福克斯新闻的杰西·沃特斯对自由党边缘的误导性“揭露”失败了

在杰西·沃特斯的新专辑《Get It Together》中，他声称通过采访不同的人来探索所谓的“自由主义边缘”。然而，这本书在承诺和执行上都没有达到预期。沃特斯的研究对象往往缺乏政治参与，而那些右倾或对右翼观点表示同情的人也没有受到任何有意义的深度研究。这本书的主题选择和框架呈现了对左派的刻板和负面看法，同时为沃特斯的标志性嘲讽旁白提供了一个容易的目标。

Fox News' Jesse Watters Unveils Deceptive 'Expose' of Liberal Fringe, Falls Short

福克斯新闻的杰西·沃特斯揭露了自由派边缘的欺骗性“揭露”，但效果不佳

In the midst of a tumultuous political landscape, Fox News' Jesse Watters has embarked on a purported exploration of the "liberal fringe" in his latest book, "Get It Together." However, this ostensible investigation, which has ascended to the apex of the New York Times bestseller list, falls woefully short of its lofty ambitions, marred by a glaring lack of objectivity, intellectual rigor, and journalistic ethics.

在动荡的政治格局中，福克斯新闻的杰西·沃特斯在他的最新著作《团结起来》中开始了对“自由主义边缘”的探索。然而，这项表面上已登上《纽约时报》畅销书排行榜榜首的调查，由于明显缺乏客观性、学术严谨性和新闻道德，远远没有达到其崇高的抱负。

Misleading Marketing and Misrepresented Subjects

误导性营销和歪曲主题

The book's cover entices readers with the promise of "troubling tales from the liberal fringe," an intriguing premise that Watters purports to deliver upon through interviews with an array of purportedly fringe characters. However, a closer examination reveals a profound disconnect between the book's marketing and its actual contents.

该书的封面以“来自自由主义边缘的令人不安的故事”的承诺来吸引读者，沃特斯声称通过对一系列据称是边缘人物的采访来传达这一有趣的前提。然而，仔细研究就会发现这本书的营销与其实际内容之间存在深刻的脱节。

Many of the individuals featured in Watters' narrative have tenuous connections to liberalism, if any at all. Take, for example, the "professional cuddler," the woman who found solace in an emotional support squirrel, and the two vegans who simply shared their dietary preferences. These individuals hardly constitute the vanguard of a nefarious political movement.

沃特斯叙述中的许多人与自由主义（如果有的话）有着微弱的联系。以“专业拥抱者”为例，这位女士在情感支持松鼠身上找到了慰藉，而两位素食主义者只是简单地分享了自己的饮食偏好。这些人很难构成邪恶政治运动的先锋。

More alarmingly, Watters includes an interview with Ayo Kimathi, a self-proclaimed Black nationalist extremist who vehemently denounces liberalism and has been associated with neo-Nazi and Ku Klux Klan leaders. Kimathi's presence in a book purportedly exposing the dangers of liberalism is not only bizarre but also intellectually dishonest.

更令人震惊的是，沃特斯收录了对阿约·基马蒂 (Ayo Kimathi) 的采访，他自称是黑人民族主义极端分子，强烈谴责自由主义，并与新纳粹和三K党领导人有联系。基马蒂出现在一本据称揭露自由主义危险的书中不仅很奇怪，而且在智力上也是不诚实的。

caricature Of Liberalism

自由主义的漫画

While Watters suggests that he is interested in exploring "radicals" of all stripes, his relentless focus on individuals with unconventional lifestyles betrays an underlying agenda. Rather than engaging with genuine leftist ideology, Watters presents a caricature of liberalism as a force that encourages emotional dependency, drug abuse, and niche identities.

虽然沃特斯表示他有兴趣探索各种“激进派”，但他对非传统生活方式个人的不懈关注背叛了一个潜在的议程。沃特斯并没有参与真正的左翼意识形态，而是将自由主义讽刺为一种鼓励情感依赖、吸毒和利基身份的力量。

This approach is a continuation of Watters' on-air persona, in which he has gained notoriety for antagonizing individuals with opposing viewpoints. His book, too, is peppered with condescending asides and judgments, undermining the credibility of his interviews and exposing his lack of empathy for those he supposedly seeks to understand.

