币安在资产上市成本政策相关指控后重新成为人们关注的焦点

雅加达 - 币安是世界上最大的加密货币交易所之一，在受到与其资产上市成本政策相关的指控后，再次成为人们关注的焦点。

Binance has once again found itself under fire after allegations regarding its asset listing cost policy surfaced. The controversy began when Moonrock Capital CEO Simon Dedic claimed that Binance had requested up to 15% of the total supply of project tokens to be listed on their platforms.

在有关其资产上市成本政策的指控浮出水面后，币安再次受到批评。争议始于 Moonrock Capital 首席执行官 Simon Dedic 声称币安已要求将项目代币总供应量的 15% 在其平台上上市。

These allegations were further supported by an example of an unnamed project that reportedly raised nearly $1 billion and was required to pay between $50 million and $100 million to be listed on Binance.

这些指控得到了一个未命名项目的例子的进一步支持，据报道该项目筹集了近 10 亿美元，并需要支付 5000 万至 1 亿美元才能在币安上市。

According to Dedic, despite the projects undergoing a year-long due diligence process, they were still faced with substantial costs. This sparked discussion among the crypto community, with several figures expressing concern that such a requirement could harm the crypto project ecosystem.

Dedic 表示，尽管这些项目经历了长达一年的尽职调查过程，但它们仍然面临着巨额成本。这引发了加密社区的讨论，一些人士表示担心这样的要求可能会损害加密项目生态系统。

Binance co-founder Yi He responded to the strong criticism by highlighting that their exchange prioritized a stringent selection process rather than the financial value of projects.

币安联合创始人何一回应了强烈的批评，强调他们的交易所优先考虑严格的选择过程，而不是项目的财务价值。

“We have never cared only about the financial side or the number of tokens offered. If a project does not pass our selection process, it will not be listed, no matter how much funds or tokens are offered,” Yi stated.

“我们从来不只关心财务方面或提供的代币数量。如果一个项目没有通过我们的筛选过程，无论提供多少资金或代币，它都不会被列出，”易说。

He also invited the community to check Binance's own policies and conduct further research before believing in news that may be designed to instill fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD).

他还邀请社区在相信可能旨在灌输恐惧、不确定性和怀疑（FUD）的新闻之前检查币安自己的政策并进行进一步研究。

This policy, according to Yi, aims to protect investors and ensure that only high-quality projects are listed on Binance. Another Binance supporter chimed in, stating that this policy helps prevent the entry of “sad tokens” that could potentially harm retail investors.

易表示，这一政策旨在保护投资者并确保只有高质量的项目才能在币安上市。另一位币安支持者也表示，这项政策有助于防止可能损害散户投资者的“悲伤代币”进入。

However, Dedic remained unconvinced, accusing Binance of attempting to downplay it with manipulative language while not fully denying the large amount they asked for.

然而，Dedic 仍然不相信，指责币安试图用操纵性语言淡化这一点，同时又没有完全否认他们要求的巨额金额。

“The narrative or term used does not change the fact that the funds taken from the founders of this project are massive,” he said.

“所使用的叙述或术语并没有改变这个项目创始人获得的资金数额巨大的事实，”他说。

The controversy escalated further as Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong joined the discussion, claiming that Coinbase offered free-cost listing services through their platform, Coinbase Asset Hub.

随着 Coinbase 首席执行官布莱恩·阿姆斯特朗 (Brian Armstrong) 加入讨论，声称 Coinbase 通过其平台 Coinbase Asset Hub 提供免费上市服务，争议进一步升级。

This claim was swiftly countered by Andre Cronje, founder of Fantom Network, who asserted that Coinbase did, in fact, ask for very high payments, ranging from $30 million to $300 million. Cronje also revealed that the fees demanded recently reached $60 million.

这一说法很快遭到 Fantom Network 创始人安德烈·克罗涅 (Andre Cronje) 的反驳，他声称 Coinbase 事实上确实要求支付非常高的款项，从 3000 万美元到 3 亿美元不等。克罗涅还透露，最近要求的费用达到了 6000 万美元。

Adding to his own experience, Tron Foundation's Justin Sun stated that Coinbase had asked for a guarantee of 500 million TRX, or approximately $80 million, and Bitcoin worth $250 million as a condition for listing.

Tron 基金会的 Justin Sun 补充道，根据自己的经验，Coinbase 已要求提供 5 亿 TRX（约合 8000 万美元）的担保以及价值 2.5 亿美元的比特币作为上市条件。

Sun emphasized that Binance did not charge nearly as much for his project, highlighting the vast disparity in the policies of these two exchange giants.

孙强调，币安对他的项目收取的费用几乎不高，这突显了这两个交易所巨头政策上的巨大差异。