拜比特之後遇到麻煩的人……我以前轉移權威時我疏忽大意。最終是我的責任。這聽起來很警報。流動性沒有問題。可以支付全部賠償，並追溯到資金。”克里斯蒂安解釋說。

Christian also reported that the bad actor’s computer was located and reported to the police. The incident marks yet another high-profile attack in decentralized finance (DeFi). It has reignited concerns over security vulnerabilities within the sector. This follows closely on the heels of the devastating attack on Bybit, which resulted in a $1.46 billion loss.

克里斯蒂安（Christian）還報告說，壞演員的計算機已找到並報告給警方。該事件標誌著分散財務（DEFI）中的另一次備受矚目的攻擊。它重新激發了對該行業內安全漏洞的擔憂。緊隨其後的是對拜比特的毀滅性攻擊的高跟鞋，這導致了14.6億美元的損失。

Bybit Sees Over $6.7 Billion Bank Run After Friday Hack

拜比特（Bybit

While Bybit’s handling of the situation received praise, the hack triggered a panic-induced mass exodus of funds. Data on Arkham indicates outflows of over $6.7 billion.

當拜比特（Bybit）對局勢的處理受到讚譽時，該黑客引發了恐慌引起的大量資金外流。關於阿卡姆的數據表明，流出超過67億美元。

The mass movement of capital from the Bybit platform reflects growing concerns over exchange security in light of previous collapses.

從BYBIT平台進行的資本大規模流動反映了鑑於以前的崩潰，人們對交換安全性的越來越多。

Crypto developer Makickal, among others, expressed his concerns in an X (Twitter) post. He likened the situation to an economic war and drew attention to North Korea’s Lazarus Group as a key perpetrator of large-scale crypto heists.

加密開發人員Makickal等在X（Twitter）帖子中表達了他的擔憂。他將局勢比作經濟戰爭，並將注意力集中在朝鮮的拉撒路集團（Lazarus Group），這是大規模加密搶劫案的關鍵肇事者。

“Wakes up. Reads Bybit hack. Falls out of bed and starts a frantic morning of moving funds and closing positions. Terrible day. This is war, but war looks different in 2025… The battlefield has changed, from land and resources to digital wealth, but the damage is just as severe,” wrote the developer.

“醒來。閱讀Bybit Hack。從床上掉下來，開始了一個瘋狂的早晨，以搬家和關閉位置。糟糕的一天。這是戰爭，但戰爭在2025年看起來有所不同……戰場已經改變，從土地和資源到數字財富，但損害同樣嚴重。”開發商寫道。

Despite the large-scale withdrawals from Bybit, experts argue that the situation differs significantly from the collapse of FTX.

儘管從Bybit大規模撤離，但專家認為，這種情況與FTX的崩潰明顯不同。

“Big difference in how you’re handling this compared to FTX, Mt. Gox, and the likes. The reason why I put my money on Bybit. Professional team, not trying to stand out, not creating enemies, just doing business,” Crypto investor Astronomer stated.

“與FTX，Gox山等相比，您如何處理此問題的差異很大。我把錢放在bybit上的原因。 Crypto Investor天文學家說。

Similarly, AI and DeFi investor 0xJeff noted that Bybit’s rapid response demonstrated resilience. Unlike FTX, where mismanagement and internal fraud led to its downfall, Bybit’s transparency and strong financial backing have reassured some investors.

同樣，AI和DEFI投資者0xjeff指出，Bybit的快速反應表現出了韌性。與FTX不同的是，管理不善和內部欺詐導致其倒台，拜比特的透明度和強大的財務支持使一些投資者放心。

“No corporate silence, no vague PR statements—just straight accountability. – People rushed to withdraw their assets ➔ ALL withdrawals were processed, exactly as Ben promised… Many thought this was going to be FTX 2.0. Instead, it’s a masterclass in crisis management, communication, and execution,” the investor added.

“沒有公司的沉默，沒有模糊的公關聲明，只是直接責任。 - 人們急於撤回其資產➔所有提款都已處理，完全按照本的承諾……許多人認為這將是FTX 2.0。相反，這是危機管理，溝通和執行的大師班。”投資者補充說。