美國加密貨幣法規需要更加清楚簽署和銀行關係，然後立法者優先考慮稅收改革

據行業領導人和法律專家說，在立法者優先考慮稅收改革之前，美國的加密貨幣法規需要更加清楚簽署和銀行關係。

Industry leaders and legal experts are saying that United States cryptocurrency regulations need more clarity on stablecoins and banking relationships before lawmakers prioritize tax reform.

行業領導者和法律專家說，在立法者優先考慮稅收改革之前，美國的加密貨幣法規需要更加清楚簽署和銀行關係。

“In my view, tax isn’t necessarily the priority for upgrading US crypto regulation,” Orbs general counsel Mattan Erder told Cointelegraph.

Orbs總法律顧問Mattan Erder告訴Cointelegraph：“我認為，稅收不一定是升級美國加密貨幣法規的優先事項。”

A “tailored regulatory approach” for areas including securities laws and removing “obstacles in banking” is a priority for US lawmakers with “more upside” for the industry, Erder added.

Erder補充說，針對包括證券法和消除“銀行業障礙”在內的領域的“量身定制的監管方法”是美國立法者的優先事項。

“The new Trump administration is clearly all in on crypto and is taking steps that we could have only dreamed about a few years ago (including during his first term). So it seems likely that crypto regulation will be able to have it all and get much more clear and rational regulation in all areas, including tax.”

“新的特朗普政府顯然已經在加密貨幣上，並且正在採取大約幾年前才能夢想的步驟（包括在他的第一任期）。因此，加密法規似乎可以擁有一切，並在包括稅收在內的所有領域獲得更加清晰，更合理的監管。”

However, Erder noted there are limits to what President Donald Trump can accomplish through executive orders and regulatory agency action. “At some point, the laws themselves will need to change, and for that, he will need Congress.”

但是，埃德指出，唐納德·特朗普總統可以通過執行命令和監管機構的行動可以實現什麼限制。 “在某個時候，法律本身需要改變，為此，他需要國會。”

Trump’s March 7 executive order, which directed the government to establish a national Bitcoin reserve using crypto assets seized in criminal cases, was seen as a signal of growing federal support for digital assets.

特朗普3月7日的行政命令指示政府使用在刑事案件中查獲的加密資產建立國家比特幣儲備，被視為聯邦對數字資產的支持的信號。

Despite the administration’s recent pro-crypto moves, industry experts say crypto firms may continue to face difficulties with banking access until at least January 2026.

儘管政府最近採取了親克賴特（Crypto）的行動，但行業專家表示，加密貨幣公司至少在2026年1月之前可能會繼續面臨銀行訪問的困難。

“I think it’s premature to say that de-banking is over,” as “Trump won’t have the ability to appoint a new Fed governor until January 2026,” Custdia Bank founder and CEO Caitlin Long said during Cointelegraph’s Chainreaction daily X show.

Custdia Bank的創始人兼首席執行官Caitlin Long在Cointelegraph的Chainreaeaction Daily X Show中說：“我認為說止日任已經結束為時過早。”

The crypto de-banking crisis: #CHAINREACTION

加密貨幣危機：#ChainReaction

Industry outrage over alleged de-banking practices reached a crescendo when a June 2024 lawsuit spearheaded by Coinbase resulted in the release of letters showing US banking regulators asked certain financial institutions to “pause” crypto banking activities.

當Coinbase率領的2024年6月的一項訴訟導致發布信件時，對所謂的撤銷行為的行業憤怒達到了漸進式，這表明我們的銀行監管機構要求某些金融機構“暫停”加密銀行業務活動。

Coinbase had reportedly sued the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in December 2023 over the agency’s alleged foot-dragging in approving new exchange-traded funds.

據報導，Coinbase於2023年12月起訴了美國證券交易委員會（SEC），該機構涉嫌批准新的交易所交易資金的腳步。

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong previously expressed concerns over the SEC’s stance on crypto derivatives trading. Despite the agency’s role in policing the markets, it had yet to approve any new products throughout 2024.

Coinbase首席執行官Brian Armstrong此前對SEC對加密衍生品交易的立場表示關注。儘管該機構在管理市場中的作用，但在2024年，它尚未批准任何新產品。

Earlier in March, the Trump administration unveiled plans to impose a 50% tax on capital gains realized by hedge funds and private equity firms.

3月初，特朗普政府宣布了計劃對對沖基金和私募股權公司實現的資本收益徵收50％的稅款。

The move was seen as an attempt to broaden the tax base and generate additional revenue at a time when the government is facing increasing budgetary constraints.

此舉被視為試圖擴大稅基並在政府面臨日益增加預算限制的時候產生額外收入。

The administration is also considering rolling back the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, which reduced taxes for corporations and individuals.

政府還正在考慮退縮2017年的減稅和就業法，這減少了公司和個人的稅收。

The potential rollback of the 2017 tax law has sparked debate among lawmakers and economists. Some argue that the tax cuts have benefited the wealthy at the expense of the poor and middle class.

2017年稅法的潛在回滾引發了立法者和經濟學家之間的辯論。有人認為，減稅措施使富人受益匪淺，卻以窮人和中產階級為代價。

Others contend that the tax cuts have stimulated economic growth and job creation. Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to roll back the 2017 tax law will rest with Congress.

其他人則認為減稅措施刺激了經濟增長和創造就業機會。最終，是否要退縮2017年稅法的決定將在國會中得到。