Friend.tech v2 發布和空投引發不可轉讓代幣爭議

去中心化社群媒體平台 Friend.tech 將於 5 月 3 日推出第二版和空投。然而，洩漏的智慧合約揭示了潛在有爭議的功能，包括不可轉讓的代幣（$POINT），這引起了加密貨幣愛好者的擔憂。除了特定的白名單地址之外，該代幣不能出售或交換，其目的是防止初始空投銷售壓力，同時允許用戶在平台上建立社交俱樂部。

Friend.tech's Upcoming Version 2 Launch and Airdrop Sparks Controversy with Leaked Non-Transferable Token

Friend.tech 即將推出的第 2 版和空投因洩漏的不可轉讓代幣引發爭議

Decentralized social media platform Friend.tech is poised to unveil its highly anticipated version 2 (v2) and conduct an airdrop on May 3rd. However, a recent leak of its purported smart contract has raised concerns among the cryptocurrency community due to the inclusion of a controversial non-transferable token.

去中心化社群媒體平台 Friend.tech 即將推出備受期待的版本 2 (v2)，並於 5 月 3 日進行空投。然而，由於其中包含有爭議的不可轉讓代幣，最近其所謂的智能合約的洩露引起了加密貨幣社區的擔憂。

Leaked Smart Contract Details

洩漏的智能合約細節

According to a May 2nd X post by a pseudonymous decentralized finance (DeFi) researcher known as CBBOFE, the Friend.tech v2 smart contracts introduce a non-transferable token (NTT) as part of the airdrop. The researcher claims to have analyzed the smart contracts, revealing that the token will carry the ticker $POINT and will be non-transferable except to certain whitelisted protocol addresses.

根據一位名為 CBBOFE 的匿名去中心化金融 (DeFi) 研究人員 5 月 2 日發布的帖子，Friend.tech v2 智能合約引入了不可轉讓代幣 (NTT) 作為空投的一部分。研究人員聲稱已經分析了智能合約，發現該代幣將帶有 $POINT 代碼，並且除了某些列入白名單的協議地址之外不可轉讓。

Implications of Non-Transferable Tokens

不可轉讓代幣的意義

Non-transferable tokens, unlike traditional cryptocurrency tokens, cannot be freely sold or exchanged by recipients. This means that airdrop recipients will be restricted in their ability to realize the potential value of the coins, except through the specific whitelisted protocol addresses.

與傳統的加密貨幣代幣不同，不可轉讓代幣不能由接收者自由出售或交換。這意味著空投接收者實現代幣潛在價值的能力將受到限制，除非透過特定的白名單協議地址。

Criticism and Comparisons

批評與比較

The inclusion of a non-transferable token in Friend.tech's airdrop has drawn comparisons to the recent controversy surrounding EigenLayer's EIGEN airdrop. EigenLayer also opted for a non-transferable token, sparking significant backlash from the community.

Friend.tech 的空投包含不可轉讓代幣，這與最近圍繞 EigenLayer 的 EIGEN 空投引發的爭議進行了比較。 EigenLayer 也選擇了不可轉讓的代幣，引發了社區的強烈反對。

Kasper Vandeloock, a quantitative crypto trader and advisor at X10 exchange, believes that Friend.tech's non-transferable token is a strategy to force users to pay a 1.5% platform fee. He notes the irony of this move, given that Friend.tech has positioned itself as an anti-venture capital entity while potentially benefiting financially from the platform fee.

X10 交易所的量化加密貨幣交易員兼顧問 Kasper Vandeloock 認為，Friend.tech 的不可轉讓代幣是一種迫使用戶支付 1.5% 平台費用的策略。他指出這一舉動具有諷刺意味，因為 Friend.tech 將自己定位為反創投實體，同時可能從平台費用中獲得經濟利益。

Utility and Functionality of the $POINT Token

$POINT 代幣的實用性與功能

The upcoming $POINT token is expected to serve as a utility token within the Friend.tech ecosystem. It will facilitate the creation of social clubs on the platform. According to CBBOFE, the creation of these clubs may incur a 1.5% platform fee.

