Bitget剝削：市政機器人glitger觸發了1億美元的交易狂潮，將$ voxel變成了加密風暴

在一個旋風兩個小時的狂潮中，比特犬交易員超過1億美元

In a remarkable turn of events, Bitget traders managed to pocket over $100 million in a whirlwind two-hour frenzy on April 20, 2025.

在一場顯著的事件中，Bitget交易者在2025年4月20日的旋風狂潮中設法賺了超過1億美元的旋風。

The windfall came thanks to a shocking market-maker bot malfunction that sparked an unprecedented crypto frenzy. The glitch triggered wild price swings for the obscure gaming token $VOXEL, transforming an ordinary evening into a high-stakes trading bonanza. Here’s how a tiny token became the center of a crypto storm and what it reveals about exchange vulnerabilities.

意外之所以歸功於令人震驚的市售機器人故障，引發了前所未有的加密貨幣。小故障引發了晦澀的遊戲代幣$ voxel的野生價格波動，將一個普通的夜晚變成了高風險交易的大富翁。這是一個小代幣成為加密風暴的中心及其有關交換漏洞的內容。

Minute-by-Minute: Traders Strike Gold

一分鐘：交易者罷工黃金

一分鐘：交易者罷工黃金

At 19:22 UTC, a $3 million wallet began trading $VOXEL futures, setting the stage for a chain reaction. Within minutes, prices were seen swinging 10% every 1–2 seconds, creating a playground for rapid buy-sell strategies.

在UTC 19:22，一個耗資300萬美元的錢包開始交易$ voxel期貨，為連鎖反應奠定了基礎。幾分鐘之內，每1-2秒就可以看到價格搖擺10％，從而為快速購買策略創造了一個遊樂場。

As traders piled in, the $VOXEL /USDT pair shot up 150% from $0.66 to $1.65, generating a staggering $12.7 billion in volume on Bitget by 21:22 UTC. To put that into perspective, it’s triple the Bitcoin activity on the exchange.

隨著貿易商的湧入，這對$ Voxel /USDT對從0.66美元上升到1.65美元，在21:22 UTC上產生了驚人的127億美元數量。從角度來看，這是交換上比特幣活動的三倍。

Little-known $VOXEL token went viral on X (formerly Twitter) as traders shared their outsized gains from the Bitget bot glitch. Some reportedly turned $100 into six-figure sums. “It was like catching money falling from the sky,” one trader remarked.

鮮為人知的$ voxel代幣在X（以前是Twitter）上風靡一時，因為交易者分享了他們從Bitget Bot Glitch中分享了他們的巨大收益。據報導，有些人將100美元變成了六位數的總和。一位交易員說：“這就像從天上掉下來的錢。”

Crucially, traders were cashing out their profits into stablecoins like BNB and SOL, with some encountering difficulties withdrawing large sums due to internal limits.

至關重要的是，貿易商將其利潤兌現給BNB和SOL等穩定幣，由於內部限制，有些遇到了很大的款項。

The gaming token originally had a modest $23 million market cap before the exploit, and its thin liquidity made it prone to volatility. However, nothing in the token’s fundamentals or the exchange’s statements prepared traders for the ensuing chaos.

遊戲代幣最初在漏洞利用之前有2300萬美元的市值，其較薄的流動性使其容易發生。但是，令牌的基本面或交易所的聲明中沒有任何內容為隨後的混亂提供了交易者。

Analysts called it a “perfect storm”: a low-profile asset suddenly thrust into the spotlight by a bot’s failure, rendering it the main subject of cryptocurrency news and analysis. While the token briefly spiked 150%, the whole frenzy wasn’t about $VOXEL’s value; it was about the opportunism unfolding in real-time.

分析師稱其為“完美風暴”：一個低調的資產突然因機器人的失敗而引起了人們的關注，這是加密貨幣新聞和分析的主要主題。雖然令牌短暫地飆升了150％，但整個瘋狂的價值不超過$ voxel的價值。這是關於機會主義實時展開的。

How A Glitch And Bot Sped Up 10 Years Of Crypto Memes

小故障和機器人如何加速10年的加密模因

小故障和機器人如何加速10年的加密模因

The crisis began when Bitget’s market-maker bot malfunctioned, introducing a hot mess of erratic orders on the $VOXEL /USDT futures pair.

