相互冲突的愿景：罗杰·维尔挑战比特币的路线，比特币的未来备受争议

对比特币未来的相互冲突的愿景引发了 Roger Ver 和比特币支持者之间的激烈争论。 Ver 认为，由于少数内部人士带来的挑战，最初的比特币愿景已经消失。关于中心化与可扩展性困境的争论不断升级，比特币现金的支持者主张采取解决基本可扩展性问题的解决方案。随着比特币和比特币现金的相互冲突的愿景发生冲突，社区正在努力解决这两种加密货币是否可以和谐共存的问题。

Conflicting Visions: Can Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash Coexist?

相互冲突的愿景：比特币和比特币现金可以共存吗？

Is the Original Bitcoin Vision Lost?

最初的比特币愿景丢失了吗？

Early Bitcoin investor Roger Ver believes that the original vision of Bitcoin has been compromised by a "modest workforce of insiders." He argues that the software development has been "captured" and that the current direction of Bitcoin (BTC) is a departure from Satoshi Nakamoto's original plan.

早期比特币投资者罗杰·维尔 (Roger Ver) 认为，比特币的最初愿景已被“适度的内部人员”所损害。他认为软件开发已被“捕获”，比特币（BTC）当前的方向背离了中本聪最初的计划。

The Layer-2 Debate: Centralization vs. Scalability?

Layer-2 争论：集中化与可扩展性？

One of the key points of contention between Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash (BCH) is the role of layer-2 solutions. Bitcoiners see layer-2 options as a way to scale the network without increasing block size. BCH proponents, on the other hand, argue that these solutions are centralized and do not address the fundamental scalability issues of Bitcoin.

比特币和比特币现金（BCH）之间争论的关键点之一是第 2 层解决方案的作用。比特币支持者将第 2 层选项视为在不增加区块大小的情况下扩展网络的一种方式。另一方面，BCH 支持者认为这些解决方案是中心化的，并不能解决比特币的基本可扩展性问题。

Who's the Real Satoshi?

谁是真正的中本聪？

Both sides of the Bitcoin-BCH divide claim to be following Satoshi Nakamoto's original vision. Ver maintains that BCH is "the truest representation of Satoshi's eyesight." Others, such as those behind Bitcoin Satoshi's Vision (BSV), also claim to be the true heirs to Nakamoto's legacy.

比特币-BCH 分歧的双方都声称遵循中本聪最初的愿景。 Ver 认为 BCH 是“中本聪眼光的最真实代表”。其他人，例如比特币中本聪愿景（BSV）背后的人，也声称自己是中本聪遗产的真正继承人。

Is Collaboration Possible?

可以合作吗？

Despite the deep divisions, Ver suggests that he is open to collaboration with the BTC community in the future. He believes that as people "get up" and see the flaws in Bitcoin's development, they will recognize the merits of BCH.

尽管分歧很大，Ver 表示他对未来与 BTC 社区的合作持开放态度。他相信，当人们“站起来”并看到比特币发展的缺陷时，他们就会认识到BCH的优点。

The Decentralized Nature of Bitcoin Cash

比特币现金的去中心化本质

Ver emphasizes the decentralized nature of the BCH community, noting that there is no single CEO or leader. He states that the question of a roadmap for BCH is not relevant to him personally, highlighting the community-driven nature of the project.

Ver 强调 BCH 社区的去中心化性质，并指出不存在单一的首席执行官或领导者。他表示，BCH 路线图问题与他个人无关，强调了该项目的社区驱动性质。

Where Does Bitcoin Go from Here?

比特币将何去何从？

According to Ver, "the reserve describes the information." He believes that the market will ultimately determine the fate of both Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash. If people realize that BTC's development has been compromised and that layer-2 solutions have failed to scale Bitcoin, he hopes they will recognize BCH as a viable alternative.

根据维尔的说法，“保护区描述了这些信息。”他认为市场最终将决定比特币和比特币现金的命运。如果人们意识到 BTC 的发展已经受到损害，并且 Layer 2 解决方案无法扩展比特币，他希望他们能够认识到 BCH 是一个可行的替代方案。

Conclusion

结论

The conflict between Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash remains a complex and multifaceted issue. As the market continues to evolve, it is unclear if these competing visions can coexist or if one will ultimately emerge as the dominant blockchain.

比特币和比特币现金之间的冲突仍然是一个复杂且多方面的问题。随着市场的不断发展，目前尚不清楚这些相互竞争的愿景是否可以共存，或者是否最终会成为占主导地位的区块链。