循環延遲凍結USDC地址鏈接到Bybit Exchange Hack。 Bybit設法補充了其ETH損失，但仍在尋求損失的資金

鍊鍊研究者Zachxbt指出，Circle推遲了與Bybit Exchange Hack相關的USDC地址的凍結。儘管Circle能夠凍結地址並彌補損失，但資金仍然可以移動。

On-chain investigator ZachXBT has pointed out that USDC is not cooperating quickly enough with the recovery of funds from the Bybit exchange hack. Some of the funds are held in USDC, which can be frozen by the issuer.

鍊鍊調查員ZachXBT指出，美國農業銀行（USDC）與從Bybit Exchange Hack收回資金的迅速合作。其中一些資金在USDC中持有，可以由發行人凍結。

The current addresses with funds from the hack are still free to transact, making it possible for the hackers to launder the funds. One of the concerns of ZachXBT is to return as much of the stolen funds as possible. Bybit already managed to refill its ETH losses but still seeks its lost funds on principle. The investigator responded to Jeremy Allaire, co-founder of Circle, aiming to bring attention to the project’s responsibility for controlling losses.

目前帶有黑客資金的目前地址仍然可以自由交易，這使黑客可以洗錢。 Zachxbt的關注點之一是返回盡可能多的被盜資金。 Bybit已經設法補充了其ETH損失，但仍在原則上尋求其損失的資金。調查人員對Circle的聯合創始人傑里米·阿萊爾（Jeremy Allaire）做出了回應，旨在引起人們對項目控制損失的責任的關注。

The involvement of USDC in the Bybit hack arrives at a time when Circle aims to evolve its stablecoin into a fully legalized payment tool. USDC is the favored stablecoin in Europe and was recently recognized by the Dubai Financial Service Authority. The USDC stablecoin grew by 3.1B tokens in the past three months, mostly due to issuing on Solana.

USDC參與BYBIT HACK是在Circle旨在將其穩定幣變成完全合法的付款工具的時候。 USDC是歐洲最受歡迎的Stablecoin，最近受到迪拜金融服務管理局的認可。在過去的三個月中，USDC Stablecoin在3.1B代幣中增長了3.1B代幣，這主要是由於Solana發行的。

Zoom in: USDC addresses linked to hacker activity

放大：USDC地址鏈接到黑客活動

The USDC addresses identified by ZachXBT hold just 115K tokens, a small sum compared to the scale of the $1.5B hack. Time is still of the essence in recovering funds, and even a sum of $115K may be relevant in other types of hacks.

Zachxbt確定的USDC地址僅持有115K令牌，與$ 1.5B黑客的規模相比，一小部分。時間仍然是收回資金的本質，即使是$ 115K的總和也可能與其他類型的黑客相關。

The potential to freeze funds from USDC was at first seen as a risk, but the stablecoin has the ability to stop bad actors and restore tokens to their owners. So far, USDC has banned an estimated 268 addresses, with no standard on targeting bad actors and reacting based on blockchain data.

從USDC凍結資金的潛力最初是一種風險，但是Stablecoin具有阻止不良演員並將令牌恢復給所有者的能力。到目前為止，USDC禁止了估計的268個地址，沒有針對不良行為者的標準，並根據區塊鏈數據做出反應。

ZachXBT tracked the addresses based on the original transfers of ETH. USDC was chosen as a secondary asset and could be frozen and re-issued. Despite the threat of freezing, bad actors still use the two leading stablecoins, aiming to act fast before the funds are intercepted.

Zachxbt根據ETH的原始轉移跟踪了地址。 USDC被選為二級資產，可以冷凍並重新發布。儘管有凍結的威脅，但壞演員仍然使用兩個領先的穩定幣，旨在在資金被攔截之前快速行動。

Now 0xda2e has 338K USDC after receiving another 222.9K USDC after my post so here’s the tracing explained step by step probably showing its funds from the Bybit hack:

現在，0xDA2E在我的帖子後獲得了另外222.9 k USDC之後，有338K USDC，因此，這是一個逐步解釋的跟踪，可能是從Bybit Hack中顯示其資金：

1). 0xda12 received 204.91 ETH from 0xe41B 31 hours ago in the following transaction: https://t.co/Q5v7G8132v

1）。 0xDA12從0xe41b收到204.91 ETH 31小時前的交易：https：//t.co/Q5V7G8132V

2). 0xe41B deposited 385 ETH to Bybit at 08:00 AM today. This is the same address that paid the Bybit fee in the liquidation transaction.

2）。 0xe41b今天上午08:00將385 ETH存入Bybit。這是在清算交易中支付BYBIT費用的相同地址。

3). 0xda12 then swapped 115K USDC for 199 ETH on CHANGENOW in the following transaction: https://t.co/9yB5mG2z9I

3）。 0xDA12然後在以下交易中將115K USDC換成199 ETH的199 ETH：https：//t.co/9yb5mg2z9i

4). 0xda12 then sent 199 ETH to 0xe41B in the following transaction: https://t.co/79M3mKqOaI

4）。 0xDA12然後在以下交易中發送199 eth至0xe41b：https：//t.co/79m3mkqoai

5). 0xe41B then deposited the 199 ETH to Bybit in the following transaction: https://t.co/R7L7QzR89B

5）。然後，0xe41b在以下交易中將199 ETH存入BYBIT：https：//t.co/r7l7qzr89b

6). Bybit credited the 199 ETH to Bybit user ID 2377101 in the following transaction: https://t.co/y8P7E9mP7E

6）。 BYBIT在以下交易中將199 ETH歸功於Bybit用戶ID 2377101：https：//t.co/y8p7e9mp7e

7). The user ID 2377101 then withdrew 199 ETH in transaction 14285848 to an address that begins with 0x99f in the following transaction: https://t.co/M75Nq6rJBi

7）。然後，用戶ID 2377101然後在交易中撤回199 ETH 14285848到以下交易中以0x99f開頭的地址：https：//t.co/m75nq6rjbi

8). The address 0x99f then sent the 199 ETH to 0xda12 in the following transaction: https://t.co/3qG7jO7I8v

8）。地址0x99f然後在以下交易中將199 ETH發送到0xDA12：https：//t.co/3QG7JO7I8V

9). 0xda12 is the same address that sent the 115K USDC to the DeFiChain address.

9）。 0xDA12是將115K USDC發送到Defichain地址的相同地址。

This is a potential chain of events that could have occurred, and it is possible that other events took place. However, this analysis provides a plausible account of how the USDC funds could have been moved and how they are linked to the Bybit hack.

這是可能發生的一系列可能發生的事件，並且可能發生其他事件。但是，該分析提供了一個合理的描述，說明了USDC資金如何被移動以及如何與Bybit Hack相關。

In the past six years since the launch of USDC, crypto users remained skeptical of the freeze function inherent to the USDC token. In theory, Circle could choose to freeze any address for any reason. This time, however, the token issuer has not taken note of the small-scale funds leak.

自USDC推出以來，在過去的六年中，加密用戶仍然對USDC令牌固有的凍結功能保持懷疑。從理論上講，Circle可以出於任何原因選擇凍結任何地址。但是，這一次，令牌發行人尚未註意到小規模的資金洩漏。

Circle is working at scale, often issuing $250M mints daily, and has paid little attention to smaller holdings. Circle has still assisted

Circle正在大規模工作，通常每天發行2.5億美元的造幣廠，幾乎不關注較小的持股。圈子仍然協助