这种做法是沃特斯在广播中形象的延续，他因与持相反观点的人对抗而声名狼藉。他的书中也充满了居高临下的旁白和判断，破坏了他采访的可信度，并暴露了他对那些他本应寻求理解的人缺乏同理心。

Lack of Context and Scholarship

缺乏背景和学术

The interviews in "Get It Together" are presented as isolated accounts, devoid of any contextualization or research. Watters fails to provide data or evidence to support the assertions made by his interviewees or to acknowledge the broader political and social forces shaping their beliefs.

《Get It Together》中的采访是作为孤立的叙述呈现的，缺乏任何情境化或研究。沃特斯未能提供数据或证据来支持受访者的主张，也未能承认塑造他们信仰的更广泛的政治和社会力量。

The absence of quality prose and readable narrative further detracts from the book's credibility. Watters' writing is often clumsy and meandering, lacking the rigor and clarity necessary for a serious examination of complex social issues.

缺乏高质量的散文和可读的叙述进一步降低了这本书的可信度。沃特斯的写作常常笨拙而曲折，缺乏认真审视复杂社会问题所需的严谨性和清晰度。

Blind Spot for Right-Wing Extremism

右翼极端主义的盲点

Despite his purported interest in radicalism, Watters exhibits a conspicuous blind spot when it comes to the far right. He ignores the growing trend of individuals gravitating from new-age spiritual practices to political conspiracy theories and right-wing ideologies.

尽管沃特斯声称对激进主义感兴趣，但他在极右翼方面表现出了明显的盲点。他忽视了个人从新时代精神实践转向政治阴谋论和右翼意识形态的日益增长的趋势。

Moreover, Watters fails to acknowledge the threat posed by white supremacist groups, despite their involvement in numerous violent incidents, including the January 6th attack on the U.S. Capitol. This omission is particularly glaring given Watters' own acknowledgment of the potential for violence stemming from trauma-driven extremism.

此外，沃特斯未能承认白人至上主义团体所构成的威胁，尽管他们参与了许多暴力事件，包括 1 月 6 日对美国国会大厦的袭击。鉴于沃特斯本人承认创伤驱动的极端主义可能引发暴力，这一遗漏尤其明显。

Dangerous and Divisive Narrative

危险且分裂的叙述

"Get It Together" is not merely a poorly written book; it is a dangerous and divisive narrative that perpetuates stereotypes and misrepresents the true nature of political extremism in contemporary America. Watters' portrayal of liberalism as a force that undermines traditional values and incites violence is both unfounded and harmful.

《Get It Together》不仅是一本写得不好的书，而且还是一本写得不好的书。这是一种危险且具有分裂性的叙述，它延续了刻板印象，歪曲了当代美国政治极端主义的真实本质。沃特斯将自由主义描述为破坏传统价值观和煽动暴力的力量，这种说法既没有根据，又有害。

The book's success is a testament to the polarization of American society and the increasing prevalence of misinformation. It is a reminder that journalism requires objectivity, integrity, and a commitment to truth, values that are woefully absent in Jesse Watters' latest offering.

这本书的成功证明了美国社会的两极分化和错误信息的日益盛行。这提醒我们，新闻业需要客观性、正直性和对真理的承诺，而这些价值观在杰西·沃特斯的最新作品中却严重缺失。

In an era marked by political turmoil and social unrest, we need rigorous and honest dialogue, not sensationalized and distorted narratives that serve only to deepen our societal divides. "Get It Together" falls far short of this standard, leaving readers with a distorted and incomplete understanding of the complex forces shaping our world.

在政治动荡、社会动荡的时代，我们需要严谨、诚实的对话，而不是煽情和扭曲的叙事，因为这些叙事只会加深我们的社会分歧。 《Get It Together》远远没有达到这个标准，让读者对塑造我们世界的复杂力量有一种扭曲和不完整的理解。