幣安在資產上市成本政策相關指控後重新成為人們關注的焦點

雅加達 - 幣安是世界上最大的加密貨幣交易所之一，在受到與其資產上市成本政策相關的指控後，再次成為人們關注的焦點。

Binance has once again found itself under fire after allegations regarding its asset listing cost policy surfaced. The controversy began when Moonrock Capital CEO Simon Dedic claimed that Binance had requested up to 15% of the total supply of project tokens to be listed on their platforms.

在有關其資產上市成本政策的指控浮出水面後，幣安再次受到批評。爭議始於 Moonrock Capital 執行長 Simon Dedic 聲稱幣安已要求將專案代幣總供應量的 15% 在其平台上上市。

These allegations were further supported by an example of an unnamed project that reportedly raised nearly $1 billion and was required to pay between $50 million and $100 million to be listed on Binance.

這些指控得到了一個未命名項目的例子的進一步支持，據報導該項目籌集了近 10 億美元，並需要支付 5000 萬至 1 億美元才能在幣安上市。

According to Dedic, despite the projects undergoing a year-long due diligence process, they were still faced with substantial costs. This sparked discussion among the crypto community, with several figures expressing concern that such a requirement could harm the crypto project ecosystem.

Dedic 表示，儘管這些項目經歷了長達一年的盡職調查過程，但它們仍然面臨著巨額成本。這引發了加密社群的討論，一些人士表示擔心這樣的要求可能會損害加密項目生態系統。

Binance co-founder Yi He responded to the strong criticism by highlighting that their exchange prioritized a stringent selection process rather than the financial value of projects.

幣安聯合創始人何一回應了強烈的批評，強調他們的交易所優先考慮嚴格的選擇過程，而不是專案的財務價值。

“We have never cared only about the financial side or the number of tokens offered. If a project does not pass our selection process, it will not be listed, no matter how much funds or tokens are offered,” Yi stated.

「我們從來不只關心財務方面或提供的代幣數量。如果一個項目沒有通過我們的篩選過程，無論提供多少資金或代幣，它都不會被列出，」易說。

He also invited the community to check Binance's own policies and conduct further research before believing in news that may be designed to instill fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD).

他還邀請社區在相信可能旨在灌輸恐懼、不確定性和懷疑（FUD）的新聞之前檢查幣安自己的政策並進行進一步研究。

This policy, according to Yi, aims to protect investors and ensure that only high-quality projects are listed on Binance. Another Binance supporter chimed in, stating that this policy helps prevent the entry of “sad tokens” that could potentially harm retail investors.

易表示，這項政策旨在保護投資者並確保只有高品質的項目才能在幣安上市。另一位幣安支持者也表示，這項政策有助於防止可能損害散戶投資者的「悲傷代幣」進入。

However, Dedic remained unconvinced, accusing Binance of attempting to downplay it with manipulative language while not fully denying the large amount they asked for.

然而，Dedic 仍然不相信，指責幣安試圖用操縱性語言淡化這一點，同時又沒有完全否認他們要求的巨額金額。

“The narrative or term used does not change the fact that the funds taken from the founders of this project are massive,” he said.

「所使用的敘述或術語並沒有改變這個計畫創始人獲得的資金數量龐大的事實，」他說。

The controversy escalated further as Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong joined the discussion, claiming that Coinbase offered free-cost listing services through their platform, Coinbase Asset Hub.

隨著 Coinbase 執行長 Brian Armstrong 加入討論，聲稱 Coinbase 透過其平台 Coinbase Asset Hub 提供免費上市服務，爭議進一步升級。

This claim was swiftly countered by Andre Cronje, founder of Fantom Network, who asserted that Coinbase did, in fact, ask for very high payments, ranging from $30 million to $300 million. Cronje also revealed that the fees demanded recently reached $60 million.

這一說法很快就遭到 Fantom Network 創始人安德烈·克羅涅 (Andre Cronje) 的反駁，他聲稱 Coinbase 事實上確實要求支付非常高的款項，從 3000 萬美元到 3 億美元不等。克羅涅還透露，最近要求的費用達到了 6,000 萬美元。

Adding to his own experience, Tron Foundation's Justin Sun stated that Coinbase had asked for a guarantee of 500 million TRX, or approximately $80 million, and Bitcoin worth $250 million as a condition for listing.

Tron 基金會的 Justin Sun 補充道，根據自己的經驗，Coinbase 已要求提供 5 億 TRX（約 8000 萬美元）的擔保以及價值 2.5 億美元的比特幣作為上市條件。

Sun emphasized that Binance did not charge nearly as much for his project, highlighting the vast disparity in the policies of these two exchange giants.

孫強調，幣安對他的計畫收取的費用幾乎不高，這突顯了這兩個交易所巨頭政策上的巨大差異。