Pi Coin最近達到了120億美元的市值，但由於代幣，移民失敗和Binance列出了謠言盤旋

PI Network是一個雄心勃勃的智能手機礦業項目，聲稱收集了令人印象深刻的6000萬用戶，已經完成了許多曾經認為不可能的事情

Pi Coin, the token linked to the smartphone mining project Pi Network, has reportedly hit a $12 billion market cap as rumors of a Binance listing on March 14 swirl.

據報導，與智能手機礦業項目PI網絡相關的代幣Pi Coin據報導，在3月14日旋轉的Binance上市的謠言中，市值達到了120億美元的市值。

The project, which claims to have amassed 60 million users through a unique model that combines Stellar Consensus Protocol with minimal energy-efficient mining via a daily button tap, has seen its token price slide from an all-time high of $2.99 on February 26 to $1.71 on March 12.

該項目聲稱通過一種獨特的模型積累了6000萬用戶，該模型將出色的共識協議與每日鈕扣的節能採礦最少結合在一起，它的代價價格從2月26日的歷史最高售價為2.99美元，至3月12日的歷史最低點。

Despite this setback, which saw its market cap drop from $17.9 billion to $12.26 billion, Pi Coin has managed to rise to 11th place in the overall crypto market cap rankings. It is also the most trending coin on platforms like CoinGecko and CoinMarketCap.

儘管這種挫折使市值從179億美元下降到122.6億美元，但Pi Coin在整個加密市政上限排名中卻設法上升到第11位。它也是Coingecko和CoinMarketCap等平台上最流行的硬幣。

Furthermore, with a 24-hour trading volume of over $500 million and a reported 20% price increase, Pi Coin is outperforming the broader crypto market, which has seen Bitcoin (BTC) struggle to stay afloat.

此外，Pi Coin的交易量超過5億美元，據報導價格上漲了20％，Pi Coin的表現要優於更廣泛的加密市場，該市場已經使比特幣（BTC）努力保持漂浮。

However, the launch of Pi Coin has not been without its fair share of difficulties.

但是，Pi Coin的發布並非沒有相當多的困難。

Recently, there have been reports of users losing their Pi tokens after unlocking them, with some having fallen victim to scams due to previous interactions with fake Pi-related websites.

最近，有報導稱用戶解鎖後失去了PI令牌，由於以前與假PI相關的網站進行了互動，有些人因騙局而失去了PI令牌。

This issue has led to frustration among the Pioneers, who are facing difficulties migrating their Pi to the mainnet before the March 14, 08:00 UTC deadline.

這個問題導致了開拓者的挫敗感，他們正面臨將PI遷移到3月14日UTC截止日期之前的困難。

Despite completing the mainnet checklist and attempting to contact Pi for assistance, some users are still encountering problems, putting a strain on their patience.

儘管完成了主網清單並試圖與PI聯繫以尋求幫助，但一些用戶仍遇到問題，給他們的耐心帶來壓力。

One blockchain developer went so far as to call out Pi Network directly, deeming their migration process “fraudulent and deceptive” and encouraging regulators to intervene.

一位區塊鏈開發人員甚至直接召集了PI網絡，認為他們的遷移過程“欺詐和欺騙性”，並鼓勵監管機構進行干預。

He highlighted the stark difference in transaction throughput between Pi and other blockchains like Solana (SOL) and Polygon (POL), which can handle thousands of transactions per second. In contrast, Pi users have been queuing for months, if not years, to transfer their tokens.

他強調了PI和其他區塊鏈（如Solana（Sol）和Polygon（POL）（POL）之間的交易吞吐量的明顯差異，這些區塊鏈每秒可以處理數千筆交易。相比之下，PI用戶已經排隊幾個月（即使不是幾年）來轉移令牌。

He questioned how a blockchain that operates like this can be sustainable in the long term, especially considering the vast sums of money that have been contributed by its users to purchase hardware and maintain the network.

他質疑這樣的區塊鏈從長遠來看如何可持續，尤其是考慮到其用戶為購買硬件和維護網絡貢獻的巨額資金。

Moreover, he expressed concerns over the lack of decentralization in Pi Network, stating that it appears to be a centralized entity where the core team holds complete control, in contrast to the decentralized nature of blockchain technology.

此外，他對PI網絡中缺乏分散化的關注表示關注，並指出，與區塊鏈技術的分散性質相比，核心團隊擁有完全控制的集中式實體。

The blockchain developer also touched upon the fact that millions of users have submitted sensitive personal data, including passports and government IDs, to pass KYC, yet they’re being forced to wait indefinitely to access their funds.

區塊鏈開發人員還談到了以下事實：數百萬用戶已經提交了包括護照和政府ID在內的敏感個人數據，以通過KYC，但他們被迫無限期地等待以獲取資金。

He questioned how a project that claims to be operating in good faith can treat its community with such disregard.

他質疑聲稱自己真誠運作的項目如何通過這種無視對待其社區。

Finally, he pointed out that Pi Network's app generates revenue from ads, which raises further questions about the project's priorities and financial incentives.

最後，他指出，PI Network的應用程序從廣告中產生收入，這對項目的優先事項和經濟激勵措施提出了進一步的疑問。

In response to Zhou's claims, Pi Network issued a statement attempting to clear up any misunderstandings.

為了回應週的主張，PI Network發表了一份聲明，試圖清除任何誤解。

The team distanced itself from the Chinese police warning, asserting that it targeted bad actors who were falsely using the Pi name to carry out illegal activities, and had nothing to do with Pi Network itself or its core team members.

該團隊與中國警察的警告保持距離，並斷言，它針對錯誤的演員，他們錯誤地使用PI名稱進行非法活動，並且與PI Network本身或其核心團隊成員無關。

They went on to reject any allegations of misconduct, stressing that the project has operated transparently and methodically over the past six years to build a valuable ecosystem for its community.

他們繼續拒絕任何關於不當行為的指控，並強調該項目在過去六年中一直在透明，有條不紊地運作，以為其社區建立寶貴的生態系統。

Furthermore, they clarified that they had no affiliation with the social media account that had attacked Zhou personally, and neither Pi Network nor its team members had ever made any disparaging comments about Bybit or its leadership.

此外，他們澄清說，他們與親自攻擊週的社交媒體帳戶沒有隸屬關係，而PI Network和其團隊成員都沒有對Bybit或其領導層發表任何貶低的評論。

Finally, they invited Zhou to engage in open communication if he has any questions or concerns about Pi Network or its operations.

最後，如果週對PI網絡或其運營有任何疑問或疑慮，他們邀請週進行開放溝通。