Bitcoin.com 執行長 Corbin Fraser 表示，由於以太坊不合時宜的“Wokie Energy”，“這個週期可能會跳過 ETH”

最近，以太坊飽受批評。以太坊基金會透過大量出售 ETH 來激怒社區，每次都會降低其價格。

Bitcoin.com CEO Corbin Fraser has claimed that “this cycle may skip ETH” due to Ethereum’s ill-timed “wokie energy,” prompting discussion on the role of political leanings in the crypto community.

Bitcoin.com 執行長 Corbin Fraser 聲稱，由於以太坊不合時宜的“wokie energy”，“這個週期可能會跳過 ETH”，引發了關於政治傾向在加密社區中的作用的討論。

Recently, the Ethereum Foundation has faced criticism for its large-scale ETH dumps, which have consistently driven down the price of the cryptocurrency. Many voiced criticisms towards the EF exec Aya Miyagotchi. Many voiced criticisms towards the EF exec Aya Miyagotchi. This statement raised further debate on whether Ethereum is going centralized and not community-based.

最近，以太坊基金會因其大規模的 ETH 拋售而面臨批評，這持續壓低了加密貨幣的價格。許多人對 EF 執行長 Aya Miyagotchi 提出了批評。許多人對 EF 執行長 Aya Miyagotchi 提出了批評。這項聲明引發了關於以太坊是否走向中心化而非社群化的進一步爭論。

The comments by the EF employee Josh Stark fueled people’s anger even more as his words were loosely interpreted as “in Ethetherum Foundation we use Ethereum to dump ETH.”

EF 員工 Josh Stark 的言論更加激起了人們的憤怒，因為他的話被粗略地解釋為「在以太坊基金會中，我們使用以太坊來拋棄 ETH」。

Riding the wave of people’s ramblings, Bitcoin.com CEO Corbin Fraser published an X post saying that Ethereum has a ‘wokie energy,’ which “did great during the previous cycle,” noting that Ethereum was leaning towards diversity, equity, inclusion, and eco-friendliness, and was approved by “vegetarian WEF lefties” and rallied weirdos and creatives instead of “crypto people.”

乘著人們閒聊的浪潮，Bitcoin.com 首席執行官Corbin Fraser 發表了一篇X 帖子，稱以太坊具有“wokie 能量”，“在上一個週期中表現出色”，並指出以太坊傾向於多樣性、公平性、包容性和生態友好，並得到了“世界經濟論壇素食左翼人士”的認可，並召集了怪人和創意人士而不是“加密貨幣人士”。

Ethereum has Wokie energy. It did great during the previous cycle because it checked boxes 🌈 Diversity equity inclusion 🌱 Environmentally friendly 👨‍🎨 Rallied weirdos and creatives and non crypto people.

以太坊擁有 Wokie 能量。它在上一個週期中表現出色，因為它勾選了複選框 🌈 多元化股權包容 🌱 環保 👨‍🎨 團結了怪人、創意人士和非加密人士。

The new meta is Manpower. ⚒️ Pow…

新元是人力。 ⚒️ 戰俘…

https://t.co/uO4LzyoBtP

He went on to say, “New meta is Manpower,” which is, according to Corbin, “PoW mining, DGAF aesthetics, Murcia, memes, Trump. The right. Competition.” Corbin concluded that this cycle may skip Ethereum, although he hopes to be proven wrong. At the end of the post, Corbin added a signature “Tired bag holder,” probably mocking the “milady” signature used by Vitalik Buterin earlier.

他接著說，“新元是人力”，根據 Corbin 的說法，這就是“PoW 挖礦、DGAF 美學、穆爾西亞、迷因、川普。正確的。競賽。柯賓的結論是，這個週期可能會跳過以太坊，儘管他希望被證明是錯的。在帖子的最後，Corbin 添加了一個簽名“Tired bagholder”，可能是在嘲笑 Vitalik Buterin 之前使用的“milady”簽名。

Although the tweet didn’t get much attention, it had some people discussing the politics of the crypto industry. The Bitcoin.com author David Sencil decided Corbin was cooking and dedicated a feature article to the CEO’s post, diving deep into its meaning. The title proclaims, “CEO of Bitcoin.com Puts Ethereum on Blast for ‘Woke’ Ideology.”

儘管這條推文沒有引起太多關注，但還是引起了一些人討論加密產業的政治。 Bitcoin.com 的作者 David Sencil 認為 Corbin 正在做飯，並專門為這位 CEO 的帖子撰寫了一篇專題文章，深入探討了其含義。標題宣稱，“Bitcoin.com 首席執行官將以太坊推向‘覺醒’意識形態。”

In fact, the post got around 500 views and a couple of replies. However, the exchange with several other crypto Xers followed. In his article, Sencil featured an interesting post by a crypto influencer, Beanie, who stated that politics and religion should not have a place in the crypto community and remembered how Ethereum fired Brantly Millegan from Ethereum Name Service for an old post where he expressed his “basic Catholic beliefs.”

