Griffain 与 Neur：哪个基于 Solana 的 AI 助手会获胜？

Griffain 和 Neur 都是基于 Solana 构建的人工智能助手。这两个类似的平台哪一个会胜出？本文将为您进行对比分析。

Crypto KOL Wheaties recently shared their thoughts on two AI assistants built on Solana, Griffain and Neur. Both platforms offer a range of features, but which one will come out on top? Here's a comparative analysis.

Crypto KOL Wheaties 最近分享了他们对基于 Solana、Griffain 和 Neur 的两款人工智能助手的想法。这两个平台都提供了一系列功能，但哪一个会脱颖而出呢？这里进行一下对比分析。

Core Features

核心特点

Let's first explore the different features offered by each platform. As you can see in the image below, Griffain provides users with more and broader features. However, Neur's features are relatively more detailed.

让我们首先探讨一下每个平台提供的不同功能。如下图所示，Griffain 为用户提供了更多、更广泛的功能。不过Neur的特征相对更详细。

Griffain

格里芬

Neur

我的

User Experience

用户体验

The overall experience with both Neur and Griffain is good, but Neur is smoother and faster.

Neur 和 Griffain 的整体体验都不错，但 Neur 更流畅、更快。

That said, the two apps serve different purposes. If you're looking for a friendlier user experience, smoother user flow, and multi-device compatibility, consider Neur.

也就是说，这两个应用程序有不同的用途。如果您正在寻找更友好的用户体验、更流畅的用户流程和多设备兼容性，请考虑 Neur。

If you're looking for powerful presets and more customization, Griffain might be a better fit.

如果您正在寻找强大的预设和更多的自定义功能，Griffain 可能更适合。

Accessibility / Cost

可达性/成本

Both apps are very accessible, with Griffain skipping the usual invite link and Neur being accessible with just a single click.

这两款应用程序都非常易于访问，Griffain 跳过了通常的邀请链接，而 Neur 只需单击一下即可访问。

The main difference is the fee. Griffain charges an upfront fee of 2 SOL, while Neur only charges an upfront fee of 1 SOL. However, Griffain will deposit 0.5 SOL of it into the user's proxy wallet, so the actual fee of Griffain is about 1.5 SOL.

主要区别在于费用。 Griffain 收取 2 SOL 的预付费用，而 Neur 仅收取 1 SOL 的预付费用。但Griffain会将其0.5 SOL存入用户的代理钱包，因此Griffain的实际费用约为1.5 SOL。

Performance

表现

In terms of performance, both Griffain and Neur performed well, but Neur performed slightly better overall. As mentioned earlier, although Griffain provides a wider range of functions, Neur's functions are more detailed. The most outstanding feature of Neur is the ability to correct errors instantly.

表现方面，格里芬和诺尔都表现出色，但诺尔整体表现稍好一些。前面提到，虽然Griffain提供了更广泛的功能，但是Neur的功能更加详细。 Neur 最突出的特点是能够即时纠正错误。

Griffain

格里芬

Neur

我的

Unique Features

独特的特点

For Neur, it excels in fully open source multi-device compatibility, while Griffain stands out for its extensive autonomy and customization capabilities.

对于 Neur 来说，它在完全开源的多设备兼容性方面表现出色，而 Griffain 则因其广泛的自主性和定制能力而脱颖而出。

Compatibility / Integration

兼容性/集成

While it is not possible to confirm all integrations available on Griffain, the two platforms are integrated enough to provide all the basic functionality required for a nearly complete Solana experience.

虽然无法确认 Griffain 上可用的所有集成，但这两个平台的集成程度足以提供近乎完整的 Solana 体验所需的所有基本功能。

Griffain

格里芬

Neur

我的

Conclusion

结论

While the article may seem to suggest that Neur is the better application, and perhaps for the average user it is, for users who want a more automated, customized experience, Griffain excels in this regard.

虽然这篇文章似乎表明 Neur 是更好的应用程序，也许对于普通用户来说确实如此，但对于想要更加自动化、定制化体验的用户来说，Griffain 在这方面表现出色。

In other words, if you really want to dig in and optimize your search, Griffain is the app for you. If you want a simpler, more direct approach, Neur is a better fit.

换句话说，如果您确实想深入挖掘并优化搜索，Griffain 就是您的最佳选择。如果你想要一种更简单、更直接的方法，Neur 更适合。

Related Reading: A Horizontal Comparison of the Four Major AI Agent Frameworks: Adoption Status, Advantages and Disadvantages, and Token Growth Potential

相关阅读：四大AI代理框架的横向比较：采用现状、优缺点以及代币增长潜力