仲裁dao提議回購1.85億美元，它在遊戲上下注

去年，運行仲裁區塊鏈的數字合作社Diotum Dao對遊戲進行了巨大關注。

Last year, Arbitrum DAO (CRYPTO: ARB) made a large bet on gaming.

去年，仲裁道（Crypto：ARB）對遊戲進行了很大的賭注。

The DAO called the project the Gaming Catalyst Program and endowed it with with 225 million ARB tokens, which was worth about $200 million at the time. But since then, the ARB token has dropped more than 60%, and the program now has about $86 million.

DAO稱該項目為遊戲催化劑計劃，並以2.25億ARB代幣賦予了該項目，當時價值約2億美元。但是從那以後，ARB代幣下降了60％以上，該計劃現在約有8600萬美元。

As frustration boils over with the burn rate and the initial promise fades, two DAO members on Monday proposed shutting down the program and clawing back most of the $86 million the cooperative had approved to invest in companies building games for Arbitrum.

隨著燃燒率和最初承諾的挫敗感，兩名DAO成員周一提議關閉該計劃，並抓住合作社批准的8600萬美元$ 8600萬美元的大部分，用於投資於建立仲裁的公司。

“We must wind down GCP activities and secure all possible funds in order to safeguard the DAO’s funds and restore investor confidence in the ability of this DAO to capital allocate capital,” said Arbitrum DAO delegates Nathan van der Heyden and GFX Labs in their clawback proposal.

“我們必須避開GCP活動並確保所有可能的資金，以維護DAO的資金，並恢復投資者對這項DAO資本分配資本能力的信心，”仲裁DAO代表Nathan van der Heyden和GFX實驗室在其扣押提案中說。

The proposal will likely split members and prompt Arbitrum’s Gaming Catalyst Program, or GCP, to make more effort to engage with the cooperative.

該提案可能會分裂成員，並促使索取索引催化劑計劃（GCP）竭盡全力與合作社互動。

“This collaboration is a direct response to your feedback and signifies our renewed focus on fostering a more transparent, engaged, and collaborative relationship with the Arbitrum DAO,” GCP contributor Rock Johanson wrote of the liaison in the cooperative’s governance forum.

GCP撰稿人洛克·約翰遜（Rock Johanson）在合作社的統治論壇上寫道：“這種合作是對您的反饋的直接回應，並表示我們重新註重與索引DAO建立更透明，參與和協作的關係。”

$185 billion industry

1850億美元的行業

The episode shows how major DeFi projects have continued to eye the $185 billion online game industry as a potential cash cow years after GameFi electrified the crypto market, and then ebbed.

這一集表明了主要的Defi項目如何繼續關注1850億美元的在線遊戲行業，因為在Gamefi電氣化加密貨幣市場的幾年後，可能會出現現金母牛，然後消滅。

Arbitrum’s GCP was controversial from the start. Some members said it was an outsized sum for an industry that has yet to produce any blockbuster hits despite receiving billions in venture capital.

仲裁的GCP從一開始就引起爭議。一些成員說，對於一個尚未獲得數十億美元風險投資的行業，這是一個尚未產生任何令人震驚的行業的巨額資金。

One delegate, GFX, attempted to scuttle the program, saying it was “an enormous amount of money for an industry vertical with no visible winners.” But the DAO backed the proposal in a vote in June.

一位代表GFX試圖破壞該計劃，稱這是“對於沒有可見贏家的行業垂直行業的巨額資金”。但是DAO在6月的投票中支持了該提議。

Billions of tokens

數十億個令牌

The delegates’ proposal shows how DAO members are growing impatient with management at the cooperatives that run many blockchain projects.

代表的提議顯示了DAO成員在運行許多區塊鏈項目的合作社中如何不耐煩。

With “decentralisation” as their goal, many blockchain developers hand over control of their product to its users. These user-led cooperatives — decentralised autonomous organisations, or DAOs, in crypto parlance — often have billions of tokens at their disposal, which they use to pay service providers and lure new projects.

以“權力下放”為目標，許多區塊鏈開發人員將對產品的控制權移交給用戶。這些以用戶為主導的合作社 - 分散的自主組織或Crypto概述的Daos-通常可以使用數十億個代幣，他們用來支付服務提供商並引誘新項目。

Some have argued that spending at DAOs is excessive and depresses the price of the token that simultaneously grants membership in the cooperatives and comprises the vast majority of their capital.

