Consensys 起訴 SEC，挑戰以太坊監管為非法權力攫取

領先的以太坊軟體公司 Consensys 已在德州聯邦法院對美國證券交易委員會（SEC）提起訴訟。該訴訟指控美國證券交易委員會非法試圖監管以太坊區塊鏈及其原生代幣以太幣。 Consensys 認為，SEC 的舉動與其過去的聲明以及 CFTC 對以太坊的權威相矛盾，並將給以太坊網路帶來災難性後果。

Consensys Files Lawsuit Against SEC, Challenging ETH Regulation as Unlawful Seizure of Authority

Consensys 對 SEC 提起訴訟，挑戰 ETH 監管非法奪取權力

In a bold move that has sent shockwaves through the cryptocurrency industry, blockchain software giant Consensys has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in a Texas federal court. This lawsuit comes as a direct response to the SEC's escalating scrutiny of the Ethereum blockchain and its native token, Ether (ETH).

區塊鏈軟體巨頭Consensys在德克薩斯州聯邦法院對美國證券交易委員會（SEC）提起訴訟，此舉震撼了加密貨幣產業。這起訴訟是對 SEC 對以太坊區塊鏈及其原生代幣以太幣 (ETH) 不斷升級的審查的直接回應。

SEC's Encroachment on Ethereum

SEC 對以太坊的侵犯

The conflict arose when the SEC issued a Wells notice to Consensys, signaling its intention to bring an enforcement action against the company for allegedly violating securities laws through its MetaMask wallet product. The SEC contends that Consensys is acting as an unregistered securities broker by offering the MetaMask wallet.

當 SEC 向 Consensys 發出 Wells 通知，表明其打算對該公司因涉嫌透過其 MetaMask 錢包產品違反證券法而採取執法行動時，衝突就出現了。 SEC 認為，Consensys 透過提供 MetaMask 錢包來充當未註冊的證券經紀人。

Consensys' Counterarguments

Consensys 的反駁

Consensys vehemently denies these allegations, arguing that MetaMask is merely an interface that facilitates user interaction with the Ethereum blockchain. The company asserts that it does not hold customers' digital assets or engage in any transaction functions.

Consensys 強烈否認這些指控，認為 MetaMask 只是一個促進用戶與以太坊區塊鏈互動的介面。該公司聲稱不持有客戶的數位資產或從事任何交易功能。

Moreover, Consensys claims that the SEC's attempt to exert authority over Ethereum contradicts its previous statements, which suggested that Ether was not a security but rather a commodity. The company also points out that the CFTC has jurisdiction over derivative products tied to Ether.

此外，Consensys 聲稱 SEC 對以太坊施加權力的嘗試與其先前的聲明相矛盾，後者表明以太坊不是一種證券，而是一種商品。該公司還指出，美國商品期貨交易委員會對與以太幣相關的衍生產品擁有管轄權。

SEC's Expansive Reach and Lack of Clarity

SEC 的廣泛影響力和缺乏透明度

Consensys alleges that the SEC's actions are part of a broader pattern of overreach and a lack of clear regulatory guidance for blockchain technology. The company warns that treating Ether as a security could have disastrous consequences for the Ethereum network and the entire crypto industry.

Consensys 聲稱 SEC 的行動是更廣泛的越權模式的一部分，並且缺乏對區塊鏈技術的明確監管指導。該公司警告說，將以太幣視為一種證券可能會對以太坊網路和整個加密產業帶來災難性後果。

If the SEC were to classify Ether as a security, it would effectively halt the use of the Ethereum blockchain in the United States. Every Ether holder would face the risk of violating securities laws when transferring the token on the network.

如果美國證券交易委員會將以太坊歸類為證券，它將有效地停止以太坊區塊鏈在美國的使用。每個以太坊持有者在網路上轉移代幣時都將面臨違反證券法的風險。

Industry Concerns and SEC Enforcement Actions

產業擔憂和 SEC 執法行動

The Consensys lawsuit also highlights the SEC's recent enforcement actions against several other crypto companies, including Binance, Kraken, and Uniswap Labs. Many in the crypto industry have criticized the SEC for failing to provide clear regulations and guidance, instead opting for an aggressive enforcement approach.

Consensys 訴訟也突顯了 SEC 最近對其他幾家加密貨幣公司（包括幣安、Kraken 和 Uniswap Labs）採取的執法行動。加密產業的許多人批評 SEC 未能提供明確的法規和指導，而是選擇了積極的執法方式。

Consensys' Legal Strategy

Consensys 的法律策略

Consensys is seeking several court rulings in its lawsuit. The company requests a declaration that Ether is not a security, that MetaMask is not operating as an unlicensed broker-dealer, and that the SEC is violating the Administrative Procedure Act and the Constitution's guarantee of due process.

Consensys 正在其訴訟中尋求幾項法院裁決。該公司要求聲明以太幣不是證券，MetaMask 不是作為無證經紀交易商運營，並且 SEC 違反了《行政程序法》和憲法對正當程序的保證。

Consensys also seeks an injunction to prevent the SEC from conducting investigations based on the premise that Ethereum is a security.

Consensys 也尋求一項禁令，以阻止 SEC 以以太坊是一種證券為前提進行調查。

Implications for the Future of Cryptocurrency Regulation

對加密貨幣監管未來的影響

The outcome of the Consensys lawsuit could have significant implications for the future of cryptocurrency regulation in the United States. If Consensys prevails, it would send a strong message that the SEC's attempts to regulate decentralized technologies like Ethereum will not be tolerated.

Consensys 訴訟的結果可能對美國加密貨幣監管的未來產生重大影響。如果 Consensys 獲勝，它將發出一個強烈的訊息，即 SEC 不會容忍監管以太坊等去中心化技術的嘗試。

Conversely, a victory for the SEC would give the agency wide-ranging authority over the crypto industry and could stifle innovation and growth in the sector.

相反，美國證券交易委員會的勝利將賦予該機構對加密貨幣行業的廣泛權力，並可能抑制該行業的創新和成長。

The legal battle between Consensys and the SEC is expected to be closely watched by the crypto industry and beyond. The outcome will shape the regulatory landscape for blockchain technology in the United States and send a message to other regulatory agencies around the world.

Consensys 與 SEC 之間的法律戰預計將受到加密產業內外的密切關注。這項結果將塑造美國區塊鏈技術的監管格局，並向世界各地的其他監管機構發出訊息。