在短暂挤压鲸鱼精心策划后，炒作的价格低于20％

Hype的价格发出了鼻子，一天中下降了20％。这种急剧下降是由于$果冻鲸鱼精心策划的短暂挤压的结果，导致损失超过1200万美元。

The price of HYPE, a popular DeFi token, experienced a significant drop of 20% in a single day, following a short squeeze orchestrated by $Jelly whales, resulting in losses exceeding $12 million. Despite the incident, the token’s price is still holding a support level, and a price recovery is likely soon.

受欢迎的Defi代币的炒作价格在一天中的一场短暂的挤压中，$果冻鲸鱼精心策划，导致损失超过1200万美元，这一价格下降了20％。尽管发生了事件，令牌的价格仍在保持支持水平，而且价格恢复很快。

As reported by blockchain analytics firm Messari, Hyperliquid, a DEX specializing in perpetual futures trading, made headlines after a large number of whales opened a huge $6M short position on Jelly (40% of token supply) and a long position simultaneously.

正如区块链分析公司Messari报道的那样，专门从事永久期货交易的DEX Hyperliquid在大量鲸鱼在Jelly（占代币供应量的40％）和长位置同时占据了600万美元的职位后，成为了头条新闻。

The massive position, which was leveraged at 10x, got liquidated immediately as the price of Jelly went up, and Hyperliquid was supposed to buy up 40% of the supply from the order book, pumping the price and putting the trader’s long in profit.

在果冻的价格上涨时，巨大的位置以10倍的速度被杠杆化，并立即被清算，而超级流动性应该从订单簿中收购40％的供应量，降低价格并使交易者长期以来的利润。

But instead, Hyperliquid decided to open a short position on $JELLY, potentially to liquidate the trader and prevent them from rugging the protocol. However, the community started to pump JELLY to liquidate Hyperliquid, as the DEX now faces full liquidation if $JELLY hits a $150 million market cap (currently about 3x away).

但是，相反，Hyperliquid决定在$ Jelly上打开一个短姿势，可能是为了清算交易者并防止其加固协议。但是，社区开始抽果冻以清算过度流动性，因为如果$果冻达到1.5亿美元的市值（目前约3倍），DEX现在将面临完全清算。

There are reports of users withdrawing funds from the protocol, reducing Hyperliquid’s short-position collateral, and bringing liquidation closer. While critics view the move by the DEX as unethical, with some even comparing it to FTX 2.0 for its centralized governance, the drama took a new turn with on-chain sleuths suggesting the involvement of Binance-linked wallets to sabotage the DEX.

有报道称，用户从协议中撤回资金，减少了超流动性的短定位抵押品，并使清算更加接近。尽管批评家将DEX的举动视为不道德的举动，但有些甚至将其与FTX 2.0进行了比较，但该戏剧带有新的转变，并在链上侦探表明，与Binance链接的钱包有关，以破坏Dex。

According to ZachXBT, two wallets (0x20E8 and 0x67f) were the key players in the JELLY token incident, further fueling speculation of coordinated market manipulation.

根据Zachxbt的说法，两个钱包（0x20E8和0x67F）是果冻代币事件中的主要参与者，进一步加剧了人们对协调市场操作的猜测。

Moreover, Binance and OKX listing $JELLY perps despite the incident might indicate an underlying rivalry between CEXes and DEXs, leading many on X to assert that Binance is purposely trying to get Hyperliquid liquidated.

此外，尽管事件发生了这一事件，但Binance和OKX列出了$ Jelly Perps，这可能表明CEXES和DEX之间的基本竞争，导致X上的许多人断言Binance是故意试图敲击过度液体的。