Market Cap: $2.6404T -2.060%
Volume(24h): $73.8114B -6.850%
  • Market Cap: $2.6404T -2.060%
  • Volume(24h): $73.8114B -6.850%
  • Fear & Greed Index:
  • Market Cap: $2.6404T -2.060%
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
Top News
Cryptos
Topics
Cryptospedia
News
CryptosTopics
Videos
bitcoin
bitcoin

$83881.305914 USD

-1.51%

ethereum
ethereum

$1599.493906 USD

-1.98%

tether
tether

$0.999870 USD

0.00%

xrp
xrp

$2.087952 USD

-2.49%

bnb
bnb

$583.626267 USD

-0.36%

solana
solana

$127.076143 USD

-1.96%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999920 USD

-0.02%

tron
tron

$0.252625 USD

-0.28%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.155702 USD

-2.39%

cardano
cardano

$0.615625 USD

-3.57%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.364556 USD

-0.72%

chainlink
chainlink

$12.361583 USD

-2.23%

avalanche
avalanche

$19.005301 USD

-4.93%

stellar
stellar

$0.237107 USD

-1.81%

toncoin
toncoin

$2.902991 USD

-0.02%

Cryptocurrency News Articles

ETH Burn vs Staking: How Ethereum's Economic Model Is Struggling to Find Balance

Apr 14, 2025 at 07:35 pm

A total of 4.5 million Ethereum tokens worth $15.3 billion were destroyed through Ethereum Improvement Proposal (EIP) 1559 implemented during August 2021.

ETH Burn vs Staking: How Ethereum's Economic Model Is Struggling to Find Balance

A total of 4.5 million Ethereum (CRYPTO: ETH) tokens were burned through Ethereum Improvement Proposal (EIP) 1559 in August 2021. The eventual objective was to make Ethereum a "deflationary token" by decreasing the total number of tokens.

However, the supply of Ethereum (CRYPTO: ETH) continues to grow despite an “Ethereum deflation dilemma” which occurred due to the business.

ETH Burn Vs Staking: How Ethereum’s Economic Model Is Struggling to Find Balance

With EIP-1559 a part of transaction fees are burnt as burn payments which helps in reducing the ETH supply. The designers of Ethereum wanted the burn mechanism to cancel out its existing inflationary feature while promoting scarcity of ETH which potentially enhances its market price over time.But the ongoing ETH burn vs staking issue highlights the challenges that Ethereum faces in balancing its token supply with increasing staking rewards.

The system worked exactly as the designers had planned when there were a large number of transactions. After the initial implementation of this approach decreased Ethereum’s supply increase to a point where some individuals began believing the system was deflationary. But the real scenario turned out to be drastically different from the original setup.

Ethereum Deflation Problem: Can EIP-1559 and Staking Rewards Coexist?

Proof-of-Stake replaced proof-of-work as Ethereum’s consensus algorithm when the platform transitioned in September 2022. The network transition to proof-of-stake decreased energy consumption significantly but it led to an increased issuance of new ETH because validators received ETH rewards through staking. The ongoing expansion of Ethereum’s supply is due to a steady growth despite the operation of its burning mechanism.The Ethereum deflation problem is getting worse as staking rewards continue to outpace the burning mechanism, which raises concerns about the long-term value.

A Deeper Look into Ethereum’s Inflationary Trend

The Ethereum network went into an inflationary state for the first time after EIP-1559 implementation during Q2 2024. The staking rewards distributed 228,543 ETH to validators but they destroyed only 107,725 ETH in this period. The number of ETH in circulation increased by about 120,818 from the shifts in supply and demand at that time. This shift happened mainly because the staking reward issuance rates exceeded the total amount burned.

Ethereum continues to increase its supply as the program issues rewards for staking even though it has successfully destroyed millions of ETH tokens. To maintain its deflationary structure, Ethereum needs adjustments because rewards from staking exceed burning activities which creates an imbalance in the economic model. Future protocol enhancements or modifications to the staking rewards might be required to achieve this desired economic model.

How the Ethereum Deflation Dilemma Could Impact Ethereum Price in the Long RunThe price of Ethereum remains highly sensitive to these deflationary and inflationary dynamics, and the market trends reflect the uncertainty surrounding the network’s future.Recent momentum changes from the Relative Strength Index (RSI) indicator corresponded with key price movements at the $1,630 mark. Price momentum became bullish whenever the currency plunged into over sold levels and these events supported the bullish crossover of the MACD signs (Golden Crosses) throughout upward price action. Despite the RSI showing a decreased overbought reading, we can still see that the preferred momentum is bullish due to the recent MACD crossover. Ethereum shows a strong resilience to bear trends but a strong breakout of the $1,630 threshold would lower the risk to either the $1,600 or $1,585 levels.

Disclaimer:info@kdj.com

The information provided is not trading advice. kdj.com does not assume any responsibility for any investments made based on the information provided in this article. Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and it is highly recommended that you invest with caution after thorough research!

If you believe that the content used on this website infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately (info@kdj.com) and we will delete it promptly.

Other articles published on Apr 16, 2025