Griffain 與 Neur：哪個基於 Solana 的 AI 助理會獲勝？

Griffain 和 Neur 都是基於 Solana 構建的人工智慧助理。這兩個類似的平台哪一個會勝出？本文將為您進行比較分析。

Crypto KOL Wheaties recently shared their thoughts on two AI assistants built on Solana, Griffain and Neur. Both platforms offer a range of features, but which one will come out on top? Here's a comparative analysis.

Crypto KOL Wheaties 最近分享了他們對基於 Solana、Griffain 和 Neur 的兩款人工智慧助理的想法。這兩個平台都提供了一系列功能，但哪一個會脫穎而出呢？這裡進行一下比較分析。

Core Features

核心特點

Let's first explore the different features offered by each platform. As you can see in the image below, Griffain provides users with more and broader features. However, Neur's features are relatively more detailed.

讓我們先探討一下每個平台提供的不同功能。如下圖所示，Griffain 為使用者提供了更多、更廣泛的功能。不過Neur的特徵相對更詳細一些。

Griffain

格里芬

Neur

我的

User Experience

使用者體驗

The overall experience with both Neur and Griffain is good, but Neur is smoother and faster.

Neur 和 Griffain 的整體體驗都不錯，但 Neur 更流暢、更快。

That said, the two apps serve different purposes. If you're looking for a friendlier user experience, smoother user flow, and multi-device compatibility, consider Neur.

也就是說，這兩個應用程式有不同的用途。如果您正在尋找更友善的使用者體驗、更流暢的使用者流程和多裝置相容性，請考慮 Neur。

If you're looking for powerful presets and more customization, Griffain might be a better fit.

如果您正在尋找強大的預設和更多的自訂功能，Griffain 可能更適合。

Accessibility / Cost

可及性/成本

Both apps are very accessible, with Griffain skipping the usual invite link and Neur being accessible with just a single click.

這兩款應用程式都非常易於訪問，Griffain 跳過了通常的邀請鏈接，而 Neur 只需單擊即可訪問。

The main difference is the fee. Griffain charges an upfront fee of 2 SOL, while Neur only charges an upfront fee of 1 SOL. However, Griffain will deposit 0.5 SOL of it into the user's proxy wallet, so the actual fee of Griffain is about 1.5 SOL.

主要差別在於費用。 Griffain 收取 2 SOL 的預付費用，而 Neur 僅收取 1 SOL 的預付費用。但Griffain會將其0.5 SOL存入用戶的代理錢包，因此Griffain的實際費用約為1.5 SOL。

Performance

表現

In terms of performance, both Griffain and Neur performed well, but Neur performed slightly better overall. As mentioned earlier, although Griffain provides a wider range of functions, Neur's functions are more detailed. The most outstanding feature of Neur is the ability to correct errors instantly.

表現方面，格里芬和諾爾都表現出色，但諾爾整體表現稍好。前面提到，雖然Griffain提供了更廣泛的功能，但Neur的功能更加詳細。 Neur 最突出的特點是能夠即時修正錯誤。

Griffain

格里芬

Neur

我的

Unique Features

獨特的特點

For Neur, it excels in fully open source multi-device compatibility, while Griffain stands out for its extensive autonomy and customization capabilities.

對於 Neur 來說，它在完全開源的多設備相容性方面表現出色，而 Griffain 則因其廣泛的自主性和自訂能力而脫穎而出。

Compatibility / Integration

相容性/集成

While it is not possible to confirm all integrations available on Griffain, the two platforms are integrated enough to provide all the basic functionality required for a nearly complete Solana experience.

雖然無法確認 Griffain 上可用的所有集成，但這兩個平台的集成程度足以提供近乎完整的 Solana 體驗​​所需的所有基本功能。

Griffain

格里芬

Neur

我的

Conclusion

結論

While the article may seem to suggest that Neur is the better application, and perhaps for the average user it is, for users who want a more automated, customized experience, Griffain excels in this regard.

雖然這篇文章似乎表明 Neur 是更好的應用程序，也許對於普通用戶來說確實如此，但對於想要更加自動化、客製化體驗的用戶來說，Griffain 在這方面表現出色。

In other words, if you really want to dig in and optimize your search, Griffain is the app for you. If you want a simpler, more direct approach, Neur is a better fit.

換句話說，如果您確實想深入挖掘並優化搜索，Griffain 就是適合您的應用程式。如果你想要一種更簡單、更直接的方法，Neur 更適合。

Related Reading: A Horizontal Comparison of the Four Major AI Agent Frameworks: Adoption Status, Advantages and Disadvantages, and Token Growth Potential

相關閱讀：四大AI代理框架的橫向比較：採用現狀、優缺點以及代幣成長潛力