Coinbase Slams FDIC拒絕合作操作Chope Point 2.0調查

聯邦存款保險公司（FDIC）因涉嫌缺乏合作和透明度而受到了加密交易所巨頭Coinbase的抨擊

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) is facing heat from crypto exchange giant Coinbase over its alleged lack of cooperation and transparency in the ongoing investigation into Operation Choke Point 2.0. While regulatory agencies like the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) have taken steps to reverse prior guidance that restricted banks from engaging with cryptocurrency firms, the FDIC continues to resist transparency efforts.

聯邦存款保險公司（FDIC）正面臨著Crypto Exchange Giant Coinbase的熱量，因為其所謂的缺乏合作和透明度在對Choke Point 2.0行動的持續調查中。雖然貨幣審計長等監管機構（OCC）採取了措施撤銷事先指導，以限制銀行與加密貨幣公司互動，但FDIC仍在繼續抵制透明度的工作。

Coinbase CLO Calls Out FDIC for Transparency Refusal

Coinbase Clo要求FDIC拒絕透明度

Paul Grewal, Chief Legal Officer (CLO) at Coinbase, took to X (formerly Twitter) to criticize the FDIC for its refusal to engage in meaningful transparency concerning Operation Choke Point 2.0. According to Grewal, the regulatory agency has repeatedly stonewalled requests for information related to its role in the controversial initiative, which aimed to cut off banking access for cryptocurrency companies.

Coinbase首席法律官（CLO）的Paul Grewal帶到了X（以前為Twitter），批評FDIC拒絕對Choke Point 2.0行動進行有意義的透明度。根據格雷瓦爾（Grewal）的說法，監管機構一再對與其在有爭議的倡議中的作用有關的信息進行了沉板的要求，該倡議的目的是切斷加密貨幣公司的銀行業務訪問。

Grewal wrote:

格雷瓦爾寫道：

“They haven’t gotten the message. Despite a huge week for crypto across the rest of the federal government, on this late Friday night over at FDIC staff still continue to resist basic transparency into Operation Chokepoint 2.0.”

“他們沒有收到消息。儘管聯邦政府其他地區的加密貨幣為期一周，但在周五深夜，FDIC員工仍在繼續抵制Cokepoint 2.0行動的基本透明度。”

Coinbase has been pushing for details on how the FDIC ensured that no critical documentation regarding Operation Choke Point 2.0 was destroyed. However, Grewal revealed that the agency has consistently refused to provide this information.

Coinbase一直在推動有關FDIC如何確保沒有有關Choke Point 2.0操作的關鍵文件的細節。但是，格雷瓦爾（Grewal）透露，該機構一直拒絕提供此信息。

Furthermore, he alleged that the FDIC has been withholding crucial details about its Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) policies. The crypto exchange claims that the agency has only provided “snippets from a few documents” that appear to have no relevance to the FOIA policies or practices being questioned in a lawsuit filed by History Associates.

此外，他聲稱FDIC一直在保留有關其信息自由法（FOIA）政策的關鍵細節。加密交易所聲稱，該機構僅提供了“少數文件中的摘要”，這些摘要似乎與歷史協會提起的訴訟中質疑的FOIA政策或實踐無關。

In a direct challenge to the FDIC’s integrity, Grewal openly questioned:

在對FDIC完整性的直接挑戰中，Grewal公開質疑：

“What exactly are they hiding?”

“他們到底隱藏了什麼？”

This lack of transparency raises concerns over whether the FDIC actively participated in suppressing the crypto industry under the guise of regulatory enforcement.

缺乏透明度引起了人們對FDIC是否積極參與監管執法幌子抑制加密行業的擔憂。

Regulatory Reversals and Operation Choke Point 2.0 Developments

監管逆轉和操作障礙點2.0發展

Operation Choke Point 2.0 has long been criticized as an under-the-radar initiative aimed at defrauding crypto companies by rendering them unable to operate. The initiative gained traction during the Biden administration, but recent developments indicate a shift in the regulatory landscape under President Donald Trump’s leadership.

長期以來，Choce Point 2.0行動被批評為旨在欺騙加密貨幣公司的一項旨在欺騙加密公司的倡議。該倡議在拜登政府期間受到了關注，但最近的事態發展表明，唐納德·特朗普總統在領導層領導下的監管格局發生了變化。

Fox Business journalist Eleanor Terret highlighted the significance of recent discussions at the White House Crypto Summit, where major regulatory changes were hinted at. During the summit, President Trump referenced the rollback of dictatorial banking regulations imposed by the Biden administration, which were seen as a key enabler of Operation Choke Point 2.0.

