循环延迟冻结USDC地址链接到Bybit Exchange Hack。 Bybit设法补充了其ETH损失，但仍在寻求损失的资金

链链研究者Zachxbt指出，Circle推迟了与Bybit Exchange Hack相关的USDC地址的冻结。尽管Circle能够冻结地址并弥补损失，但资金仍然可以移动。

On-chain investigator ZachXBT has pointed out that USDC is not cooperating quickly enough with the recovery of funds from the Bybit exchange hack. Some of the funds are held in USDC, which can be frozen by the issuer.

链链调查员ZachXBT指出，美国农业银行（USDC）与从Bybit Exchange Hack收回资金的迅速合作。其中一些资金在USDC中持有，可以由发行人冻结。

The current addresses with funds from the hack are still free to transact, making it possible for the hackers to launder the funds. One of the concerns of ZachXBT is to return as much of the stolen funds as possible. Bybit already managed to refill its ETH losses but still seeks its lost funds on principle. The investigator responded to Jeremy Allaire, co-founder of Circle, aiming to bring attention to the project’s responsibility for controlling losses.

目前带有黑客资金的目前地址仍然可以自由交易，这使黑客可以洗钱。 Zachxbt的关注点之一是返回尽可能多的被盗资金。 Bybit已经设法补充了其ETH损失，但仍在原则上寻求其损失的资金。调查人员对Circle的联合创始人杰里米·阿莱尔（Jeremy Allaire）做出了回应，旨在引起人们对项目控制损失的责任的关注。

The involvement of USDC in the Bybit hack arrives at a time when Circle aims to evolve its stablecoin into a fully legalized payment tool. USDC is the favored stablecoin in Europe and was recently recognized by the Dubai Financial Service Authority. The USDC stablecoin grew by 3.1B tokens in the past three months, mostly due to issuing on Solana.

USDC参与BYBIT HACK是在Circle旨在将其稳定币变成完全合法的付款工具的时候。 USDC是欧洲最受欢迎的Stablecoin，最近受到迪拜金融服务管理局的认可。在过去的三个月中，USDC Stablecoin在3.1B代币中增长了3.1B代币，这主要是由于Solana发行的。

Zoom in: USDC addresses linked to hacker activity

放大：USDC地址链接到黑客活动

The USDC addresses identified by ZachXBT hold just 115K tokens, a small sum compared to the scale of the $1.5B hack. Time is still of the essence in recovering funds, and even a sum of $115K may be relevant in other types of hacks.

Zachxbt确定的USDC地址仅持有115K令牌，与$ 1.5B黑客的规模相比，一小部分。时间仍然是收回资金的本质，即使是$ 115K的总和也可能与其他类型的黑客相关。

The potential to freeze funds from USDC was at first seen as a risk, but the stablecoin has the ability to stop bad actors and restore tokens to their owners. So far, USDC has banned an estimated 268 addresses, with no standard on targeting bad actors and reacting based on blockchain data.

从USDC冻结资金的潜力最初是一种风险，但是Stablecoin具有阻止不良演员并将令牌恢复给所有者的能力。到目前为止，USDC禁止了估计的268个地址，没有针对不良行为者的标准，并根据区块链数据做出反应。

ZachXBT tracked the addresses based on the original transfers of ETH. USDC was chosen as a secondary asset and could be frozen and re-issued. Despite the threat of freezing, bad actors still use the two leading stablecoins, aiming to act fast before the funds are intercepted.

Zachxbt根据ETH的原始转移跟踪了地址。 USDC被选为二级资产，可以冷冻并重新发布。尽管有冻结的威胁，但坏演员仍然使用两个领先的稳定币，旨在在资金被拦截之前快速行动。

Now 0xda2e has 338K USDC after receiving another 222.9K USDC after my post so here’s the tracing explained step by step probably showing its funds from the Bybit hack:

现在，0xDA2E在我的帖子后获得了另外222.9 k USDC之后，有338K USDC，因此，这是一个逐步解释的跟踪，可能是从Bybit Hack中显示其资金：

1). 0xda12 received 204.91 ETH from 0xe41B 31 hours ago in the following transaction: https://t.co/Q5v7G8132v

1）。 0xDA12从0xe41b收到204.91 ETH 31小时前的交易：https：//t.co/Q5V7G8132V

2). 0xe41B deposited 385 ETH to Bybit at 08:00 AM today. This is the same address that paid the Bybit fee in the liquidation transaction.

2）。 0xe41b今天上午08:00将385 ETH存入Bybit。这是在清算交易中支付BYBIT费用的相同地址。

3). 0xda12 then swapped 115K USDC for 199 ETH on CHANGENOW in the following transaction: https://t.co/9yB5mG2z9I

3）。 0xDA12然后在以下交易中将115K USDC换成199 ETH的199 ETH：https：//t.co/9yb5mg2z9i

4). 0xda12 then sent 199 ETH to 0xe41B in the following transaction: https://t.co/79M3mKqOaI

4）。 0xDA12然后在以下交易中发送199 eth至0xe41b：https：//t.co/79m3mkqoai

5). 0xe41B then deposited the 199 ETH to Bybit in the following transaction: https://t.co/R7L7QzR89B

5）。然后，0xe41b在以下交易中将199 ETH存入BYBIT：https：//t.co/r7l7qzr89b

6). Bybit credited the 199 ETH to Bybit user ID 2377101 in the following transaction: https://t.co/y8P7E9mP7E

6）。 BYBIT在以下交易中将199 ETH归功于Bybit用户ID 2377101：https：//t.co/y8p7e9mp7e

7). The user ID 2377101 then withdrew 199 ETH in transaction 14285848 to an address that begins with 0x99f in the following transaction: https://t.co/M75Nq6rJBi

7）。然后，用户ID 2377101然后在交易中撤回199 ETH 14285848到以下交易中以0x99f开头的地址：https：//t.co/m75nq6rjbi

8). The address 0x99f then sent the 199 ETH to 0xda12 in the following transaction: https://t.co/3qG7jO7I8v

8）。地址0x99f然后在以下交易中将199 ETH发送到0xDA12：https：//t.co/3QG7JO7I8V

9). 0xda12 is the same address that sent the 115K USDC to the DeFiChain address.

9）。 0xDA12是将115K USDC发送到Defichain地址的相同地址。

This is a potential chain of events that could have occurred, and it is possible that other events took place. However, this analysis provides a plausible account of how the USDC funds could have been moved and how they are linked to the Bybit hack.

这是可能发生的一系列可能发生的事件，并且可能发生其他事件。但是，该分析提供了一个合理的描述，说明了USDC资金如何被移动以及如何与Bybit Hack相关。

In the past six years since the launch of USDC, crypto users remained skeptical of the freeze function inherent to the USDC token. In theory, Circle could choose to freeze any address for any reason. This time, however, the token issuer has not taken note of the small-scale funds leak.

自USDC推出以来，在过去的六年中，加密用户仍然对USDC令牌固有的冻结功能保持怀疑。从理论上讲，Circle可以出于任何原因选择冻结任何地址。但是，这一次，令牌发行人尚未注意到小规模的资金泄漏。

Circle is working at scale, often issuing $250M mints daily, and has paid little attention to smaller holdings. Circle has still assisted

Circle正在大规模工作，通常每天发行2.5亿美元的造币厂，几乎不关注较小的持股。圈子仍然协助