Infini利用与内幕管理员权利相关的4950万美元

这种新的违规行为引起了对加密货币领域安全性的其他问题。拜比特（Bybit

Stablecoin bank Infini suffered a massive security breach on Monday, just days after the attack on the Bybit exchange.

在对拜比特交易所袭击的几天后，斯塔布尔币银行英国银行在周一遭受了巨大的安全漏洞。

This new breach has raised additional concerns about security in the crypto space.

这种新的违规行为引起了对加密货币领域安全性的其他问题。

Infini Exploit Drains $49.5 Million Linked to Insider Admin Rights

Infini利用与内幕管理员权利相关的4950万美元

According to blockchain security firm Beosin Alert, the Infini contract was exploited, leading to the loss of approximately $49.5 million. Reportedly, attackers swiftly converted the stolen USDC stablecoin into 17,696 ETH before transferring the funds to an external wallet.

根据区块链安全公司Beosin Alert的数据，Infini合同被利用，导致约4950万美元的损失。据报道，攻击者迅速将被盗的USDC Stablecoin转换为17,696 ETH，然后将资金转移到外部钱包中。

“It seems that the stablecoin bank Infni was hacked and 49.5M USDC was stolen. The hacker swapped 49.5M USDC for 49.5M DAI and bought 17,696 ETH. The 17,696 ETH was transferred to a new wallet,” Lookonchain corroborated.

“看来Stablecoin银行Infni被黑客入侵，4950万USDC被盗。这位黑客将4950万美元的4950万美元交换为4950万美元，并购买了17,696 ETH。 17,696的ETH被转移到新的钱包中。

Moreover, the attacker was originally involved in developing the contract for the Infini project. However, after delivering the project, they secretly retained admin rights. Over 100 days later, the attacker funded their address through the Tornado Cash mixing service. They sent a small ETH transaction for gas and exploited the contract, draining all funds from the platform.

此外，攻击者最初参与了Infini项目的合同。但是，在交付项目后，他们秘密保留了管理员权利。 100天后，攻击者通过龙卷风现金混合服务为他们的地址提供了资金。他们为汽油发送了一项小型ETH交易，并利用了合同，从平台上耗尽了所有资金。

Following the incident, Infini founder Christian Li committed to active investigations. He also articulated that user withdrawals remain unaffected, emphasizing full compensation even in the worst-case scenario.

事件发生后，Infini创始人克里斯蒂安·李（Christian Li）致力于积极调查。他还阐明了用户戒断仍然不受影响，即使在最坏的情况下也强调了全部薪酬。

“I said that I was always ready for the first disaster, but I didn’t expect that I would be the one to run into trouble right after bybit…I was negligent when transferring the authority before. It is ultimately my responsibility. This has sounded the alarm. There is no problem with liquidity. Full compensation can be paid and the funds are being traced,” Christian explained.

“我说我总是为第一次灾难做好准备，但是我没想到我会成为拜比特之后遇到麻烦的人……我以前转移权威时我疏忽大意。最终是我的责任。这听起来很警报。流动性没有问题。可以支付全部赔偿，并追溯到资金。”克里斯蒂安解释说。

Christian also reported that the bad actor’s computer was located and reported to the police. The incident marks yet another high-profile attack in decentralized finance (DeFi). It has reignited concerns over security vulnerabilities within the sector. This follows closely on the heels of the devastating attack on Bybit, which resulted in a $1.46 billion loss.

克里斯蒂安（Christian）还报告说，坏演员的计算机已找到并报告给警方。该事件标志着分散财务（DEFI）中的另一次备受瞩目的攻击。它重新激发了对该行业内安全漏洞的担忧。紧随其后的是对拜比特的毁灭性攻击的高跟鞋，这导致了14.6亿美元的损失。

Bybit Sees Over $6.7 Billion Bank Run After Friday Hack

拜比特（Bybit

While Bybit’s handling of the situation received praise, the hack triggered a panic-induced mass exodus of funds. Data on Arkham indicates outflows of over $6.7 billion.

当拜比特（Bybit）对局势的处理受到赞誉时，该黑客引发了恐慌引起的大量资金外流。关于阿卡姆的数据表明，流出超过67亿美元。

The mass movement of capital from the Bybit platform reflects growing concerns over exchange security in light of previous collapses.

从BYBIT平台进行的资本大规模流动反映了鉴于以前的崩溃，人们对交换安全性的越来越多。

Crypto developer Makickal, among others, expressed his concerns in an X (Twitter) post. He likened the situation to an economic war and drew attention to North Korea’s Lazarus Group as a key perpetrator of large-scale crypto heists.

加密开发人员Makickal等在X（Twitter）帖子中表达了他的担忧。他将局势比作经济战争，并将注意力集中在朝鲜的拉撒路集团（Lazarus Group），这是大规模加密抢劫案的关键肇事者。

“Wakes up. Reads Bybit hack. Falls out of bed and starts a frantic morning of moving funds and closing positions. Terrible day. This is war, but war looks different in 2025… The battlefield has changed, from land and resources to digital wealth, but the damage is just as severe,” wrote the developer.

“醒来。阅读Bybit Hack。从床上掉下来，开始了一个疯狂的早晨，以搬家和关闭位置。糟糕的一天。这是战争，但战争在2025年看起来有所不同……战场已经改变，从土地和资源到数字财富，但损害同样严重。”开发商写道。

Despite the large-scale withdrawals from Bybit, experts argue that the situation differs significantly from the collapse of FTX.

尽管从Bybit大规模撤离，但专家认为，这种情况与FTX的崩溃明显不同。

“Big difference in how you’re handling this compared to FTX, Mt. Gox, and the likes. The reason why I put my money on Bybit. Professional team, not trying to stand out, not creating enemies, just doing business,” Crypto investor Astronomer stated.

“与FTX，Gox山等相比，您如何处理此问题的差异很大。我把钱放在bybit上的原因。 Crypto Investor天文学家说。

Similarly, AI and DeFi investor 0xJeff noted that Bybit’s rapid response demonstrated resilience. Unlike FTX, where mismanagement and internal fraud led to its downfall, Bybit’s transparency and strong financial backing have reassured some investors.

同样，AI和DEFI投资者0xjeff指出，Bybit的快速反应表现出了韧性。与FTX不同的是，管理不善和内部欺诈导致其倒台，拜比特的透明度和强大的财务支持使一些投资者放心。

“No corporate silence, no vague PR statements—just straight accountability. – People rushed to withdraw their assets ➔ ALL withdrawals were processed, exactly as Ben promised… Many thought this was going to be FTX 2.0. Instead, it’s a masterclass in crisis management, communication, and execution,” the investor added.

“没有公司的沉默，没有模糊的公关声明，只是直接责任。 - 人们急于撤回其资产➔所有提款都已处理，完全按照本的承诺……许多人认为这将是FTX 2.0。相反，这是危机管理，沟通和执行的大师班。”投资者补充说。