非當事人意見陳述譴責 SEC 在 Coinbase 訴訟中的加密監管困境

支持 XRP 的律師兼加密貨幣倡導者 John Deaton 已提交一份非當事人意見陳述，支持 Coinbase 的動議，以證明該交易所正在向 SEC 提起的案件中的中間上訴。迪頓也嚴厲批評了 SEC 的監管方式，強調加密產業需要法律明確。他聲稱，美國證券交易委員會在加密貨幣領域的執法行動不一致，並且對產業成長有害，這凸顯了製定明確監管的必要性。

Amicus Brief Filed in Coinbase v. SEC Case Highlights Concerns over Crypto Regulation

Coinbase v. SEC 案件中提交的非當事人意見陳述凸顯了對加密貨幣監管的擔憂

New York, NY – Prominent crypto advocate and pro-XRP lawyer John Deaton has filed an amicus brief in support of Coinbase's motion to certify an interlocutory appeal in its ongoing lawsuit with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In his petition submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, Deaton vehemently criticizes the SEC's regulatory approach while stressing the urgent need for legal clarity in the cryptocurrency space.

紐約州紐約– 著名的加密貨幣倡導者和支持XRP 的律師John Deaton 提交了一份非當事人意見陳述，支持Coinbase 的動議，以證明其與美國證券交易委員會(SEC) 正在進行的訴訟中的中間上訴。迪頓在向美國紐約南區地方法院提交的請願書中，強烈批評了 SEC 的監管方式，同時強調加密貨幣領域迫切需要明確法律。

Coinbase's Motion for Interlocutory Appeal

Coinbase 的中間上訴動議

On April 12, Coinbase filed a motion seeking an interlocutory appeal in its legal battle against the SEC, which alleges violations of U.S. securities laws. The motion centers on the fundamental question of whether an investment contract can be established solely through transactions involving no post-sale obligations.

4 月 12 日，Coinbase 提出一項動議，要求在針對 SEC 的法律訴訟中尋求中間上訴，SEC 指控其違反美國證券法。該動議的核心問題是，是否可以僅透過不涉及售後義務的交易來建立投資合約。

Coinbase argues that this issue constitutes a "controlling question of law" given the divergent interpretations between the exchange and the SEC. The defendants also contend that a clear legal definition of an investment contract is crucial for the outcome of the case.

Coinbase 認為，鑑於交易所和 SEC 之間的解釋存在分歧，這個問題構成了「法律控制問題」。被告也認為，投資合約的明確法律定義對於案件的結果至關重要。

John Deaton's Amicus Brief

約翰·迪頓的非當事人意見陳述

Deaton, a staunch crypto supporter and candidate for the U.S. Senate against crypto critic Sen. Elizabeth Warren, has submitted an amicus brief supporting Coinbase's request for an interlocutory appeal. The brief represents the interests of 4,701 Coinbase customers, who Deaton believes should have a voice in the proceedings as potential parties affected by the court's ruling.

迪頓是加密貨幣的堅定支持者，也是美國參議院的候選人，反對加密貨幣批評者參議員伊麗莎白·沃倫(Elizabeth Warren)，他已提交了一份非當事人意見陳述，支持Coinbase 的中間上訴請求。該簡報代表了 4,701 名 Coinbase 客戶的利益，Deaton 認為，作為受法院裁決影響的潛在當事人，他們應該在訴訟中擁有發言權。

"It is imperative that end users of the technology have representation and are not silenced by a biased and politically motivated agency," Deaton asserts. "However, this does not imply that they desire Coinbase to serve as their spokesperson either. The SEC possesses boundless resources funded by taxpayers, and Coinbase is a multibillion-dollar corporation with access to the most exceptional legal counsel. Consumers deserve their own advocate and a voice in this matter."

迪頓斷言：“該技術的最終用戶必須擁有代表性，並且不會被有偏見和出於政治動機的機構壓制。” 「然而，這並不意味著他們希望Coinbase 充當他們的代言人。SEC 擁有由納稅人資助的無限資源，而Coinbase 是一家價值數十億美元的公司，可以聘請最出色的法律顧問。消費者應該得到自己的代言人和支持者。

Criticism of SEC Regulatory Approach

對 SEC 監管方式的批評

In his amicus brief, Deaton strongly criticizes the SEC's enforcement actions in the crypto space, emphasizing the glaring inconsistencies in the agency's approach. In particular, he challenges the SEC's argument that only tokens with an ecosystem can be classified as securities.

迪頓在他的法庭之友陳述中強烈批評了 SEC 在加密貨幣領域的執法行動，強調該機構的做法存在明顯的不一致之處。他特別挑戰了 SEC 的論點，即只有具有生態系統的代幣才能被歸類為證券。

"Bitcoin undoubtedly stands apart from other cryptocurrencies, but asserting that it is not a security because it lacks an ecosystem is simply illogical," Deaton argues.

迪頓認為：“毫無疑問，比特幣有別於其他加密貨幣，但因為缺乏生態系統而斷言它不是一種證券，這是不合邏輯的。”

Deaton reiterates the dire need for clear regulatory guidelines for the U.S. crypto industry, underscoring that the SEC's current adversarial and inconsistent stance stifles the growth of this emerging sector.

迪頓重申，美國加密貨幣產業迫切需要明確的監管指導方針，並強調美國證券交易委員會目前的敵對和不一致的立場抑制了這個新興產業的成長。

Conclusion

結論

Deaton's amicus brief highlights the ongoing battle between crypto proponents and the SEC over the regulation of digital assets. The outcome of the Coinbase v. SEC case could have significant implications for the future of the crypto industry, and the participation of end users in the proceedings ensures that their interests are represented. As the lawsuit progresses, observers will closely monitor the arguments presented by both sides and the rulings made by the courts, hoping for a resolution that fosters innovation and protects investors in the rapidly evolving digital asset landscape.

迪頓的非當事人意見陳述強調了加密貨幣支持者和美國證券交易委員會之間圍繞數位資產監管正在進行的鬥爭。 Coinbase v. SEC 案件的結果可能對加密產業的未來產生重大影響，最終用戶參與訴訟可確保他們的利益得到代表。隨著訴訟的進展，觀察家將密切關注雙方提出的論點和法院所做的裁決，希望能達成一項能夠在快速發展的數位資產領域促進創新並保護投資者的解決方案。