|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HBO 的中本聰紀錄片週二引起了廣泛關注。但經驗豐富的專家並不相信展會的結論。
HBO's Satoshi documentary, which aired Tuesday, got plenty of attention. But experienced hands were not convinced by the show's conclusion.
HBO 的中本聰紀錄片於週二播出,引起了廣泛關注。但經驗豐富的專家並不相信展會的結論。
The history of Satoshi-sleuthing is filled with wrong turns, cul de sacs, and wild goose chases. But HBO's "MONEY ELECTRIC: THE BITCOIN MYSTERY," which aired in the United States Tuesday night, was supposed to be different. It was supposed to provide compelling proof as to who invented Bitcoin, putting the world's greatest mystery to bed, for good.
中本聰偵查的歷史充滿了錯誤的轉折、死胡同和徒勞的追逐。但周二晚上在美國播出的 HBO 的《金錢電力:比特幣之謎》本應有所不同。它本應為誰發明了比特幣提供令人信服的證據,永遠解開世界上最大的謎團。
It didn't.
事實並非如此。
As soon as leaks emerged Tuesday afternoon that the doc would paint Peter Todd as THE GUY, everyone on X/Twitter with knowledge of the mystery was skeptical. And, on seeing the documentary itself, they were even more skeptical.
週二下午,當有消息稱這位醫生將彼得·托德描繪成那個人時,X/Twitter 上每個了解這個謎團的人都表示懷疑。而且,看到紀錄片本身後,他們更加懷疑。
Here is a smattering of tweets, reflecting the consensus.
以下是一些推文,反映了共識。
Bitcoin author Eric Yakes had it right:
比特幣作者 Eric Yakes 說得對:
Coin Center's Neeraj Agrawal:
硬幣中心的 Neeraj Agrawal:
"Faketoshi" Craig Wright, who has claimed to be Satoshi for years, also said the doc was wrong. For once, said Todd, we could agree with him:
多年來一直自稱中本聰的「Faketoshi」克雷格·賴特也表示,這位醫生是錯的。托德說,這次我們可以同意他的觀點:
@MevenRekt pointed out many inaccuracies in an otherwise well made piece of TV:
@MevenRekt 指出了一部製作精良的電視劇中的許多不準確之處:
Nic Carter had sympathy for bitcoin outsiders:
尼克卡特對比特幣局外人表示同情:
@Pledditor said the doc showed how Satoshi sleuths have been going about it the wrong way, thinking they were looking for a single well-placed person, when it really could have been many people:
@Pledditor 說,該文件展示了中本聰偵探如何以錯誤的方式進行調查,認為他們正在尋找一個合適的人,而實際上可能有很多人:
"This documentary is emblematic of why all of the Satoshi Nakamoto theories are bunk. They all hinge on the belief that only a very small amount of people in the world are capable of building bitcoin, so the theorists just pick a notable person known for their achievements and work backwards retrospectively to find a bunch of "coincidences" in their lifestyle/background to support their confirmation bias. It's a broken methodology which results in stalking and unethical doxxing. In reality, the potential amount of people with the profile and background capable of creating bitcoin in 2008 was in the tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands. The likelihood that Satoshi was any one of these semi-public figures that regularly get accused of being Satoshi is pretty slim. That's why if you don't have concrete proof, you should probably keep your Satoshi Nakamoto identity theories to yourself. All it does is put a $60 billion dollar bounty on the back of what is (most likely) the wrong person."
「這部紀錄片象徵著為什麼中本聰的所有理論都是廢話。它們都基於這樣的信念:世界上只有極少數人有能力構建比特幣,因此理論家們只是選擇了一位以其技術而聞名的名人。也有數萬。它所做的只是向(最有可能)錯誤的人提供600 億美元的賞金。
Fortune's Leo Schwartz:
《財星》雜誌的里奧‧施瓦茨:
Journalist Izabella Kaminska said we shouldn't be so quick to dismiss the doc's conclusions. After all: body language.
記者伊莎貝拉·卡明斯卡 (Izabella Kaminska) 表示,我們不應該這麼快就駁回醫生的結論。畢竟:肢體語言。
@bitstein said Satoshi is pseudonymous and always will be:
@bitstein 說中本聰是化名並且永遠是:
Todd himself had the final word:
托德本人說了算:
Note: The views expressed in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of CoinDesk, Inc. or its owners and affiliates.
註:本專欄所表達的觀點僅代表作者的觀點,不一定反映 CoinDesk, Inc. 或其所有者和關聯公司的觀點。
Disclosure
揭露
Please note that ourprivacy policy,terms of use,cookies, do not sell my personal information CoinDesk is anaward-winning editorial policies.
請注意,我們的隱私權政策、使用條款、cookie、不出售我的個人資訊是 CoinDesk 屢獲殊榮的編輯政策。
Ben Schiller is CoinDesk's managing editor for features and opinion. Previously, he was editor-in-chief at BREAKER Magazine and a staff writer at Fast Company. He holds some ETH, BTC and LINK.
Ben Schiller 是 CoinDesk 的專題和觀點總編輯。在此之前,他曾擔任《BREAKER》雜誌的主編和《Fast Company》的特約撰稿人。他持有一些 ETH、BTC 和 LINK。
免責聲明:info@kdj.com
所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!
如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。