相互衝突的願景：羅傑·維爾挑戰比特幣的路線，比特幣的未來備受爭議

對比特幣未來的相互衝突的願景引發了 Roger Ver 和比特幣支持者之間的激烈爭論。 Ver 認為，由於少數內部人士帶來的挑戰，最初的比特幣願景已經消失。關於中心化與可擴展性困境的爭論不斷升級，比特幣現金的支持者主張採取解決基本可擴展性問題的解決方案。隨著比特幣和比特幣現金的相互衝突的願景發生衝突，社群正在努力解決這兩種加密貨幣是否可以和諧共存的問題。

Conflicting Visions: Can Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash Coexist?

相互衝突的願景：比特幣和比特幣現金可以共存嗎？

Is the Original Bitcoin Vision Lost?

最初的比特幣願景遺失了嗎？

Early Bitcoin investor Roger Ver believes that the original vision of Bitcoin has been compromised by a "modest workforce of insiders." He argues that the software development has been "captured" and that the current direction of Bitcoin (BTC) is a departure from Satoshi Nakamoto's original plan.

早期比特幣投資者羅傑·維爾 (Roger Ver) 認為，比特幣的最初願景已被「適度的內部人員」所損害。他認為軟體開發已被“捕獲”，比特幣（BTC）當前的方向背離了中本聰最初的計劃。

The Layer-2 Debate: Centralization vs. Scalability?

Layer-2 爭論：集中化與可擴展性？

One of the key points of contention between Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash (BCH) is the role of layer-2 solutions. Bitcoiners see layer-2 options as a way to scale the network without increasing block size. BCH proponents, on the other hand, argue that these solutions are centralized and do not address the fundamental scalability issues of Bitcoin.

比特幣和比特幣現金（BCH）之間爭論的關鍵點之一是第 2 層解決方案的作用。比特幣支持者將第 2 層選項視為在不增加區塊大小的情況下擴展網路的一種方式。另一方面，BCH 支持者認為這些解決方案是中心化的，並不能解決比特幣的基本可擴展性問題。

Who's the Real Satoshi?

誰才是真正的中本聰？

Both sides of the Bitcoin-BCH divide claim to be following Satoshi Nakamoto's original vision. Ver maintains that BCH is "the truest representation of Satoshi's eyesight." Others, such as those behind Bitcoin Satoshi's Vision (BSV), also claim to be the true heirs to Nakamoto's legacy.

比特幣-BCH 分歧的雙方都聲稱遵循中本聰最初的願景。 Ver 認為 BCH 是「中本聰眼光最真實的代表」。其他人，例如比特幣中本聰願景（BSV）背後的人，也聲稱自己是中本聰遺產的真正繼承人。

Is Collaboration Possible?

可以合作嗎？

Despite the deep divisions, Ver suggests that he is open to collaboration with the BTC community in the future. He believes that as people "get up" and see the flaws in Bitcoin's development, they will recognize the merits of BCH.

儘管分歧很大，Ver 表示他對未來與 BTC 社群的合作持開放態度。他相信，當人們「站起來」並看到比特幣發展的缺陷時，他們就會認識到BCH的優點。

The Decentralized Nature of Bitcoin Cash

比特幣現金的去中心化本質

Ver emphasizes the decentralized nature of the BCH community, noting that there is no single CEO or leader. He states that the question of a roadmap for BCH is not relevant to him personally, highlighting the community-driven nature of the project.

Ver 強調 BCH 社區的去中心化性質，並指出不存在單一的執行長或領導者。他表示，BCH 路線圖問題與他個人無關，強調了該計畫的社區驅動性質。

Where Does Bitcoin Go from Here?

比特幣將何去何從？

According to Ver, "the reserve describes the information." He believes that the market will ultimately determine the fate of both Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash. If people realize that BTC's development has been compromised and that layer-2 solutions have failed to scale Bitcoin, he hopes they will recognize BCH as a viable alternative.

根據維爾的說法，“保護區描述了這些資訊。”他認為市場最終將決定比特幣和比特幣現金的命運。如果人們意識到 BTC 的發展已經受到損害，而 Layer 2 解決方案無法擴展比特幣，他希望他們能夠認識到 BCH 是一個可行的替代方案。

Conclusion

結論

The conflict between Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash remains a complex and multifaceted issue. As the market continues to evolve, it is unclear if these competing visions can coexist or if one will ultimately emerge as the dominant blockchain.

比特幣和比特幣現金之間的衝突仍然是一個複雜且多方面的問題。隨著市場的不斷發展，目前尚不清楚這些相互競爭的願景是否可以共存，或者是否最終成為主導的區塊鏈。