加密AI代理商激增了，下雨後出現了許多項目，例如蘑菇

在全球AI浪潮的驅動下，Crypto AI特工飆升了，雨後有許多AI特工項目像蘑菇一樣出現。

Author: 0xJeff

作者：0xjeff

Compiled by: Felix, PANews

編譯者：菲利克斯，潘努斯

Driven by the global AI wave, crypto AI Agents have surged, with numerous AI Agent projects emerging like mushrooms after rain. How can one successfully build an Agent project? What are the common pitfalls? Crypto KOL 0xJeff summarizes the common traps in a post.

在全球AI浪潮的驅動下，Crypto AI特工飆升了，雨後有許多AI特工項目像蘑菇一樣出現。一個人如何成功構建代理項目？什麼是常見的陷阱？加密kol 0xjeff總結了帖子中的常見陷阱。

Over the past few months, I have spoken with hundreds of AI agent teams. Many teams have fallen into the same common traps. Here are the 7 major mistakes discovered during these conversations, along with suggestions on how to avoid them.

在過去的幾個月中，我與數百個AI代理團隊進行了交談。許多團隊都陷入了相同的常見陷阱。這是在這些對話中發現的7個重大錯誤，以及有關如何避免它們的建議。

1. Imitating Pioneers

1。模仿開拓者

Virtuals Protocol pioneered the narrative of AI agent tokenization. By collaborating with top teams, they continue to build innovative agents. Virtuals Protocol holds over 50% of the AI agent market share due to their excellent storytelling and narrative construction.

虛擬協議開創了AI代理令牌化的敘述。通過與頂級團隊合作，他們繼續建立創新的代理商。 Virtuals協議由於其出色的講故事和敘事構建，佔AI代理市場份額的50％以上。

Many teams believe they can replicate the success of Virtuals Protocol by tokenizing their agents, pairing them with their own tokens, and launching on a new L1/L2 (hoping to achieve PMF immediately).

許多團隊認為，他們可以通過使代理商將代理商與自己的令牌配對並在新的L1/L2上啟動（希望立即實現PMF）來複製虛擬協議的成功。

(Note: PMF refers to Product-Market Fit.)

（注意：PMF是指產品市場擬合。）

However, this approach is ineffective for two main reasons:

但是，這種方法無效，主要原因是：

The market already has too many agent tokens; simply launching another agent token is not enough.

市場已經有太多的代理令牌。僅僅啟動另一個代理令牌是不夠的。

The structure of VIRTUAL/Agent LPs is tricky, especially for early projects with low liquidity. Altcoins: The LPs of altcoins are inherently fragile, leading to higher volatility and impermanent loss. Liquidity providers (LPs) will avoid them, resulting in even lower liquidity and extreme slippage.

虛擬/代理有限元的結構很棘手，尤其是對於低流動性低的早期項目。 AltCoins：AltCoins的LPS本質上是脆弱的，導致更高的波動性和無常損失。流動性提供者（LPS）將避免它們，從而減少流動性和極端滑倒。

What to do:

該怎麼辦：

Find a unique niche market that addresses a real problem in a specific area.

找到一個獨特的利基市場，該市場解決特定領域的真正問題。

Choose LP pairs of mainstream coins or altcoins with stablecoins. They are structurally more robust, especially in volatile markets.

選擇具有穩定幣的主流硬幣或高級幣。它們在結構上更強大，尤其是在動蕩的市場中。

2. Founders/Co-founders Who Don't Understand Sales

2。不了解銷售的創始人/聯合創始人

Many teams are composed of developers who do not understand sales. As the chief salesperson, if the founder is not interested in their own product, why would they expect others to be?

許多團隊由不了解銷售的開發人員組成。作為首席銷售人員，如果創始人對自己的產品不感興趣，為什麼他們會期望其他人成為？

Conducting marketing efforts led by the founder and driven by the team (where the team actively engages in CT and continuously discusses their product) is organic marketing. People will become curious and try it out, providing feedback in return. There is no need to burn money or tokens to acquire users.

由創始人領導的營銷工作並由團隊驅動（團隊積極參與CT並不斷討論其產品）是有機營銷。人們會變得好奇並嘗試一下，從而提供反饋。無需賺錢或代幣來獲取用戶。

3. Building Products That Fit the Narrative

3.建造適合敘述的產品

Forking Compound, AAVE, OHM, or Solidly at the time was merely because it was trendy.

