標準普爾全球“ Snubbed” Coinbase（Coin），MicroStrategy（MSTR），Robinhood（Hood）和Block（XYZ）

Vaneck Digital Assets Research Matthew Sigel負責人說，標準普爾全球“冷落”加密公司在其最新的標準普爾500指數更新中。

The head of digital assets research at VanEck is dumbfounded by a recent update from S&P Global (NYSE:SPG). In a post on X, Matthew Sigel expressed surprise that despite crypto companies seemingly meeting the criteria, they were snubbed in the latest additions to the S&P 500 index.

S＆P Global（NYSE：SPG）的最新更新使Vaneck的數字資產研究負責人震驚。在X上的一篇文章中，馬修·西格爾（Matthew Sigel）感到驚訝的是，儘管加密貨幣公司似乎符合標準，但他們還是對標準普爾500指數的最新成員卻被拒絕了。

"S&P snubbed crypto companies in their latest index additions," Sigel claimed. "The biggest names in crypto—Coinbase (NASDAQ:COIN), MicroStrategy (NASDAQ:MSTR), Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD), and Block (NYSE:XYZ)—were noticeably absent from the announcement of additions and deletions to various indices."

Sigel聲稱：“標準普爾對加密公司的最新索引增加了。” “ Crypto中的知名人士 - Coinbase（NASDAQ：COIN），MicroStrategy（Nasdaq：Mstr），Robinhood（Nasdaq：Hood）和Block（NYSE：XYZ） - 明顯缺乏向各種索引的宣布和刪除。”

Sigel further explained that while several companies hit the quantitative marks for inclusion, the S&P Dow Jones Indices (S&P DJI) committee ultimately decided against it, perhaps due to concerns about the sustainability of their business models.

Sigel進一步解釋說，儘管幾家公司達到了納入的定量標記，但S＆P Dow Jones Indices（S＆P DJI）委員會最終決定反對這一點，這可能是由於對其業務模型的可持續性的擔憂。

"The committee members expressed lots of doubt that they would remain profitable, especially the tech and financial companies. But still seems conspiratorial."

“委員會成員對他們將保持有利可圖，尤其是技術和金融公司表示懷疑。但似乎仍然是陰謀。”

S&P Global is best known for maintaining the S&P 500 through its S&P Dow Jones Indices division, which is responsible for rebalancing the index every quarter. The criteria for the index include a market cap of at least $20.5 billion, positive earnings for the last four quarters, the issuance of common shares and more.

標普全球以通過其標準普爾道瓊斯指數部門維持標準普爾500的聞名，該部門負責每個季度重新平衡該指數。該指數的標準包括至少205億美元的市值，過去四個季度的正收益，發行普通股等等。

According to Sigel, these companies met the criteria and should have been included in the updated indices. He also noted that, for example, Robinhood would remain profitable "under most any circumstance."

根據Sigel的說法，這些公司符合標準，應該包含在更新的索引中。他還指出，例如，“在大多數情況下”，Robinhood將保持盈利。