一些人認為，在道斯的支出過高，削弱了代幣的價格，這些代幣同時授予合作社的會員資格，並包括其絕大多數資本。

Turbocharged

渦輪增壓

Karel Vuong, founder of video game developer Treasure DAO, co-authored the Gaming Catalyst Program, which was designed to funnel money toward game publishers and developers over a three-year period.

視頻遊戲開發人員Dreasure Dao的創始人Karel Vuong合著了遊戲催化劑計劃，該計劃旨在在三年期間向遊戲出版商和開發人員匯款。

Online games are increasingly relying on in-game collectibles to boost profits, and some studios have explored issuing those collectibles as blockchain-based non-fungible tokens, or NFTs.

在線遊戲越來越依靠遊戲中的收藏品來提高利潤，一些工作室探索了將這些收藏品作為基於區塊鏈的無牙代幣或NFTS的發行。

In March 2024, he pitched it as a way to turbocharge game development on the largest Ethereum (CRYPTO: ETH)-based, layer 2 blockchain.

在2024年3月，他將其作為一種在最大的以太坊（Crypto：ETH）基於第2層區塊鏈的方式上進行渦輪增壓遊戲開發的方式。

“As a network, Arbitrum falls behind several major competitors across total games migrated, games launched, and total gamers,” the proposal for the Gaming Catalyst Program reads.

遊戲催化劑計劃的提議說：“作為一個網絡，仲裁落後於幾個主要競爭對手，啟動遊戲和遊戲玩家。”

“We believe that earmarking an aggressive budget to attract builders and retain talent will result in a few major wins.”

“我們認為，為吸引建築商和保留人才的積極預算指控將帶來一些重大勝利。”

Several Arbitrum delegates — members who use other people’s tokens to vote in the cooperative — have voiced concern with the size of the Gaming Catalyst Program.

幾個仲裁代表 - 使用其他人代幣在合作社中投票的成員對遊戲催化劑計劃的規模表示關注。

GFX attempted to scuttle the proposal, saying it was “an enormous amount of money for an industry vertical with no visible winners.” But the DAO backed the proposal in a vote on 12 June.

GFX試圖削減該提案，稱這是“對於沒有可見贏家的行業垂直行業來說，這是一筆巨大的錢。”但是DAO在6月12日的投票中支持了該提議。

‘Over 50 deals have been put forward to the GCP, yet fewer than 5% have reached the final stages.’

“超過50筆交易已提交給GCP，但最少的5％達到了最後階段。”

Since then, the program has lost some key members, including Treasure DAO, according to the clawback proposal from two Arbitrum delegates.

根據來自兩個仲裁代表的回扣提議，從那以後，該計劃失去了一些關鍵成員，包括寶藏道。

More recently, the program “sought to increase contributor compensation and lower its own reporting requirements,” they add. And it published its bylaws in February — an unacceptably long time, according to critics.

最近，該計劃“試圖增加貢獻者的薪酬並降低其自身的報告要求”。據評論家稱，它在二月份出版了其章程，這是一個不可接受的時間。

But GCP contributors have leaped to defend the program and argued its slow progress is proof it doesn’t intend to spend the money with abandon.

但是GCP的貢獻者已經跳躍以捍衛該計劃，並認為其緩慢的進步是證明它不打算放棄花錢。

“To date, over 50 deals have been put forward to the GCP, yet fewer than 5% have reached the final stages—demonstrating a clear commitment to due diligence,” said Arbitrum Gaming Catalyst Program council member David Bolger.

“迄今為止，已經提出了超過50筆交易，但最少的5％達到了最後階段，這表明了對盡職調查的明確承諾，”仲裁遊戲催化劑計劃委員會委員戴維·博爾格（David Bolger）說。

Structured communication

結構化溝通

“While this approach has led to some frustration within the ecosystem, it ultimately ensures that treasury funds are allocated effectively, rather than being distributed indiscriminately or carelessly.”

“儘管這種方法導致了生態系統中的某些挫敗感，但最終確保了財政資金有效地分配，而不是不加選擇或粗略地分配。”

But supporters conceded communication from the program could be better. To that end, the program on Tuesday appointed Arbitrum delegate Castle Labs to serve as its liaison to the DAO.

但是，支持者承認該計劃的溝通可能會更好。為此，該計劃在星期二任命了索引代表城堡實驗室，以作為DAO的聯絡。