當時的分叉化合物，AAVE，歐姆或牢固的姿勢僅僅是因為它很流行。

Launching an AI agent was also just because it was trendy.

推出AI代理也是因為它很流行。

Building without understanding the problem to be solved or the audience to be served is one of the fastest ways to fail.

建立不了解要解決的問題，或者要服務的受眾是失敗的最快方法之一。

Before building, ask yourself:

在建造之前，問問自己：

Who are the real customers?

誰是真正的客戶？

Is the build driven by hype or by solving a real need?

構建是由炒作驅動還是通過解決真正的需求？

Are you forcing the product into a non-existent market?

您是否將產品迫使該產品進入不存在的市場？

Is your token the actual product?

您的代幣是實際產品嗎？

4. Launching Tokens Before the Product Goes Live

4。在產品上線之前啟動令牌

Launching tokens before the product goes live means the token will become the main focus. Worse, the team starts dumping tokens, competing for listings on exchanges, and neglecting product development.

在產品上線之前啟動令牌意味著令牌將成為主要重點。更糟糕的是，團隊開始傾倒代幣，爭奪交易所上市以及忽略產品開發。

This approach will never yield good results; without a product, revenue, or appeal, there is no reason for anyone to hold the token.

這種方法將永遠不會產生良好的結果；沒有產品，收入或上訴，任何人都沒有理由持有令牌。

What to do:

該怎麼辦：

Find some form of PMF before launching the token.

在啟動令牌之前，先查找某種形式的PMF。

Only issue tokens when there are clear network effects and actual value accumulation.

僅在存在明確的網絡效應和實際值積累時發出令牌。

5. Skipping the "V" in MVP

5。在MVP中跳過“ V”

MVP = Minimum Viable Product. However, many teams skip the "Viable" part and launch a useless, minimal product that no one cares about.

MVP =最低可行產品。但是，許多團隊都跳過了“可行的”部分，並推出了無人關心的無用的，最小的產品。

An MVP should be a basic but fully functional product that allows early users to try it out—this way, you can collect feedback and iterate on the product.

MVP應該是一種基本但功能齊全的產品，它允許早期用戶嘗試一下 - 這種方式，您可以收集反饋並迭代產品。

What to do:

該怎麼辦：

Engage in genuine communication with users.

與用戶進行真正的溝通。

Understand their needs and then build a product that users will actually use.

了解他們的需求，然後構建用戶實際使用的產品。

Do not cling to your assumptions before proving real value.

在證明實際價值之前，請勿堅持您的假設。

6. Lack of Clear KPIs, Goals, or Vision

6。缺乏明確的KPI，目標或願景

Some teams drift aimlessly: chasing trends, blaming the market, and reacting passively instead of executing a clear plan.

一些團隊漫無目的地漂移：追逐趨勢，責怪市場並被動地做出反應，而不是執行明確的計劃。

What to do:

該怎麼辦：

Set clear, measurable KPIs from day one.

從第一天開始設置清晰，可衡量的KPI。

Define what success looks like—what problem you are solving and what the important milestones are.

定義成功的樣子 - 您要解決的問題以及重要的里程碑是什麼。

Pivot if certain aspects are not working; no one gets it right the first time.

如果某些方面不起作用，則樞轉；沒有人第一次得到正確的事情。

7. User vs. Investor Expectations

7.用戶與投資者期望

Web3 projects have two types of products:

Web3項目有兩種類型的產品：

Tokens

令牌

Actual products

實際產品

This means attracting two types of supporters:

這意味著吸引兩種類型的支持者：

Speculators: those who speculate on tokens

投機者：在代幣上推測的人

Real users: those who care about the product

真實用戶：關心產品的人

Many projects fall into the KOL trap: paying unreliable KOLs to promote their tokens. The result is attracting a large number of Degens who do not care about the product; when prices drop or airdrops disappoint, they will panic sell and label the project a scam.

許多項目屬於KOL陷阱：支付不可靠的KOL來促進其令牌。結果是吸引了不在乎該產品的大量Degens；當價格下降或空調令人失望時，他們會驚慌失措，並將該項目標記為騙局。

What to do:

該怎麼辦：

Have a strategy

有策略