$HAWK 的快速兴衰

Hawk Tuah memecoin 首次亮相时市值约为 1660 万美元，但数小时内其价值飙升至 4.91 亿美元

A class-action lawsuit has been filed against several parties in connection with the launch and subsequent collapse of the Hawk Tuah (HAWK) memecoin. The lawsuit, filed on December 19, accuses the defendants of promoting and selling unregistered securities and engaging in misleading marketing practices.

与 Hawk Tuah (HAWK) memecoin 的推出和随后的崩溃有关的多方已提起集体诉讼。该诉讼于 12 月 19 日提起，指控被告推销和销售未经注册的证券，并从事误导性营销行为。

The Hawk Tuah memecoin debuted on December 15 with a market capitalization of approximately $16.6 million. However, its value skyrocketed to $491 million within hours of its launch. This meteoric rise was short-lived as the token’s value plummeted by over 90%, leaving investors with substantial losses. By the end of the day, the market cap had fallen to approximately $60 million.

Hawk Tuah memecoin 于 12 月 15 日首次亮相，市值约为 1660 万美元。然而，其价值在推出后数小时内飙升至 4.91 亿美元。这种飞速上涨是短暂的，代币价值暴跌超过 90%，给投资者带来了巨大损失。截至当天收盘，市值已跌至约 6000 万美元。

Several defendants are named in the lawsuit, including OverHere Ltd., Tuah The Moon Foundation, and individuals Clinton So and Alex Larson Schultz (also known as “Doc Hollywood”). The plaintiffs, represented by Burwick Law, claim that these corporations used the prominence of social media influencer Hailey Welch to generate buzz about the token.

诉讼中提到了几名被告，包括 OverHere Ltd.、Tuah The Moon Foundation 以及个人 Clinton So 和 Alex Larson Schultz（也称为“Doc Hollywood”）。以 Burwick Law 为代表的原告声称，这些公司利用社交媒体影响者 Hailey Welch 的知名度来引起有关代币的热议。

Welch, who gained popularity earlier this year with a viral TikTok video, was chosen as the project’s face. Her engagement added credibility to the memecoin, enticing more cryptocurrency investors. Despite her major participation, Welch is not named as a defendant in the claim.

韦尔奇今年早些时候因一段热门 TikTok 视频而走红，被选为该项目的代言人。她的参与增加了模因币的可信度，吸引了更多的加密货币投资者。尽管韦尔奇参与其中，但她并未被列为诉讼中的被告。

“The project clearly targeted the U.S. market by tying the token’s success to Welch’s reputation,” the plaintiffs argued. “This led many to believe they were effectively investing in a share-like asset.”

原告辩称：“该项目明确针对美国市场，将代币的成功与韦尔奇的声誉联系在一起。” “这让许多人相信他们实际上是在投资类似股票的资产。”

According to court filings, a pre-sale of the token raised $2.8 million ahead of its launch. Following the token’s collapse, Clinton So is alleged to have moved Tuah The Moon Foundation offshore and sold 17% of the tokens through the organization to avoid U.S. securities laws. Meanwhile, OverHere Ltd. claimed it did not profit from the project, stating that Doc Hollywood controlled critical aspects, including fees and treasury decisions, but failed to fulfill his responsibilities.

根据法庭文件，该代币在推出前通过预售筹集了 280 万美元。代币崩溃后，克林顿·苏 (Clinton So) 据称将 Tuah The Moon 基金会转移到海外，并通过该组织出售了 17% 的代币，以避免美国证券法。与此同时，OverHere Ltd. 声称它没有从该项目中获利，并表示 Doc Hollywood 控制着关键方面，包括费用和财务决策，但未能履行其职责。

The controversy has drawn widespread criticism of Welch, who faced accusations of participating in a “money-grab scheme.” Welch denied the allegations, stating on the social media platform X: “The team hasn’t sold a single token. We tried to deter snipers by imposing high fees at launch.” Welch has since remained silent on social media, further fueling speculation about her role in the project.

这场争议引起了对韦尔奇的广泛批评，韦尔奇面临参与“抢钱计划”的指控。韦尔奇否认了这些指控，并在社交媒体平台 X 上表示：“团队没有出售任何代币。我们试图通过在发射时收取高额费用来威慑狙击手。”此后，韦尔奇在社交媒体上保持沉默，进一步加剧了人们对她在该项目中所扮演角色的猜测。

Carlo D’Angelo, a crypto attorney not involved in the case, commented on the situation: “This serves as a cautionary tale for influencers who lend their names to crypto ventures without understanding the full scope of their implications.”

未参与此案的加密货币律师 Carlo D'Angelo 对这一情况发表了评论：“对于那些在不了解其影响的全部范围的情况下将自己的名字借给加密企业的影响者来说，这是一个警示故事。”

As the legal proceedings continue, this case serves as a strong reminder to investors to take caution and conduct extensive research before investing in speculative digital assets. However, the defendants have expressed confidence in their legal position, with OverHere Ltd. declaring, “We are confident that we have done nothing wrong and look forward to resolving this matter in court.”

随着法律诉讼的继续，此案强烈提醒投资者在投资投机性数字资产之前要谨慎行事并进行广泛的研究。然而，被告对自己的法律地位表示有信心，OverHere Ltd. 宣称，“我们相信我们没有做错任何事，并期待在法庭上解决此事。”