Ripple 首席技术官 David Schwartz 质疑比特币的身份和治理范式

Ripple 首席技术官 David Schwartz 挑战了传统观念，即比特币的名称和所有权属于拥有多数算力的一方。他认为，理性用户优先考虑网络的性质和价值而不是其名称，而哈希算力控制的概念引入了可能与他们的期望或需求不符的治理模型。施瓦茨的批评引发了关于加密货币治理以及矿工和用户之间权力平衡的更广泛讨论，凸显了去中心化数字货币管理的复杂性和不断演变。

David Schwartz, Ripple's Chief Technology Officer, Challenges Bitcoin's Naming and Governance Paradigms

Ripple 首席技术官 David Schwartz 挑战比特币的命名和治理范式

San Francisco, California - April 22, 2024 - Ripple's David Schwartz has ignited a fervent debate within the cryptocurrency community by questioning the long-held belief that the name and identity of Bitcoin solely reside with the network's dominant hash power holders. In a series of incisive tweets and social media posts, Schwartz argues that this simplistic notion overlooks the complexities inherent in the governance of decentralized digital currencies like Bitcoin.

加利福尼亚州旧金山 - 2024 年 4 月 22 日 - Ripple 的 David Schwartz 对长期以来认为比特币的名称和身份仅属于网络主要算力持有者的观点提出了质疑，从而在加密货币社区内引发了一场激烈的辩论。在一系列尖锐的推文和社交媒体帖子中，施瓦茨认为这种简单化的概念忽视了比特币等去中心化数字货币治理固有的复杂性。

Hash Power vs. Network Identity

算力与网络身份

Schwartz's critique stems from the premise that the legitimacy of a cryptocurrency's name and governing authority should not be determined solely by the whims of those wielding the majority of hash power. He emphasizes that rational users prioritize the intrinsic qualities of a network over arbitrary nomenclature.

施瓦茨的批评源于这样一个前提：加密货币名称和管理机构的合法性不应仅由掌握大多数算力的人的一时兴起来决定。他强调，理性用户优先考虑网络的内在品质，而不是任意命名。

"Do you think a rational user says 'I want whatever is called bitcoin, whether it's good or bad, honest or corrupt?'" Schwartz tweeted. "The former is how you tell what is 'bitcoin'. The latter is how you get what you actually want."

“你认为理性的用户会说‘我想要任何所谓的比特币，无论它是好还是坏、诚实还是腐败？’”施瓦茨在推特上写道。 “前者是你如何分辨什么是‘比特币’。后者是你如何获得你真正想要的东西。”

Bitcoin's Identity Crisis

比特币的身份危机

Schwartz's argument resonates with the ongoing identity crisis within the Bitcoin community. The contentious blockchain split that gave birth to Bitcoin Cash (BCH) exemplifies the challenges of determining the legitimate heir to the Bitcoin name. Ultimately, each user's choice of allegiance stems not from a mere preference for a particular label but rather from the principles and values that guide the underlying network.

施瓦茨的观点与比特币社区中持续存在的身份危机产生了共鸣。有争议的区块链分裂催生了比特币现金（BCH），这体现了确定比特币名称合法继承人所面临的挑战。最终，每个用户对忠诚的选择不仅仅源于对特定标签的偏好，而是源于指导底层网络的原则和价值观。

The Role of Full Nodes and Hash Power

全节点和算力的作用

At the heart of Bitcoin's decentralized architecture lies the intricate relationship between full nodes and hash power. Full nodes, the backbone of the peer-to-peer network, meticulously validate transactions and maintain a complete copy of the blockchain. This ensures the integrity and resilience of the system.

比特币去中心化架构的核心在于全节点和算力之间错综复杂的关系。全节点是点对点网络的支柱，精心验证交易并维护区块链的完整副本。这确保了系统的完整性和弹性。

Hash power, on the other hand, is the computational firepower employed by miners to process transactions and secure the network. While hash power plays a crucial role, Schwartz contends that it should not be the sole arbiter of Bitcoin's identity and governance.

另一方面，哈希能力是矿工用来处理交易和保护网络的计算能力。虽然算力发挥着至关重要的作用，但施瓦茨认为，它不应该成为比特币身份和治理的唯一仲裁者。

Schwartz's Call for Rational Choice

施瓦茨呼吁理性选择

Schwartz advocates for a more rational approach to cryptocurrency governance, one that prioritizes the needs and preferences of the users themselves. Rather than blindly following the dictates of those wielding hash power, users should make informed decisions based on the network's underlying values and capabilities.

施瓦茨主张采用更合理的加密货币治理方法，优先考虑用户本身的需求和偏好。用户不应盲目遵循那些掌握算力的人的指令，而应根据网络的潜在价值和功能做出明智的决定。

"Rational users will choose the network that best meets their needs," Schwartz said. "They will look at the network's characteristics, such as its security, scalability, and fees, and make a decision based on what is most important to them."

“理性的用户会选择最能满足他们需求的网络，”施瓦茨说。 “他们将关注网络的特征，例如安全性、可扩展性和费用，并根据对他们最重要的因素做出决定。”

Implications for the Future

对未来的影响

Schwartz's critique has sparked a wider dialogue within the cryptocurrency community, raising fundamental questions about the nature of governance in decentralized digital currency ecosystems. It highlights the need for robust and adaptable governance models that can effectively represent the will and trust of the communities they serve.

施瓦茨的批评引发了加密货币社区内更广泛的对话，提出了有关去中心化数字货币生态系统治理本质的基本问题。它强调需要强大且适应性强的治理模型，能够有效地代表其所服务的社区的意愿和信任。

As cryptocurrencies continue to evolve, the ongoing debate over governance and identity will play a pivotal role in shaping their future trajectory. Schwartz's challenge to Bitcoin's established power dynamics is a timely reminder of the complexities and challenges involved in navigating the uncharted waters of decentralized governance.

随着加密货币的不断发展，关于治理和身份的持续争论将在塑造其未来发展轨迹方面发挥关键作用。施瓦茨对比特币既定权力动态的挑战及时提醒人们，在去中心化治理的未知领域中航行所涉及的复杂性和挑战。