标准普尔全球“ Snubbed” Coinbase（Coin），MicroStrategy（MSTR），Robinhood（Hood）和Block（XYZ）

Vaneck Digital Assets Research Matthew Sigel负责人说，标准普尔全球“冷落”加密公司在其最新的标准普尔500指数更新中。

The head of digital assets research at VanEck is dumbfounded by a recent update from S&P Global (NYSE:SPG). In a post on X, Matthew Sigel expressed surprise that despite crypto companies seemingly meeting the criteria, they were snubbed in the latest additions to the S&P 500 index.

S＆P Global（NYSE：SPG）的最新更新使Vaneck的数字资产研究负责人震惊。在X上的一篇文章中，马修·西格尔（Matthew Sigel）感到惊讶的是，尽管加密货币公司似乎符合标准，但他们还是对标准普尔500指数的最新成员却被拒绝了。

"S&P snubbed crypto companies in their latest index additions," Sigel claimed. "The biggest names in crypto—Coinbase (NASDAQ:COIN), MicroStrategy (NASDAQ:MSTR), Robinhood (NASDAQ:HOOD), and Block (NYSE:XYZ)—were noticeably absent from the announcement of additions and deletions to various indices."

Sigel声称：“标准普尔对加密公司的最新索引增加了。” “ Crypto中的知名人士 - Coinbase（NASDAQ：COIN），MicroStrategy（Nasdaq：Mstr），Robinhood（Nasdaq：Hood）和Block（NYSE：XYZ） - 明显缺乏向各种索引的宣布和删除。”

Sigel further explained that while several companies hit the quantitative marks for inclusion, the S&P Dow Jones Indices (S&P DJI) committee ultimately decided against it, perhaps due to concerns about the sustainability of their business models.

Sigel进一步解释说，尽管几家公司达到了纳入的定量标记，但S＆P Dow Jones Indices（S＆P DJI）委员会最终决定反对这一点，这可能是由于对其业务模型的可持续性的担忧。

"The committee members expressed lots of doubt that they would remain profitable, especially the tech and financial companies. But still seems conspiratorial."

“委员会成员对他们将保持有利可图，尤其是技术和金融公司表示怀疑。但似乎仍然是阴谋。”

S&P Global is best known for maintaining the S&P 500 through its S&P Dow Jones Indices division, which is responsible for rebalancing the index every quarter. The criteria for the index include a market cap of at least $20.5 billion, positive earnings for the last four quarters, the issuance of common shares and more.

标普全球以通过其标准普尔道琼斯指数部门维持标准普尔500的闻名，该部门负责每个季度重新平衡该指数。该指数的标准包括至少205亿美元的市值，过去四个季度的正收益，发行普通股等等。

According to Sigel, these companies met the criteria and should have been included in the updated indices. He also noted that, for example, Robinhood would remain profitable "under most any circumstance."

根据Sigel的说法，这些公司符合标准，应该包含在更新的索引中。他还指出，例如，“在大多数情况下”，Robinhood将保持盈利。