Pi Coin最近达到了120亿美元的市值，但由于代币，移民失败和Binance列出了谣言盘旋

PI Network是一个雄心勃勃的智能手机矿业项目，声称收集了令人印象深刻的6000万用户，已经完成了许多曾经认为不可能的事情

Pi Coin, the token linked to the smartphone mining project Pi Network, has reportedly hit a $12 billion market cap as rumors of a Binance listing on March 14 swirl.

据报道，与智能手机矿业项目PI网络相关的代币Pi Coin据报道，在3月14日旋转的Binance上市的谣言中，市值达到了120亿美元的市值。

The project, which claims to have amassed 60 million users through a unique model that combines Stellar Consensus Protocol with minimal energy-efficient mining via a daily button tap, has seen its token price slide from an all-time high of $2.99 on February 26 to $1.71 on March 12.

该项目声称通过一种独特的模型积累了6000万用户，该模型将出色的共识协议与每日纽扣的节能采矿最少结合在一起，它的代价价格从2月26日的历史最高售价为2.99美元，至3月12日的历史最低点。

Despite this setback, which saw its market cap drop from $17.9 billion to $12.26 billion, Pi Coin has managed to rise to 11th place in the overall crypto market cap rankings. It is also the most trending coin on platforms like CoinGecko and CoinMarketCap.

尽管这种挫折使市值从179亿美元下降到122.6亿美元，但Pi Coin在整个加密市政上限排名中却设法上升到第11位。它也是Coingecko和CoinMarketCap等平台上最流行的硬币。

Furthermore, with a 24-hour trading volume of over $500 million and a reported 20% price increase, Pi Coin is outperforming the broader crypto market, which has seen Bitcoin (BTC) struggle to stay afloat.

此外，Pi Coin的交易量超过5亿美元，据报道价格上涨了20％，Pi Coin的表现要优于更广泛的加密市场，该市场已经使比特币（BTC）努力保持漂浮。

However, the launch of Pi Coin has not been without its fair share of difficulties.

但是，Pi Coin的发布并非没有相当大的困难。

Recently, there have been reports of users losing their Pi tokens after unlocking them, with some having fallen victim to scams due to previous interactions with fake Pi-related websites.

最近，有报道称用户解锁后失去了PI令牌，由于以前与假PI相关的网站进行了互动，有些人因骗局而失去了PI令牌。

This issue has led to frustration among the Pioneers, who are facing difficulties migrating their Pi to the mainnet before the March 14, 08:00 UTC deadline.

这个问题导致了开拓者的挫败感，他们正面临将PI迁移到3月14日UTC截止日期之前的困难。

Despite completing the mainnet checklist and attempting to contact Pi for assistance, some users are still encountering problems, putting a strain on their patience.

尽管完成了主网清单并试图与PI联系以寻求帮助，但一些用户仍遇到问题，给他们的耐心带来压力。

One blockchain developer went so far as to call out Pi Network directly, deeming their migration process “fraudulent and deceptive” and encouraging regulators to intervene.

一位区块链开发人员甚至直接召集了PI网络，认为他们的迁移过程“欺诈和欺骗性”，并鼓励监管机构进行干预。

He highlighted the stark difference in transaction throughput between Pi and other blockchains like Solana (SOL) and Polygon (POL), which can handle thousands of transactions per second. In contrast, Pi users have been queuing for months, if not years, to transfer their tokens.

他强调了PI和其他区块链（如Solana（Sol）和Polygon（POL）（POL）之间的交易吞吐量的明显差异，这些区块链每秒可以处理数千笔交易。相比之下，PI用户已经排队几个月（即使不是几年）来转移令牌。

He questioned how a blockchain that operates like this can be sustainable in the long term, especially considering the vast sums of money that have been contributed by its users to purchase hardware and maintain the network.

他质疑这样的区块链从长远来看如何可持续，尤其是考虑到其用户为购买硬件和维护网络贡献的巨额资金。

Moreover, he expressed concerns over the lack of decentralization in Pi Network, stating that it appears to be a centralized entity where the core team holds complete control, in contrast to the decentralized nature of blockchain technology.

此外，他对PI网络中缺乏分散化的关注表示关注，并指出，与区块链技术的分散性质相比，核心团队拥有完全控制的集中式实体。

The blockchain developer also touched upon the fact that millions of users have submitted sensitive personal data, including passports and government IDs, to pass KYC, yet they’re being forced to wait indefinitely to access their funds.

区块链开发人员还谈到了以下事实：数百万用户已经提交了包括护照和政府ID在内的敏感个人数据，以通过KYC，但他们被迫无限期地等待以获取资金。

He questioned how a project that claims to be operating in good faith can treat its community with such disregard.

他质疑声称自己真诚运作的项目如何通过这种无视对待其社区。

Finally, he pointed out that Pi Network's app generates revenue from ads, which raises further questions about the project's priorities and financial incentives.

最后，他指出，PI Network的应用程序从广告中产生收入，这对项目的优先事项和经济激励措施提出了进一步的疑问。

In response to Zhou's claims, Pi Network issued a statement attempting to clear up any misunderstandings.

为了回应周的主张，PI Network发表了一份声明，试图清除任何误解。

The team distanced itself from the Chinese police warning, asserting that it targeted bad actors who were falsely using the Pi name to carry out illegal activities, and had nothing to do with Pi Network itself or its core team members.

该团队与中国警察的警告保持距离，并断言，它针对错误的演员，他们错误地使用PI名称进行非法活动，并且与PI Network本身或其核心团队成员无关。

They went on to reject any allegations of misconduct, stressing that the project has operated transparently and methodically over the past six years to build a valuable ecosystem for its community.

他们继续拒绝任何关于不当行为的指控，并强调该项目在过去六年中一直在透明，有条不紊地运作，以为其社区建立宝贵的生态系统。

Furthermore, they clarified that they had no affiliation with the social media account that had attacked Zhou personally, and neither Pi Network nor its team members had ever made any disparaging comments about Bybit or its leadership.

此外，他们澄清说，他们与亲自攻击周的社交媒体帐户没有隶属关系，而PI Network和其团队成员都没有对Bybit或其领导层发表任何贬低的评论。

Finally, they invited Zhou to engage in open communication if he has any questions or concerns about Pi Network or its operations.

最后，如果周对PI网络或其运营有任何疑问或疑虑，他们邀请周进行开放沟通。