Market Cap: $2.6681T 0.070%
Volume(24h): $80.7998B 66.400%
  • Market Cap: $2.6681T 0.070%
  • Volume(24h): $80.7998B 66.400%
  • Fear & Greed Index:
  • Market Cap: $2.6681T 0.070%
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
Top News
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
bitcoin
bitcoin

$81574.051037 USD

-2.23%

ethereum
ethereum

$1803.338515 USD

-2.12%

tether
tether

$0.999967 USD

0.01%

xrp
xrp

$2.090263 USD

-5.03%

bnb
bnb

$601.699731 USD

-1.76%

solana
solana

$125.689093 USD

-0.60%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999984 USD

-0.01%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.165660 USD

-3.68%

cardano
cardano

$0.653985 USD

-4.23%

tron
tron

$0.232480 USD

0.49%

toncoin
toncoin

$3.887600 USD

4.52%

chainlink
chainlink

$13.337301 USD

-2.95%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.104580 USD

-5.65%

stellar
stellar

$0.264569 USD

-2.56%

avalanche
avalanche

$18.801191 USD

-5.23%

Cryptocurrency News Articles

Quantum Computing Poses a Threat to Bitcoin, but Banks Have Defenses in Place, River's Leishman Says

Feb 21, 2025 at 05:28 pm

The debate over whether quantum computers could threaten Bitcoin (BTC) is heating up once again, with River CEO Alexander Leishman arguing that Bitcoin is

Quantum Computing Poses a Threat to Bitcoin, but Banks Have Defenses in Place, River's Leishman Says

Quantum computing is a rapidly developing field that has the potential to revolutionize many aspects of our lives. However, it also poses a threat to certain technologies, such as Bitcoin and the banking system.

In a recent X post, River CEO Alexander Leishman argues that Bitcoin is at greater risk than traditional banking systems from quantum computers. This is because the security of Bitcoin funds depends entirely on the private key. Once a public key is exposed, a quantum computer could access the funds with ease.

“There is no layer of protection here for any address with a revealed public key. It is, BY FAR, the most ROI+ attack to perform if you have access to a QC no question.”

Alexander Leishman

On the other hand, the banking system is more secure. While a quantum computer could disrupt HTTPS encryption, which is used to secure online communication, attackers would still need to intercept traffic and hijack DNS before gaining access to bank systems.

Banks also use additional security layers like IP whitelists and symmetric password authentication, which are not vulnerable to quantum computers. Leishman explains:

“Even if you do manage to pop a bank you need to get that money somewhere. Everything is very KYC’d with a lot of manual controls around large movements of funds. Good luck moving millions or billions without a human catching something.”

Alexander Leishman

Overall, Leishman believes that Bitcoin is more at risk from quantum computers than the banking system. However, he notes that this is not something to worry about in the near future.

Recent developments suggest that quantum computing may be closer than previously thought. On Feb. 19, Microsoft introduced a new quantum chip, claiming it demonstrates quantum computing is “years, not decades” away. The so-called Majorana 1 chip is designed to reduce quantum computing’s error-prone nature and is supported by a scientific paper slated for publication in Nature.

While there's still some doubt in the tech world about how soon quantum computing will have an impact, companies like Google and IBM are predicting that large-scale quantum computers could be up and running by 2033.

Disclaimer:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

Other articles published on Apr 01, 2025