在短暫擠壓鯨魚精心策劃後，炒作的價格低於20％

Hype的價格發出了鼻子，一天中下降了20％。這種急劇下降是由於$果凍鯨魚精心策劃的短暫擠壓的結果，導致損失超過1200萬美元。

The price of HYPE, a popular DeFi token, experienced a significant drop of 20% in a single day, following a short squeeze orchestrated by $Jelly whales, resulting in losses exceeding $12 million. Despite the incident, the token’s price is still holding a support level, and a price recovery is likely soon.

受歡迎的Defi代幣的炒作價格在一天中的一場短暫的擠壓中，$果凍鯨魚精心策劃，導致損失超過1200萬美元，這一價格下降了20％。儘管發生了事件，令牌的價格仍在保持支持水平，而且價格恢復很快。

As reported by blockchain analytics firm Messari, Hyperliquid, a DEX specializing in perpetual futures trading, made headlines after a large number of whales opened a huge $6M short position on Jelly (40% of token supply) and a long position simultaneously.

正如區塊鏈分析公司Messari報導的那樣，專門從事永久期貨交易的DEX Hyperliquid在大量鯨魚在Jelly（佔代幣供應量的40％）和長位置同時佔據了600萬美元的職位後，成為了頭條新聞。

The massive position, which was leveraged at 10x, got liquidated immediately as the price of Jelly went up, and Hyperliquid was supposed to buy up 40% of the supply from the order book, pumping the price and putting the trader’s long in profit.

在果凍的價格上漲時，巨大的位置以10倍的速度被槓桿化，並立即被清算，而超級流動性應該從訂單簿中收購40％的供應量，降低價格並使交易者長期以來的利潤。

But instead, Hyperliquid decided to open a short position on $JELLY, potentially to liquidate the trader and prevent them from rugging the protocol. However, the community started to pump JELLY to liquidate Hyperliquid, as the DEX now faces full liquidation if $JELLY hits a $150 million market cap (currently about 3x away).

但是，相反，Hyperliquid決定在$ Jelly上打開一個短姿勢，可能是為了清算交易者並防止其加固協議。但是，社區開始抽果凍以清算過度流動性，因為如果$果凍達到1.5億美元的市值（目前約3倍），DEX現在將面臨完全清算。

There are reports of users withdrawing funds from the protocol, reducing Hyperliquid’s short-position collateral, and bringing liquidation closer. While critics view the move by the DEX as unethical, with some even comparing it to FTX 2.0 for its centralized governance, the drama took a new turn with on-chain sleuths suggesting the involvement of Binance-linked wallets to sabotage the DEX.

有報導稱，用戶從協議中撤回資金，減少了超流動性的短定位抵押品，並使清算更加接近。儘管批評家將DEX的舉動視為不道德的舉動，但有些甚至將其與FTX 2.0進行了比較，但該戲劇帶有新的轉變，並在鏈上偵探表明，與Binance鏈接的錢包有關，以破壞Dex。

According to ZachXBT, two wallets (0x20E8 and 0x67f) were the key players in the JELLY token incident, further fueling speculation of coordinated market manipulation.

根據Zachxbt的說法，兩個錢包（0x20E8和0x67F）是果凍代幣事件中的主要參與者，進一步加劇了人們對協調市場操作的猜測。

Moreover, Binance and OKX listing $JELLY perps despite the incident might indicate an underlying rivalry between CEXes and DEXs, leading many on X to assert that Binance is purposely trying to get Hyperliquid liquidated.

此外，儘管事件發生了這一事件，但Binance和OKX列出了$ Jelly Perps，這可能表明CEXES和DEX之間的基本競爭，導致X上的許多人斷言Binance是故意試圖敲擊過度液體的。