福克斯商業新聞記者埃莉諾·特雷特（Eleanor Terret）強調了在白宮加密峰會（White Crypto Summit）最近討論的重要性，在那裡暗示了重大的監管變化。在峰會上，特朗普總統提到了拜登政府施加的獨裁銀行法規的回滾，該法規被視為Choce Point 2.0行動的關鍵推動者。

OCC’s Rollback Signals a Turning Point for Crypto Banking

OCC的回滾信號是加密銀行的轉折點

Unlike the FDIC, the OCC has begun reversing its 2020 guidance that restricted financial institutions from engaging with cryptocurrency firms and providing custodial services for digital assets.

與FDIC不同，OCC已開始逆轉其2020年的指南，該指南限制了金融機構與加密貨幣公司互動並為數字資產提供託管服務。

Terret stated:

特魯爾說：

“This rollback is a major signal the industry and banks have been waiting for.”

“這種回滾是行業和銀行一直在等待的主要信號。”

With the OCC taking a more crypto-friendly stance, financial institutions may soon be encouraged to actively participate in the digital assets space. This could open doors for increased institutional adoption, mainstream banking support for crypto businesses, and an overall shift in regulatory perception of the industry.

隨著OCC採取更加友好的立場，可能很快就會鼓勵金融機構積極參與數字資產領域。這可以為增加機構採用，對加密貨幣業務的主流銀行支持以及對行業監管看法的總體轉變打開大門。

FDIC’s Resistance: A Deliberate Move or Bureaucratic Stalemate?

FDIC的抵抗：故意的舉動還是官僚主義的僵局？

Despite broader regulatory shifts, the FDIC remains an outlier in its refusal to cooperate. Crypto industry players and advocates argue that the agency’s reluctance to engage in transparency efforts signals an attempt to cover up its involvement in the now-exposed crackdown on digital assets.

儘管有更廣泛的監管轉變，但FDIC仍然是拒絕合作的離群值。加密行業的參與者和擁護者認為，該機構不願進行透明度努力表明，試圖掩蓋其參與現在暴露的數字資產的鎮壓。

This ongoing resistance has fueled concerns over potential collusion between government agencies and banking institutions to suppress crypto-related businesses. By refusing to disclose information on FOIA requests and obstructing investigations into Operation Choke Point 2.0, the FDIC continues to draw scrutiny from both regulators and industry leaders.

這種持續的抵制引起了人們對政府機構與銀行機構之間潛在勾結的擔憂，以抑制與加密相關的企業。通過拒絕披露有關FOIA請求的信息，並妨礙了對Choke Point 2.0行動的調查，FDIC繼續對監管機構和行業領導者進行審查。

Implications for the Future of Crypto Regulation

對加密監管的未來的影響

The growing divide among U.S. financial regulators over their stance on cryptocurrency suggests an evolving landscape where policy decisions could drastically shape the future of digital assets in the country. With the OCC’s recent reversal signaling a possible path toward crypto-friendly regulations, industry players are now looking to see whether the FDIC will be pressured to follow suit.

美國金融監管機構對加密貨幣的立場的日益增長的鴻溝表明，不斷發展的景觀，政策決策可以大大影響該國數字資產的未來。隨著OCC最近的逆轉信號，這是通往加密友好法規的可能道路，行業參與者現在正在尋求查看FDIC是否會被迫效仿。

If the FDIC continues its pattern of non-cooperation, it risks further eroding trust among crypto businesses and investors. The demand for accountability in financial regulation is at an all-time high, and industry leaders, including Coinbase, are unlikely to back down from pushing for transparency.

如果FDIC繼續其不合作模式，它可能會進一步侵蝕加密業務和投資者之間的信任。對金融監管的問責制的需求是歷史最高的，包括Coinbase在內的行業領導者不太可能退出推動透明度。

As this situation unfolds, the crypto industry will closely monitor how regulatory agencies navigate this shifting landscape. Whether the FDIC relents or continues its resistance, one thing is certain: the fight for regulatory clarity in the crypto space is far from over.

隨著這種情況的發展，加密貨幣行業將密切監控監管機構如何在這種變化的情況下瀏覽。無論是FDIC放棄還是繼續其阻力，一件事都是可以肯定的：在加密空間中爭取監管清晰的鬥爭還遠遠沒有結束。