對種族主義迷因幣擴散的擔憂，引發有關審查制度和法律義務的辯論

在迷因幣的興起中，出現了一個有爭議的問題：帶有種族主義名稱的代幣激增。在最近的一次行業峰會上，小組成員討論了解決這一問題的方法，其觀點包括篩選冒犯性內容以及根據區塊鏈精神保留未經許可的訪問。雖然有些人主張加強審查制度，但有些人則強調言論自由和使用者選擇的重要性，並強調解決這個問題的複雜性。

Concerns Raised Over Proliferation of Racist Meme Coins

對種族主義模因硬幣擴散的擔憂

The recent emergence of a plethora of meme coins characterized by names that incorporate racist terms has sparked widespread concern and debate within the cryptocurrency community. These coins have become a contentious issue, prompting a panel discussion at the BUIDL Asia summit in Seoul to address the pressing question of how to effectively combat this problem.

最近出現了大量以包含種族主義術語的名稱為特徵的模因硬幣，引發了加密貨幣社區內的廣泛關注和辯論。這些硬幣已成為一個有爭議的問題，促使在首爾舉行的 BUIDL 亞洲峰會上舉行小組討論，以解決如何有效解決這一問題的緊迫問題。

Should Wallet Apps and Exchanges Censor Racist Tokens?

錢包應用程式和交易所應該審查種族主義代幣嗎？

Panelists engaged in a lively discussion, exploring various approaches to addressing the proliferation of these offensive tokens. One viewpoint, articulated by Austin Federa, head of strategy at the Solana Foundation, advocates for allowing wallet developers to implement block lists to filter out offensive content. Federa argues that this approach aligns with the principle of permissionless networks, similar to the internet's decentralized nature. He emphasizes that users retain the freedom to access such content if desired, while core networks should remain unrestricted.

小組成員進行了熱烈的討論，探討了解決這些攻擊性代幣擴散問題的各種方法。 Solana 基金會策略主管 Austin Federa 提出了一種觀點，主張允許錢包開發者實施阻止清單來過濾攻擊性內容。 Federa 認為，這種方法符合無許可網路的原則，類似於網路的去中心化性質。他強調，如果需要，使用者保留存取此類內容的自由，而核心網路應保持不受限制。

However, Marc Zeller, founder of the Aave Chan Initiative, presents an alternative perspective. Drawing upon European Union law, Zeller points out that certain jurisdictions impose legal obligations on internet service providers to filter content, citing Holocaust denialism as an example. While acknowledging that censorship resistance is a fundamental principle in the blockchain ethos, Zeller suggests that differing cultural norms and legal frameworks warrant consideration.

然而，Aave Chan Initiative 的創辦人 Marc Zeller 提出了另一種觀點。澤勒引述歐盟法律指出，某些司法管轄區對網路服務供應商施加了過濾內容的法律義務，並以否認大屠殺主義為例。雖然澤勒承認抵制審查制度是區塊鏈精神的基本原則，但他建議不同的文化規範和法律框架值得考慮。

Nodes' Obligations to Censor Racist Transactions

節點審查種族主義交易的義務

The discussion also delved into the potential legal obligations of validators and nodes to censor certain content. Federa highlights the precedent set by the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctions on Ethereum Tornado Cash transactions and North Korean crypto wallets. He notes that this move sparked significant debate within the Ethereum community, with some proposing countermeasures to penalize nodes that comply with OFAC's censorship directives.

討論也深入探討了驗證者和節點審查某些內容的潛在法律義務。 Federa 強調了美國外國資產管制辦公室 (OFAC) 對以太坊龍捲風現金交易和北韓加密錢包實施制裁的先例。他指出，此舉在以太坊社群內引發了重大爭論，有些人提出了懲罰遵守 OFAC 審查指令的節點的對策。

Relative Insignificance of Racist Meme Coins

種族主義模因硬幣的相對重要性

Despite the attention garnered by racist meme coins, Federa underscores their minimal significance in the broader cryptocurrency landscape. Comparing the phenomenon to small hate groups that garner disproportionate media coverage, he argues that their impact is negligible.

儘管種族主義迷因硬幣引起了人們的關注，但 Federa 強調它們在更廣泛的加密貨幣領域中的重要性微乎其微。與獲得過多媒體報道的小型仇恨團體相比，他認為其影響可以忽略不計。

Ongoing Debate and Search for Solutions

持續的爭論和尋找解決方案

The issue of racist meme coins remains a complex and multifaceted challenge within the cryptocurrency community. As the debate continues, stakeholders strive to find effective solutions that balance freedom of expression with the need to combat offensive and discriminatory content.

種族主義迷因硬幣的問題仍然是加密貨幣社群中一個複雜且多方面的挑戰。隨著辯論的持續，利害關係人努力尋找有效的解決方案，平衡言論自由與打擊攻擊性和歧視性內容的需求。