即將推出的 $POINT 代幣預計將作為 Friend.tech 生態系統中的實用代幣。它將促進在該平台上創建社交俱樂部。據CBBOFE稱，這些俱樂部的創建可能會產生1.5%的平台費。

Additionally, the $POINT tokens will be offered as rewards for users who stake their Ether (ETH) and Points tokens in the Friend.tech smart contract.

此外，$POINT 代幣將作為獎勵提供給在 Friend.tech 智能合約中抵押以太幣 (ETH) 和 Points 代幣的用戶。

Community Concerns

社區關注

The announcement of the non-transferable token has raised concerns among crypto enthusiasts. Pseudonymous crypto trader MK expressed a strong dislike for the "non-transferrable meta" that EigenLayer initiated.

不可轉讓代幣的宣布引起了加密貨幣愛好者的擔憂。化名加密貨幣交易員 MK 表達了對 EigenLayer 發起的「不可轉讓元」的強烈厭惡。

Potential Benefits of Non-Transferable Tokens

不可轉讓代幣的潛在好處

While non-transferable tokens have sparked criticism, they could also have some potential benefits. By restricting the initial sale of airdropped tokens, non-transferable tokens may help mitigate excessive selling pressure and support the long-term price action of the cryptocurrency.

雖然不可轉讓代幣引發了批評，但它們也可能有一些潛在的好處。透過限制空投代幣的初始銷售，不可轉讓代幣可能有助於減輕過度的拋售壓力並支持加密貨幣的長期價格走勢。

Historical Examples of Post-Airdrop Token Declines

空投後代幣下跌的歷史例子

In recent times, several airdrops have witnessed significant token declines following their distribution. The Omni Network's OMNI token lost 55% of its market capitalization within 18 hours of its airdrop in April. Similarly, Wormhole's W token experienced a 25% decline within hours of its airdrop.

最近一段時間，一些空投在分發後出現了明顯的代幣下跌。 Omni Network 的 OMNI 代幣在 4 月空投後 18 小時內就損失了 55% 的市值。同樣，Wormhole 的 W 代幣在空投後數小時內就下跌了 25%。

Airdrop Hunters and Token Manipulation

空投獵人與代幣操縱

Airdrop hunters, individuals who create multiple wallets to participate in multiple airdrops with no long-term commitment to the protocols, have been identified as a problem in the cryptocurrency space. They often sell their airdropped tokens for profit, contributing to post-airdrop price declines.

空投獵人是創建多個錢包來參與多個空投但沒有長期遵守協議的個人，已被認為是加密貨幣領域的問題。他們經常出售空投代幣以獲取利潤，從而導致空投後價格下跌。

In March 2023, airdrop hunters were reported to have consolidated $3.3 million worth of tokens from the Arbitrum (ARB) airdrop into just two wallets, highlighting their ability to manipulate the airdrop ecosystem.

據報道，2023 年 3 月，空投獵人將 Arbitrum (ARB) 空投中價值 330 萬美元的代幣合併到兩個錢包中，凸顯了他們操縱空投生態系統的能力。

Conclusion

結論

Friend.tech's upcoming version 2 launch and airdrop, while highly anticipated, has been overshadowed by the controversy surrounding its non-transferable token. The inclusion of this feature has raised concerns about user freedom and token value realization. While non-transferable tokens may have some potential benefits in mitigating selling pressure, it remains to be seen how the community will respond to this development in the long run.

Friend.tech 即將推出的第 2 版和空投雖然備受期待，但因其不可轉讓代幣的爭議而黯然失色。這項功能的加入引起了人們對用戶自由和代幣價值實現的擔憂。雖然不可轉讓代幣可能在減輕拋售壓力方面具有一些潛在的好處，但從長遠來看，社區將如何應對這一發展仍有待觀察。