事實上，該帖子獲得了大約 500 次瀏覽和一些回應。然而，隨後與其他幾位加密貨幣 Xers 的交流也隨之而來。 Sencil 在他的文章中介紹了加密貨幣影響者Beanie 發表的一篇有趣的帖子，他表示政治和宗教不應該在加密貨幣社區中佔有一席之地，並記得以太坊如何從以太坊名稱服務中解僱Brantly Millegan ，因為他在一篇舊帖子中表達了自己的觀點“基本的天主教信仰。”

Never forget that the Ethereum elite cancelled Brantly and got him fired from ENS.

永遠不要忘記以太坊精英取消了布蘭特利並讓他被 ENS 解僱。

Because some troll dug up an 8 year old post of his stating his basic Catholic beliefs.

因為一些巨魔挖出了他 8 年前發表的一篇帖子，闡述了他的基本天主教信仰。

Ethereum needs a radical cultural change. There’s no room for politics and religion in crypto.

以太坊需要徹底的文化變革。加密貨幣中沒有政治和宗教的空間。

Focus on tech.

專注於技術。

Beanie noted that Ethereum has a chance to “restore its glory,” under the term of abandoning politics in favor of tech.

比尼指出，以太坊有機會“恢復其輝煌”，即放棄政治而支持技術。

That’s an interesting and important take, for sure. Ironically, it reminds of the good old term “Ethereum killer,” coined to describe any new blockchain ecosystem that runs smart contracts and hosts dApps created after Ethereum. Some of these projects are killing it, but none killed Ethereum yet. Solana kind of snatched the leadership as a meme token home away, but if we judge from trading volume and market cap perspective, Ethereum is still there, still occupying the top position among projects with similar functionality, meaning that in the long-term, Ethereum proves to be the best-performing Ethereum killer on the market.

當然，這是一個有趣且重要的觀點。諷刺的是，它讓人想起了一個古老的術語“以太坊殺手”，這個術語用來描述任何運行智能合約並託管以太坊之後創建的 dApp 的新區塊鏈生態系統。其中一些項目正在殺死它，但還沒有一個項目殺死了以太坊。 Solana 有點搶走了meme 代幣的領先地位，但如果我們從交易量和市值的角度來看，以太坊仍然存在，仍然在具有類似功能的項目中佔據首位，這意味著從長遠來看，以太坊事實證明，它是市場上表現最好的以太坊殺手。

Ethereum has a lot of work to do. Ethereum taught people what scalability issues are and how long it can take to tackle them (like forever?). However, the criticisms aimed at Ethereum and its alleged left-wing or liberal vibes seem to be hit-and-miss.

以太坊還有很多工作要做。以太坊教會了人們什麼是可擴展性問題以及解決這些問題需要多長時間（例如永遠？）。然而，針對以太坊及其所謂的左翼或自由主義氛圍的批評似乎是偶然的。

Why? First off, why speak about “restore of glory” when the project in question is one of the global leaders in the sector? It is like speaking about the “crash” or even “death” of Bitcoin when it slides down by several percent and remains one of the most valuable assets in the whole damn world.

為什麼？首先，當相關項目是該行業的全球領導者之一時，為什麼要談論「恢復榮耀」？這就像談論比特幣的“崩盤”甚至“死亡”，當它下跌了幾個百分點，但仍然是整個該死的世界上最有價值的資產之一。

What’s with Ethereum’s glory? The crisis is there, no doubt. However, the project has been evolving in the conditions of constant crisis for years. It is political vibes that don’t speak to some (to many in the Trump fever era?) and distract a part of the crypto community from the solid market presence of Ethereum. David Sencil doesn’t question the cemented market position of Ethereum in his article, though.

以太坊的輝煌到底是怎麼回事？毫無疑問，危機已經存在。然而，多年來該計畫一直在持續危機的情況下不斷發展。這種政治氛圍不會對某些人（對川普熱時代的許多人？）產生影響，並且分散了部分加密貨幣社群對以太坊穩固市場存在的注意力。不過，大衛森西爾（David Sencil）在他的文章中並沒有質疑以太坊鞏固的市場地位。

Businesses develop products for their users and do not just do things in a vacuum. That’s why political leanings that may adhere to the people around the project may be a key to loyalty and not the

企業為使用者開發產品，而不僅僅是在真空中做事。這就是為什麼專案周圍的人可能堅持的政治傾向可能是忠誠度的關鍵，而不是忠誠度的關鍵。