危機始於Bitget的市政機器人的機器人出現故障，在$ Voxel /USDT期貨對上引入了一堆不穩定的訂單。

Normally, these bots help stabilize prices and liquidity in low-volume markets, but this one did the opposite, creating a predictable 10% swing on every touch. The bot’s behavior was crucial, as it enabled traders to quickly capitalize on its actions.

通常，這些機器人有助於穩定低容量市場的價格和流動性，但這相反，每次觸摸都會產生可預測的10％搖擺。機器人的行為至關重要，因為它使交易者能夠快速利用其行動。

With Bitget allowing up to 100x leverage, traders could quickly amplify their gains. Moreover, orders were being filled instantly, a red flag suggesting the bot wasn’t adjusting to real-time data and market conditions.

由於Bitget允許100倍的槓桿作用，交易者可以迅速擴大其收益。此外，訂單立即被填寫，危險信號表明該機器人沒有適應實時數據和市場狀況。

“It wasn’t trading; it was a slot machine,” crypto analyst @0xFrogify remarked, highlighting the chaotic nature of the incident.

加密分析師 @0xFrogify說：“這不是交易；這是一台老虎機。”突出了事件的混亂性。

As news of the bot glitch and traders’ windfall spread, Bitget responded by freezing accounts and reversing trades, claiming “market manipulation” by a small group of users.

隨著機器人故障和交易者的意外收穫的消息，Bitget的回應是通過凍結帳戶和逆轉交易的回應，聲稱一小群用戶“市場操縱”。

Bitget CEO Gracy Chen promised compensation to affected traders but offered few details, sparking outrage among those who saw their large profits vanish overnight.

Bitget首席執行官Gracy Chen向受影響的商人求助，但提供了很少的細節，在一夜之間看到大量利潤消失的人中引發了憤怒。

“You can’t blame us for your bot’s mistake,” trader @CryptoQingshui argued, emphasizing the exchange’s responsibility in the incident. Meanwhile, Bitget’s hot wallet address saw a surge in ETH and BTC withdrawals as trust in the exchange eroded.

Trader @CryptoQingshui認為：“您不能怪我們的機器人錯誤。”同時，Bitget的熱錢包地址看到ETH的激增和BTC撤離的湧入是對交易所的信任受到的侵蝕。

Bitget CEO’s Past Critique Of A Similar Incident Backfires

Bitget首席執行官過去對類似事件的批評

Bitget首席執行官過去對類似事件的批評

Earlier this year, Bitget had chastised rival Hyperliquid for a similar incident with the $JELLY token, which also saw rapid price increases and high trading volume.

今年早些時候，比特吉（Bitget）對與$ jelly代幣發生類似事件的競爭對手糾正了競爭對手的超級流動性，該事件也迅速上漲和交易量很高。

At the time, Chen warned that Hyperliquid’s response could lead to a repeat of FTX’s downfall, advising exchanges to take a proactive approach in such situations.

當時，陳警告說，超流動的反應可能會導致FTX倒台的重複，建議交流在這種情況下採取積極主動的方法。

Now, however, users have pointed out the hypocrisy of her statement as Bitget itself faced a similar crisis. “Look who’s talking,” tweeted blockchain researcher @DefiDetective.

但是，現在，用戶指出了她的聲明的虛偽，因為Bitget本身也面臨著類似的危機。 “看誰在說話，”佈區鏈研究員@Defidetactive上發推文。

The comparison highlights the broader vulnerabilities of centralized exchanges (CEXs) and the difficulties they face in handling rapidly changing market dynamics, especially when it comes to tokens with low liquidity.

比較強調了集中式交流（CEX）的更廣泛脆弱性以及他們在處理快速變化的市場動態方面所面臨的困難，尤其是在流動性低的代幣方面。

Earlier this year, Bitget’s CEO had warned against a similar incident with a rapidly rising token, stating that it could become "FTX 2.0.”

今年早些時候，Bitget的首席執行官警告說，迅速上升的令牌警告說，它可能成為“ FTX 2.0”。

However, when the same scenario unfolded with $VOXEL on Bitget's platform, her team has yet to respond to the comparison publicly.

但是，當Bitget平台上的$ Voxel出現相同的情況時，她的團隊尚未公開回應比較。

What We Can Learn From The $100M Heist

我們可以從1億美元的搶劫中學到什麼

我們可以從1億美元的搶劫中學到什麼